Traditional price theory doesn’t predict automatic “runaway” inflation from tariffs. It predicts that the inflation impact depends on pass‑through, substitution, and monetary/expectations dynamics. Several mechanisms can explain why the September 2025 PCE showed no runaway tariff-driven costs:
- Limited pass-through. In competitive markets, foreign suppliers and domestic importers often eat part of the tariff via thinner margins, productivity gains, and cost-cutting, so final consumer prices rise less than the headline tariff rate implies [1][3].
- Substitution and re-sourcing. Buyers switch toward untariffed inputs, alternative countries, or domestic producers, which blunts price pressure on the aggregate consumption basket [4][6].
- Exchange-rate offsets. A stronger domestic currency can partially neutralize tariffs by making foreign goods cheaper in local currency terms, reducing effective pass-through into consumer prices [2].
- Level effect vs. ongoing inflation. Tariffs act like a relative price shock that may lift some prices once, but they don’t create persistent inflation unless validated by accommodative monetary policy or wage-price feedback loops. PCE tracks the rate of change; absent policy accommodation, inflation pressure fades after the initial adjustment [3][5].
- Small weight of tariffed items. Services dominate PCE, and many tariffed goods are a modest share of the index. Even notable increases in a narrow set of goods won’t drive the aggregate measure into “runaway” territory [7].
- Contracts, inventories, and lags. Long-term contracts, hedging, and inventory drawdowns smooth the timing and size of price adjustments, further reducing immediate inflation spikes in PCE [6].
- Anchored expectations and credibility. If households and firms believe inflation will stay near target, they resist large, second-round price and wage hikes, preventing escalation from a one-off tariff shock [5].
- Market-led reallocation. Entrepreneurs reconfigure supply chains, expand domestic capacity where economical, and innovate to lower costs, all of which erode the initial price impact over time in a laissez-faire setting [1][4].
- Measurement matters. PCE is chain-weighted and captures substitution toward cheaper alternatives, so it naturally records lower inflation from a given relative-price shock than a fixed-weight index would [7][2].
Bottom line: In a free-market framework, competitive pressures, substitution, and credible monetary policy turn tariffs into a mostly transitory, narrowly concentrated price-level shock rather than a self-reinforcing, broad inflation spiral—hence no “runaway” tariff-driven costs in the latest PCE data [3][7].
Sources
In addition:
Here’s some additional, market-oriented context for why tariffs haven’t produced “runaway” costs in the latest PCE:
-
Incidence and pass-through discipline. In competitive markets with elastic demand and supply, part of a tariff is absorbed by foreign producers and domestic importers via lower markups, productivity improvements, and cost rationalization, so consumer price pass-through is partial rather than one-for-one [1][3].
-
Aggregation dampens the effect. PCE is dominated by services and includes a relatively modest share of tradable goods; even noticeable increases in a subset of tariffed goods have limited leverage over the headline aggregate, especially when non-tariffed categories offset with stable or falling prices [2][6].
-
Level shock vs. persistent inflation. Traditional theory treats tariffs as a relative price shock: they can raise some prices once, but they don’t produce continuing, generalized inflation unless validated by accommodative monetary policy or unanchored expectations, which is why PCE’s rate of change doesn’t spiral absent those conditions [3][5].
-
Exchange-rate offsets. A stronger domestic currency reduces the local-currency cost of imports and can partially neutralize tariff effects on final consumer prices, lowering measured pass-through in PCE [2].
-
Substitution and re-sourcing. Firms and consumers substitute toward untariffed inputs, alternative source countries, or domestic suppliers when it’s economical, blunting aggregate price pressure and reinforcing competitive discipline—classic laissez-faire adjustment margins at work [4][6].
-
Contracts, inventories, and menu costs. Long-term contracts, inventory drawdowns, and state-dependent pricing slow and smooth price adjustments, which mutes short-run spikes and spreads any impact over time in PCE [6].
-
Producer-to-consumer wedge. Tariffs tend to show up first in import prices and some producer prices; retail margins often compress as firms compete for customers, so consumer prices (PCE) rise less than upstream measures might suggest [1].
-
Policy granularity and exemptions. Real-world tariff regimes include exclusions, duty drawbacks, and classification changes; these carve-outs reduce the broad reach of tariffs and further limit translation into consumer inflation [4].
-
What would create “runaway” dynamics? Broad-based, sizable tariffs applied to high-weight consumption categories, combined with accommodative monetary policy and de-anchored expectations, could propagate second-round effects; absent that mix, the shock remains contained in scope and duration [5][3].
-
What to monitor going forward. Watch import price indices (ex-energy), core goods PCE, services inflation, measures of inflation expectations, the dollar’s trade-weighted value, and corporate margins; together they indicate whether tariff shocks are being absorbed or transmitted to consumers [2][6].
-
Market-consistent policy takeaway. From a laissez-faire perspective, the most durable way to minimize consumer harm is to reduce trade barriers and let competitive markets reallocate resources and innovate; when barriers persist, market competition, substitution, and credible monetary policy still limit the inflationary fallout [1][4].
In short, competitive pass-through, substitution, exchange-rate adjustments, and anchored expectations transform tariffs into a mostly one-time, narrow relative price change rather than a self-reinforcing inflation spiral in PCE [3][2].
No comments:
Post a Comment