definition and characteristics of an "objective law"

 To define the concept of an "objective law" objectively:

1. Reduce to perceptual level roots and basic axioms/principles:

• Perceptual level roots: Objects, entities, attributes, actions, events, relationships we perceive in reality
• Basic axioms/principles: Existence exists, consciousness is consciousness of something, A is A (law of identity), things act in accordance with their nature (causality)

2. Identify intermediate steps/principles:

• Laws describe the way things act/interact based on their natures
• Laws are derived from observing patterns in how things behave
• Laws summarize these observed patterns in conceptual form
• Laws enable predictions about future behavior

3. Essential characteristics/conceptual common denominators:

• Describes an observable, recurring pattern of behavior/interaction
• Based on entities, attributes, actions as they exist in reality
• Results from an entity's immutable nature/identity
• Has logically integrated, non-contradictory content
• Applies universally to the entities/interactions it covers
• Enables reliable predictions when assumptions are met

4. Define by genus and differentia:
   An objective law is a statement (genus) that accurately describes an observable, recurring pattern of behavior or interaction in reality, which necessarily results from the immutable natures of the entities involved, applies universally, has logically integrated content, and enables reliable predictions (differentia).

Criteria for an objective definition:

• Roots in perceptual data/observations of reality
• Based on valid axioms/principles (e.g. identity, causality)
• Logically integrated from perceptual to abstract levels
• Non-contradictory content
• Corresponds to facts of reality
• Universal applicability within its defined context
• Enables predictions that can be tested

This definition meets those criteria based on current knowledge. It is grounded in perception, logic, and an objective metaphysics. The essential characteristics derive from how we induce laws empirically yet must integrate them rationally. However, it is always possible that a more complete, general definition could be formulated with further knowledge.