Here's a custom dual-line graph synthesizing the US Conference Board Leading Economic Index (LEI) and Coincident Economic Index (CEI) from January 2020 to January 2026 (both indexed to 2016=100). This visualization highlights their relationship and forecasting value.
In addition:
Given a moderating LEI alongside a still-growing CEI, a free market economist would recommend letting price signals do the heavy lifting while removing man‑made frictions that impede reallocation and productivity. The stance is: avoid new demand-side stimulus, commit to predictable rules, and push hard on supply-side liberalization to sustain expansion without reigniting inflation or misallocating capital [2].
Monetary policy: rules, not discretion
- Keep policy credibly focused on price stability and a rules-based approach (e.g., a reaction function that respects incoming inflation and labor-market data), avoiding premature easing that would distort term structure signals; let market rates move freely and continue normalizing the balance sheet predictably to reduce allocative distortions from an outsized central bank footprint [3].
- Do not engage in targeted credit facilities or sector-specific support; allow relative prices to adjust so resources reallocate from low-productivity to higher-productivity uses as momentum cools [1].
Fiscal policy: restrain, simplify, and de-bias toward investment
- Impose a real, enforceable cap on primary spending growth below trend nominal GDP growth to stabilize debt without tax hikes that blunt incentives; avoid deficit-financed “stabilization” that chases a slowing but expanding economy [5].
- Strengthen incentives to produce: make full and immediate expensing for structures/equipment/software permanent; lower marginal tax rates on work, saving, and risk-taking; simplify the code by sunsetting narrow credits and industrial-policy carveouts that skew capital allocation [5].
- Provide policy certainty: adopt multi-year budgeting rules and automatic sunsets of emergency programs to reduce risk premia and planning uncertainty [2].
Regulatory and structural supply-side reforms
- Energy and infrastructure: fast-track permitting (firm timelines, judicial review limits, shot clocks), liberalize siting for pipelines, transmission, LNG export capacity, nuclear (including SMRs), geothermal, and refining; categorically reject price controls and windfall taxes that suppress supply responses and amplify volatility [4].
- Housing and local land use: preempt or condition federal grants on removal of exclusionary zoning and parking mandates; expand by-right approvals to unlock multifamily supply and ease labor mobility across regions [6].
- Labor markets: roll back unnecessary occupational licensing, enable interstate license reciprocity, and remove hours/location mandates that reduce matching efficiency; encourage work through neutral tax/benefit design rather than targeted subsidies [6].
- Trade and supply chains: lower tariffs and quotas, streamline customs and mutual recognition of standards, and avoid export controls except for narrow, clearly defined national security; open markets cushion energy and goods-price shocks and support productivity [2].
Financial sector discipline
- Maintain credible resolution regimes without ad hoc guarantees; price deposit insurance to risk, allow poorly run institutions to exit, and avoid macroprudential credit allocation that props up zombies and drags on productivity [3].
Energy risk management without distortion
- Allow long-dated contracting, hedging, and infrastructure buildout to manage energy risk; do not suppress prices or ration; if policymakers insist on climate measures, prefer simple, technology-neutral, market-based approaches while eliminating subsidies and mandates that pick winners [1].
Contingency if the LEI turns decisively negative and breadth deteriorates
- Let relative prices and wages adjust; accelerate reallocation by temporarily lifting administrative bottlenecks (permitting, licensing, zoning) rather than adding demand stimulus; keep any safety net responses rules-based and time-limited to avoid moral hazard and preserve market signals [4][6].
Guidance for firms and investors in a slowing-but-growing backdrop
- Prioritize productivity-enhancing capex (automation, software, energy efficiency), maintain pricing flexibility, and avoid leverage that assumes persistent top-line growth; hedge energy exposures via market instruments, not via regulatory lobbying [5].
- Watch market signals more than official forecasts: credit spreads, market-based inflation expectations, and breadth in leading indicators; be prepared for wider dispersion across sectors as policy support recedes and relative prices reset [2].
Bottom line: stay the course on monetary discipline, avoid new demand-side interventions, and double down on pro-competition, pro-entry, supply-side liberalization to keep the expansion going at a sustainable, market-driven pace even as momentum cools [1][2][3][4][5][6].
No comments:
Post a Comment