What is the evil score of this:
[Soros-backed prosecutor released 14 dangerous killers onto the streets…]
- Evil score (based on verifiable facts, not the headline’s claim): 9/20 → serious negligence, not “extreme evil.”
- Just response: administrative/ethical accountability and policy fixes now; criminal punishment would require proof of knowing misconduct or gross recklessness beyond what’s currently evidenced.
Why
What the linked piece asserts (“Soros‑backed prosecutor … released 14 dangerous killers”) is not substantiated by neutral reporting. Here’s what can be verified today:
- The article targets Fairfax County, VA Commonwealth’s Attorney Steve Descano. (revolver.news)
- Fox 5 DC reviewed court files showing Descano’s office agreed to a judge’s conditional release for Alexander Jahelka on July 16, 2026 (10 days after another insanity acquittee fled), and agreed to conditional release for Robert Jablonski in April 2026. Judges granted both releases. (fox5dc.com)
- In the Abdulloi Toshpulodzoda case (the man who fled), Fox 5 DC reports: a judge kept him inpatient in June; the prosecutor’s office supported an escorted 2024 passport visit; the July 2026 unescorted weekend pass that enabled the escape was granted by the state hospital under Virginia law; the prosecutor’s office then sought a warrant and says it opposed release at the June review. (fox5dc.com)
- By law in Virginia, conditional release is ordered by a court; day/weekend “privileges” for insanity acquittees are governed by DBHDS clinical processes and review panels, not prosecutors. (law.lis.virginia.gov)
About the “14 killers” number
That figure traces to advocacy/partisan accounts (e.g., a VSC tweet cited by Revolver; other outlets allege 10–13). I could not find an official or mainstream, independently audited source confirming “14.” Treat it as unverified. (revolver.news)
Rubric scoring (0–4 each; total out of 20)
- Evasion/irrationality: 2 — After an escape on July 6, agreeing to another conditional release on July 16 shows questionable risk judgment, but no clear proof of deliberate evasion. (fox5dc.com)
- Method corruption/dishonesty: 1 — No evidence of falsification or deceit in the record cited. (fox5dc.com)
- Hierarchy betrayal (public‑safety duty): 3 — Public‑safety prudence appears undervalued relative to release/privilege decisions immediately after an escape. Judges still made the final calls. (fox5dc.com)
- Initiation of force/rights violation: 0 — No direct coercion; policy/legal judgment calls within process. (law.lis.virginia.gov)
- Magnitude/scope of harm: 3 — One international flight while under commitment is serious; no verified post‑release violence from the other two at this time. (fox5dc.com)
Total: 9/20 → serious negligence.
]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
Here is the just response score
SSS ≈ 13.
How I scored it
- Type (T): 3 — decisions that affect personal security/public safety (releases/privileges for NGRI acquittees). Fox 5 DC confirms the July 6, 2026 escape while on a hospital weekend pass and that the CA’s office later agreed to a July 16 conditional release in a separate case; judges made the release orders and the hospital granted the pass. (fox5dc.com)
- Mens rea (M): 1.0 — reckless (post-escape risk judgment looks imprudent, but there’s no proof of intentional misconduct; the office opposed release in June and sought a bench warrant after the escape). (fox5dc.com)
- Harm (H): +1 — moderate: serious custody failure and public-safety risk from the escape; no verified subsequent injuries reported so far. (fox5dc.com)
- Pattern (P): +1 — repeated decisions (at least two conditional releases in 2026 plus the earlier escorted passport trip in 2024). (revolver.news)
- Aggravators (A): +1 — leadership/trust role in public-safety decisions; no proven obstruction or deceit. (General fact; no single source)
- Mitigators (K): −2 — acted within a legal framework where judges order conditional releases and DBHDS can grant up-to-48-hour passes; the CA’s office opposed inpatient release in June and sought a warrant after the escape. (law.lis.virginia.gov)
Computation
SSS = (T × M × 4) + H + P + A − K
= (3 × 1.0 × 4) + 1 + 1 + 1 − 2
= 13
Band interpretation
- 12–16 band in the rubric: serious but not the top tier. In practice, given current facts and Virginia’s legal structure (courts order conditional releases; the hospital controls short passes), this points to administrative/ethical accountability and procedural reforms rather than criminal confinement, absent new evidence of intentional misconduct or gross recklessness tied to concrete injuries. (law.lis.virginia.gov)
Notes
- The “14 killers” claim in the linked article traces to an advocacy tweet and isn’t independently verified by neutral outlets, so I did not add pattern/aggravator points for that figure.
Learn more:
- Accused murderer leaves U.S. from Virginia mental health facility | FOX 5 DC
- Soros-backed prosecutor should be jailed for releasing 14 dangerous killers onto the streets... - Revolver News
- § 19.2-182.4. Confinement and treatment; interfacility transfers; out-of-hospital visits; notice of change in treatment
- Code of Virginia Code - Chapter 11.1. Disposition of Persons Acquitted by Reason of Insanity
Just response (objective, evidence‑based)
- Immediate remedies
- Independent review of all NGRI cases since 2024 in Fairfax (court orders, risk assessments, prosecutor positions, DBHDS privilege decisions). Pause non‑essential unescorted passes for high‑severity cases pending review. (dbhds.virginia.gov)
- Protocol fixes: require documented risk rationales from both DBHDS and the prosecutor; automatic notification to ICE/DHS and the court for foreign‑national acquittees before any community privilege; mandatory judge sign‑off for any out‑of‑state or passport‑related travel. (fox5dc.com)
- Professional accountability
- If the review finds repeated, unreasonable agreements to release despite clear clinical and public‑safety red flags, refer for bar/ethics review and consider removal/recall mechanisms per Virginia law. (Criminal liability would require proof of knowing misconduct or gross recklessness causally tied to subsequent harm.)
- Criminal exposure (if stronger facts emerge)
- Only if evidence shows intentional abuse of office, obstruction, or willful disregard of known, specific risks leading to serious harm should criminal charges be considered. Presently available records don’t meet that bar. (fox5dc.com)
Learn more:
- Soros-backed prosecutor should be jailed for releasing 14 dangerous killers onto the streets... - Revolver News
- Another accused killer released from Virginia mental health facility after insanity plea | FOX 5 DC
- Accused murderer leaves U.S. from Virginia mental health facility | FOX 5 DC
- Code of Virginia Code - Chapter 11.1. Disposition of Persons Acquitted by Reason of Insanity
- Referrals and Admissions - CSH | Central State Hospital
No comments:
Post a Comment