Concrete, conservative reforms to keep the courts, DOJ, and FBI out of politics

 Concrete, conservative reforms to keep the courts, DOJ, and FBI playing it straight and out of politics:

• Codify strict firewalls between the White House and DOJ/FBI on specific cases—every contact logged, narrow exceptions for urgent national security, and quarterly public reporting [4][6].
• Tighten the Special Counsel framework with automatic triggers for cases involving candidates, fixed scope and deadlines, mandatory transparency to Congress at closure, and a codified pre‑election “quiet period” for public actions absent a compelling, certified need [3][9].
• Rein in FISA and secret courts: require corroborated evidence, independent amici to challenge government claims, penalties for omissions, robust red‑teaming, tight limits on “backdoor searches,” and full accounting of unmaskings and political sensitivities [6][8][5].
• Sunlight after the fact: publish redacted charging and declination memos once cases close, conduct annual independent audits of charging disparities, and stand up public dashboards for DOJ/FBI Inspector General findings [2][7].
• Enforce content‑neutrality: ban ideological labels in case files, require AG sign‑off for “sensitive investigative matters” involving campaigns, journalists, clergy, and grassroots groups, and bar censorship‑by‑proxy with social media absent written legal process that is logged and later disclosed [8][6][9].
• Restore fair venues and juries: default to trials where most alleged conduct occurred, ease change‑of‑venue when pretrial publicity is extreme, and keep judge assignments random to prevent forum shopping [1][3].
• Real accountability for misconduct: give Inspectors General testimonial subpoena power over former officials, impose mandatory discipline for Brady/Giglio violations, and bar taxpayer‑funded settlements for proven wrongful prosecutions [7][5].
• De‑politicize the pipeline: extend cooling‑off periods before senior DOJ/FBI officials can work on campaigns, require Senate confirmation for key policy‑making posts, and clarify removal‑for‑cause standards for the FBI Director’s single, nonrenewable term [4][2].
• Guardrails around elections: codify a 90‑day prohibition on overt investigative steps against candidates or campaigns unless a three‑judge panel and the AG certify an overriding public interest with written findings released after the election [9][1].
• Protect whistleblowers with safe reporting channels to the IG and Congress, strong anti‑retaliation, expedited case handling, and rewards for substantiated disclosures [7].
• Right‑size tactics: prioritize summonses over raids, require proportionality and senior approval for dynamic entries, use body‑worn cameras on federal warrants, and publish after‑action summaries when operations go wrong [6][5].
• Exercise rigorous congressional oversight: regular public hearings with IGs, time‑limited authorities that sunset without reform, and declassification reviews of historic abuses once risks recede [8][3].
• Clarify judicial ethics and recusals—transparent financial disclosures and recusal explanations—while protecting judges from partisan intimidation and preserving separation of powers [4].
• Protect civil liberties: make it unlawful to relabel protected political or religious speech as “extremism” to unlock surveillance tools, and require a documented criminal predicate for any intrusive step [8].
• Stop the leaks: strengthen leak investigations with judicial oversight, stiff penalties for politicized leaks, and incentives for internal reporting instead of media dumping [9].
• Train for neutrality: mandatory annual First Amendment, bias‑neutrality, and evidence‑disclosure training for all prosecutors and agents, with certification tied to performance reviews [2].
• Grand jury balance: standard instructions emphasizing neutrality, allow limited defense submissions of exculpatory evidence, and record all proceedings for post‑case review [1][5].

Bottom line: equal rules, real transparency, hard limits on power, and meaningful consequences for abuse—because blind justice is not a slogan, it’s the standard that keeps politics out of law and law above politics [4].

Sources

1 Liberty and Tyranny by Mark Levin

2 Hamilton's Curse by Thomas J. Dilorenzo

3 How the Left Was Won by Richard Mgrdechian

4 Broke by Glen Beck

5 Vindicating the Founders: Race, Sex, Class, and Justice in the Origins of America by Thomas G. West

6 The Federalist Papers In Modern Language edited by Mary E. Webster

In addition:

Here’s a deeper, practical, conservative playbook to keep the courts, DOJ, and FBI neutral, accountable, and out of partisan politics—focused on clear rules, transparency, and real consequences.

Core principles to guide reform

• Equal justice under law: standardized rules that apply regardless of who is in office or under investigation [4].
• Separation of powers and federalism: Congress sets guardrails, the Executive enforces the law, and courts adjudicate—with no branch commandeering another for political ends [4].
• Sunlight and due process: transparency after the fact, strict predicates before intrusions, and proportionality in tactics [2][5][6].

Statutory reforms Congress can pass

• Codify DOJ–White House contact limits

  • Require all contacts on specific cases to be logged, limited to lawful, necessary topics (e.g., national security or policy), audited by the Inspector General (IG), and reported quarterly in aggregate to Congress [4][2].
  • Establish penalties for violations and require remedial training for any official who breaches the protocol [2][4].

• Special Counsel guardrails for politically sensitive cases

  • Automatic appointment when investigating a major-party candidate or close family; fixed scope, budget, and deadlines absent written extensions; closing report to Congress with necessary redactions; and a pre‑election “quiet period” for overt steps absent a documented, high bar of necessity approved by the AG [3][4].
  • Mandate recusal standards and written justifications when declined to avoid the appearance of favoritism [3].

• FISA and surveillance reforms

  • Require corroboration and full‑and‑frank disclosure to the FISA Court, independent amici to challenge the government’s claims in sensitive cases, and penalties for material omissions or errors [6].
  • Tighten “backdoor searches”: require a warrant to query U.S. person identifiers absent exigency; log and later review unmaskings touching campaigns, media, faith groups, or political speech [6][4].

• Protect elections from investigative distortions

  • Enact a 90‑day prohibition on overt law‑enforcement actions involving candidates or campaigns unless the AG and a three‑judge panel certify a compelling need; publish redacted findings after the election [1][3].
  • Define “Sensitive Investigative Matters” (SIMs) in statute and require AG or DAG sign‑off with a documented criminal predicate for any SIM involving media, clergy, grassroots groups, or political figures [6][4].

• Venue, jury, and judge‑assignment fairness

  • Presume venue where most alleged conduct occurred; ease change‑of‑venue when pretrial publicity is extreme; and mandate random judge assignment to deter forum shopping [1][3].

• Real accountability for misconduct

  • Grant DOJ/FBI IGs testimonial subpoena power over former officials; mandate discipline for Brady/Giglio violations; and prohibit taxpayer‑funded settlements in proven wrongful prosecution cases without personal accountability proceedings [5][2].
  • Require public executive‑summary reports when systemic failures are found, with corrective‑action plans and timelines [2].

• Strengthen whistleblower protections

  • Create safe, confidential channels to IGs and Congress with strong anti‑retaliation rules, expedited adjudication, and interim relief when credible retaliation is alleged [2][5].

• Clarify FBI Director tenure and removal

  • Single, non‑renewable term; define “for cause” removal; and require prompt notification to Congress with a written rationale to prevent political whiplash while preserving accountability [4].

• Judicial ethics and recusal transparency

  • Require timely financial disclosures and brief written recusal explanations, while protecting judges from intimidation and preserving independence [4].

Transparency and due‑process measures

• Sunlight after cases close

  • Publish redacted charging and declination memos post‑closure; create public dashboards of DOJ/FBI IG recommendations, status, and compliance rates [2][4].
  • Annual independent audits of charging patterns to detect disparities; require corrective actions if outliers persist [2].

• Grand‑jury balance without compromising secrecy

  • Standard instructions on neutrality; allow limited defense submissions of clearly exculpatory evidence; record proceedings for sealed, post‑case review by courts if misconduct is alleged [3][5].

• Content neutrality and civil liberties

  • Prohibit labeling protected speech as “extremism” to justify surveillance; require documented criminal predicates for intrusive steps; and bar censorship‑by‑proxy with social media absent written legal process that is logged and later disclosed [6][4].

Tactics, training, and culture

• Right‑size law‑enforcement tactics

  • Prefer summonses over raids when safe; set a proportionality standard for dynamic entries with senior approval; use body‑worn cameras on federal warrants where feasible; and publish after‑action summaries when operations go wrong [5][6].

• Mandatory annual training and certification

  • First Amendment, bias‑neutrality, Brady/Giglio disclosure, and FISA accuracy training tied to performance reviews; require remedial training after IG or court findings [2][6].

Executive‑branch actions (no new law needed)

• Day‑one AG memos to implement contact logs, SIM approvals, election‑season quiet periods, declination‑memo transparency after closure, social‑media contact logging, and enhanced discovery obligations [4][2][6].
• DOJ/FBI internal compliance units to audit case predicates, FISA filings, and SIM approvals, reporting results to IGs quarterly [6][2].

Congressional oversight that bites

• Regular, public oversight hearings with IGs; time‑limited authorizations for sensitive authorities that sunset absent reform; and structured declassification reviews of past abuses once risks recede [4][3].
• Require semiannual metrics: FISA error rates, SIM approvals and reversals, election‑season exceptions, declination‑memo publications, whistleblower case outcomes, and training completion rates [2][6].

Implementation timeline and safeguards

• First 100 days: AG contact/quiet‑period memos, SIM approval policy, discovery‑compliance directive, training plan, and IG audit schedule [4][2].
• First year: pass core statutes (contact limits, SIMs, FISA fixes, special counsel guardrails), stand up transparency dashboards, launch annual audits [3][6].
• Ongoing: emergency exceptions allowed only with written justifications, narrow tailoring, and automatic after‑action review to prevent paralysis in crises while keeping politics at bay [6][4].

Bottom line: write neutral rules into law, enforce them with independent audits and sunlight, and back them with real penalties. That’s how we achieve a justice system that is blind to politics and faithful to the Constitution—every time, for everyone [4][2][6].

Sources

1 Liberty and Tyranny by Mark Levin

2 Hamilton's Curse by Thomas J. Dilorenzo

3 How the Left Was Won by Richard Mgrdechian

4 Broke by Glen Beck

5 Arguing With Idiots by Glen Beck

6 Vindicating the Founders: Race, Sex, Class, and Justice in the Origins of America by Thomas G. West