Failure of Communism: documented facts and studies + visual aid

 

Empirical Analysis of Communism's Historical Implementations

Communism, as a political and economic ideology based on the works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, advocates for a classless, stateless society with collective ownership of the means of production. In practice, it has often been implemented through centralized state control under socialist or communist regimes. The statement that "communism has failed every time it has been tried" is a common critique, and there is substantial empirical evidence to evaluate this claim by examining historical cases, economic performance, and social outcomes.

1. Historical Case Studies of Communist Regimes

Empirical data on communist systems primarily comes from the 20th-century experiments in countries such as the Soviet Union, China, Cuba, Vietnam, North Korea, and Eastern Bloc nations. Below are summaries of key cases with documented outcomes:

• Soviet Union (1922–1991)
  The Soviet Union was the first major experiment in communism under Lenin and later Stalin. Empirical data shows mixed outcomes:

  • Successes: Rapid industrialization in the 1930s transformed the USSR from an agrarian society into an industrial powerhouse, with significant growth in steel production (from 4.3 million tons in 1928 to 18.3 million in 1940, according to Soviet state records cited in Davies, 1996). Literacy rates improved dramatically (from 24% in 1897 to 87.4% by 1939, per UNESCO data). The USSR also played a major role in defeating Nazi Germany during World War II.
  • Failures: The centrally planned economy led to inefficiencies, shortages, and stagnation by the 1970s–1980s. The Great Purge (1936–1938) resulted in the deaths or imprisonment of millions (estimates range from 700,000 to 1.2 million executions, per Getty & Naumov, 1999). The Holodomor famine (1932–1933) in Ukraine, widely attributed to forced collectivization, caused an estimated 3.5–7 million deaths (Snyder, 2010). Economic collapse and political dissatisfaction led to the dissolution of the USSR in 1991.
  • Studies: Kornai (1992) in The Socialist System argues that the Soviet model suffered from inherent systemic flaws, such as lack of price signals and incentives, leading to chronic inefficiency. Conversely, Fitzpatrick (1999) notes that the Soviet system achieved certain social goals, like reducing inequality in access to education, though at a high human cost.

• People’s Republic of China (1949–present)
  Under Mao Zedong, China adopted communism with a focus on agrarian reform and industrialization. It later transitioned to a mixed economy under Deng Xiaoping.

  • Successes: Post-1978 reforms integrating market mechanisms lifted hundreds of millions out of poverty (World Bank data shows extreme poverty dropping from 88% in 1981 to under 1% by 2015). Literacy and life expectancy improved significantly (life expectancy rose from 43 years in 1950 to 76 years by 2020, per UN data).
  • Failures: The Great Leap Forward (1958–1962) aimed at rapid industrialization but resulted in catastrophic famine, with estimates of 15–45 million deaths due to policy failures and poor planning (Dikötter, 2010, Mao’s Great Famine). The Cultural Revolution (1966–1976) caused widespread social disruption and economic setbacks, with millions persecuted (MacFarquhar & Schoenhals, 2006).
  • Studies: Naughton (2007) in The Chinese Economy highlights that China’s post-Mao shift away from pure communism toward market socialism was critical to its economic success, suggesting that strict communist policies under Mao were unsustainable. Li and Yang (2005) argue that centralized planning led to misallocation of resources during the early decades.

• Cuba (1959–present)
  After Fidel Castro’s revolution, Cuba adopted a communist system with heavy state control.

  • Successes: Cuba achieved high literacy rates (99.8% by 2015, per UNESCO) and a robust healthcare system, with life expectancy (78.8 years in 2020, per World Bank) comparable to developed nations despite economic constraints. It also resisted U.S. economic pressure through the embargo.
  • Failures: Economic stagnation due to centralized planning and the U.S. embargo resulted in persistent shortages of goods. GDP per capita remains low (around $9,500 in 2020, per World Bank), and political repression has been widely documented (Human Rights Watch reports ongoing restrictions on free speech and assembly).
  • Studies: Pérez (2011) in Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know notes that while social achievements are notable, economic isolation and lack of diversification have hindered growth. Mesa-Lago (2000) argues that Cuba’s system survived due to Soviet subsidies, which collapsed in the 1990s, exposing systemic weaknesses.

• North Korea (1948–present)
  North Korea’s version of communism under the Kim dynasty is often described as authoritarian with a cult of personality.

  • Successes: Limited data suggests early post-war reconstruction was rapid with Soviet aid, and the regime has maintained political stability through strict control.
  • Failures: Widespread famine in the 1990s caused an estimated 240,000–3.5 million deaths (Haggard & Noland, 2007). GDP per capita is among the lowest globally (around $1,700 in 2019, per UN estimates), and human rights abuses are extensive (UN Commission of Inquiry, 2014, documented systematic violations).
  • Studies: Haggard and Noland (2007) in Famine in North Korea attribute economic collapse to rigid central planning and isolationist policies. Lankov (2013) argues that the regime’s survival is due to repression rather than economic viability.

• Eastern Bloc (1945–1989)
  Countries like East Germany, Poland, and Hungary under Soviet influence adopted communist systems.

  • Successes: Industrial output and basic welfare (housing, education) improved initially post-WWII (Maddison, 2006, The World Economy).
  • Failures: Economic stagnation, lack of consumer goods, and political repression led to widespread dissatisfaction. The Berlin Wall’s fall in 1989 and the subsequent collapse of these regimes signaled systemic failure. GDP growth lagged behind Western Europe (e.g., East Germany’s per capita GDP was about 50% of West Germany’s by 1989, per Maddison data).
  • Studies: Kornai (1992) documents how shortages and inefficiency were endemic to centrally planned economies. Fulbrook (2005) notes that political oppression eroded public support.

2. Economic Performance: Comparative Data

Empirical economic data often shows that communist systems underperformed compared to market-based economies over the long term:

• GDP Growth: According to Maddison Project data (2020), Soviet GDP growth was strong in the early decades (averaging 4.5% annually from 1928–1950) but declined to near stagnation (1–2% annually) by the 1970s–1980s. In contrast, Western economies like the U.S. averaged 3–4% growth over the same period.
• Standard of Living: World Bank and UN data indicate that communist states often failed to match Western standards of living. For instance, by 1989, Soviet per capita income was about $9,200 (in 2011 PPP dollars), compared to $28,000 in the U.S. (Maddison, 2006).
• Innovation: Centrally planned economies struggled with technological innovation due to lack of competition. Studies like Berliner (1976) in The Innovation Decision in Soviet Industry highlight how bureaucratic constraints stifled creativity compared to capitalist systems.
• Poverty and Inequality: While communist regimes often reduced income inequality initially (e.g., Soviet Gini coefficient around 0.26 in the 1960s, per Atkinson & Micklewright, 1992), absolute poverty persisted due to low overall wealth creation. Post-communist transitions often saw inequality rise as market reforms were introduced (e.g., Russia’s Gini coefficient rose to 0.48 by 2000, per World Bank).

3. Social and Human Costs

Empirical evidence consistently shows high human costs associated with communist implementations:

• Famines and Economic Crises: As noted, policies like collectivization in the USSR and the Great Leap Forward in China caused massive loss of life. These are often attributed to poor planning and ideological rigidity (Dikötter, 2010; Snyder, 2010).
• Political Repression: Data from organizations like Amnesty International and historical records (e.g., Solzhenitsyn’s The Gulag Archipelago, backed by archival evidence) show millions were imprisoned or executed under communist regimes for political dissent. The USSR’s Gulag system held up to 2.5 million prisoners at its peak in the early 1950s (Applebaum, 2003).
• Migration and Defection: High rates of emigration or attempted escape (e.g., over 3 million East Germans fled to West Germany before the Berlin Wall’s construction, per Fulbrook, 2005) indicate public dissatisfaction with communist systems.

4. Scholarly Interpretations of “Failure”

The claim that communism “has failed every time it has been tried” is debated in academic literature, with nuanced interpretations:

• Systemic Failure: Economists like Kornai (1992) and Hayek (1944, The Road to Serfdom) argue that central planning inherently fails due to the “knowledge problem”—the inability to aggregate information efficiently without market mechanisms. Empirical data on shortages and black markets in communist states supports this (e.g., Soviet citizens relied on informal economies for basic goods, per Ledeneva, 1998).
• Implementation Issues: Some scholars argue that communism’s failures stem from poor implementation rather than ideology. For instance, Cohen (2009) in Soviet Fates and Lost Alternatives suggests that alternative policies under leaders like Bukharin could have mitigated Stalinist excesses. However, no large-scale communist state has avoided authoritarianism, casting doubt on this view.
• Partial Successes: Social achievements (e.g., Cuba’s healthcare, Soviet education) are cited as evidence that communism achieved some goals. Yet, studies like Mesa-Lago (2000) note these came at the cost of economic freedom and sustainability.
• External Factors: Some argue that failures were exacerbated by external pressures, like the U.S. embargo on Cuba or Cold War military spending burdens on the USSR. While valid, internal systemic issues often played a larger role (Kornai, 1992).

5. Counterexamples and Ongoing Experiments

While large-scale communist states have often collapsed or reformed (e.g., China’s market socialism), smaller or localized experiments exist:

• Kibbutzim in Israel: These voluntary communist communities achieved some success in agriculture and social cohesion in the mid-20th century but largely shifted to privatization by the 1990s due to economic pressures (Gavron, 2000).
• Vietnam and Laos: Both adopted communism but have integrated market reforms since the 1980s–1990s, with Vietnam’s GDP growth averaging 6–7% annually post-reform (World Bank, 2020). This suggests adaptation rather than strict adherence to communism.

6. Conclusion Based on Empirical Data

The empirical record shows that communism, as implemented in major 20th-century states, frequently resulted in economic stagnation, political repression, and significant human costs after initial periods of progress in industrialization or social welfare. While specific achievements (e.g., literacy, healthcare) are documented, they were often unsustainable or achieved at great cost. No large-scale communist system has endured without significant deviation toward market mechanisms (e.g., China, Vietnam) or external support (e.g., Cuba via Soviet aid). Thus, the statement “communism has failed every time it has been tried” aligns with much of the historical and economic data, though the definition of “failure” and the reasons for it remain subjects of scholarly debate.

---

Key Studies and References

Below is a list of key studies and data sources cited in this summary for further reading:

1. Kornai, J. (1992). The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism. Princeton University Press.
   • Analyzes systemic flaws in centrally planned economies with empirical data on shortages and inefficiency.
2. Dikötter, F. (2010). Mao’s Great Famine: The History of China’s Most Devastating Catastrophe. Bloomsbury.
   • Provides detailed evidence on the human cost of the Great Leap Forward.
3. Snyder, T. (2010). Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin. Basic Books.
   • Documents famines and repression in the Soviet Union, including the Holodomor.
4. Haggard, S., & Noland, M. (2007). Famine in North Korea: Markets, Aid, and Reform. Columbia University Press.
   • Examines economic collapse and famine in North Korea with quantitative estimates.
5. Naughton, B. (2007). The Chinese Economy: Transitions and Growth. MIT Press.
   • Discusses China’s shift from communism to market socialism with economic data.
6. Maddison, A. (2006). The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective. OECD Publishing.
   • Provides historical GDP and growth data for comparative analysis.
7. Applebaum, A. (2003). Gulag: A History. Doubleday.
   • Offers archival evidence on Soviet labor camps and repression.
8. Mesa-Lago, C. (2000). Market, Socialist, and Mixed Economies: Comparative Policy and Performance. Johns Hopkins University Press.
   • Compares economic outcomes in Cuba and other systems.

Additional data sources include World Bank, UNESCO, and UN reports for statistics on poverty, literacy, and life expectancy.

Visual Aid

Here is a visual aid to complement the empirical data on the historical implementation of communism. Below, I'll provide a React component using the recharts library to create a line chart comparing GDP per capita growth over time for selected communist and non-communist countries. This chart will visually represent the economic performance of communist systems like the Soviet Union, China, and Cuba against market-based economies like the United States, illustrating some of the trends discussed in the summary.

The data used in the chart is sourced from the Maddison Project (2020) and World Bank estimates, as cited in the previous response. Since exact year-by-year data over long periods can be cumbersome, I've summarized key data points at significant intervals to show broader trends. The chart will focus on the period from 1950 to 2020 (or the latest available data) to cover major communist experiments and their economic outcomes.

jsx

              strokeWidth={3}
              dot={{ r: 5 }}
              activeDot={{ r: 7 }}
            />
            <Line
              type="monotone"
              dataKey="cuba"
              stroke="#f59e0b"
              name="Cuba"
              strokeWidth={3}
              dot={{ r: 5 }}
              activeDot={{ r: 7 }}
            />
          </LineChart>
        </ResponsiveContainer>
      </div>
      <p className="text-xs text-gray-500 mt-2 text-center">
        Note: Soviet Union data ends in 1991 due to dissolution; post-1991 data is not included as it transitions to market economies.
      </p>
    </div>
  );
};

export default GDPTimelineChart;

react 1

---

Explanation of the Visual Aid

• Purpose: This line chart visualizes the economic performance of communist systems (Soviet Union, China, Cuba) compared to a market-based economy (United States) over the period from 1950 to 2020. GDP per capita in 2011 Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) dollars is used as a standardized measure of economic output per person, reflecting standards of living.
• Data Source: The data is derived from the Maddison Project (2020) historical dataset and supplemented by World Bank estimates for recent years, as cited in the earlier summary. I've used key decade markers to simplify the trend lines while capturing significant shifts.
• Key Observations:
  • The United States shows consistent growth in GDP per capita, reflecting the sustained economic expansion of a market-based system.
  • The Soviet Union saw moderate growth until the 1980s but stagnated and ceased to exist after 1991, aligning with empirical evidence of economic collapse discussed earlier.
  • China’s GDP per capita was extremely low during the Maoist era (1950s–1970s) but shows a dramatic increase after market reforms in the 1980s, supporting the argument that deviation from strict communism was necessary for economic success.
  • Cuba’s growth is modest and plateaus, reflecting economic challenges under a communist system compounded by external factors like the U.S. embargo.
• Features: The chart is responsive (adapts to screen size), includes a tooltip for detailed value inspection, and uses distinct colors for clarity. A legend and axis labels provide context, and a note clarifies the Soviet Union data limitation.

This visual aid helps illustrate the empirical trend that communist economies often lagged behind market economies in long-term wealth creation, a key point in the critique that "communism has failed every time it has been tried" from an economic perspective.

GDP Per Capita Over Time (1950-2020)

Data represents GDP per capita in 2011 PPP dollars for selected countries. Source: Maddison Project (2020) and World Bank.

• United States
• Soviet Union
• China
• Cuba