A roast of this [Christian congregations and their faith are white supremacist and homophobic]

 One word: Smear.

Two words: Collectivist smear.

Three words: Witch-hunt logic.

Full roast:
A person who calls an entire Christian congregation “white supremacist and homophobic” is an evidence-free collectivist smear that tramples individual judgment and freedom of conscience. It’s the same authoritarian reflex—left or right—that swaps proof for labels and tries to police thought instead of debating ideas.

• Hasty generalization: You indict millions by stereotype. Outliers or fringe anecdotes don’t justify branding a whole faith tradition.
• Guilt by association: If a bigot once claimed a Christian label, that says nothing about the average congregant’s beliefs or actions. Individuals are morally responsible for themselves, not for every self-proclaimed co-traveler.
• Non sequitur: Theological disagreement about sexual ethics does not logically equal racial supremacy or hatred. Disagreement is not dehumanization.
• Category error: You conflate doctrines about behavior and conscience with immutable characteristics like race. That’s a bogus move used to collapse debate into slogans.
• Begging the question: You assume “disagree = hate,” then use that assumption as your proof. That’s circular.
• Straw man: Christianity is caricatured as a political tribe rather than a diverse set of congregations with wide moral and pastoral differences.
• Motte-and-bailey: You gesture at some extremists, then retreat to the safer claim that “the faith culture” is the problem—smuggling the extreme onto the mainstream.
• Unfalsifiability: Denials are framed as “fragility,” admissions as “gotchas.” Heads you win, tails they lose. That’s not inquiry, it’s dogma.
• Projection: You condemn “intolerance” by practicing it—collective moral condemnation without due process or evidence.
• Authoritarian impulse: Labeling conscience as hate and demanding compelled affirmation is soft-totalitarian—closer to the tactics of fascists and communists than to liberal pluralism or freedom.
• Hypocrisy: Preaching “inclusion” while excluding a massive, diverse community based on your stereotype is performative moralism, not justice.

A free society judges acts, not identities; arguments, not labels. If you have evidence of specific wrongdoing, present it. If not, stop deputizing slurs as a substitute for reason. Trade the bullhorn for an argument and meet people as individuals, not as targets for ideological purification.