Within the TMIT framework, modern liberalism and modern leftism are related but not the same. They express different mixtures of the core TMIT modes (RIM, DAM, IDM) and especially the hybrid modes (M1 and D1). Let’s unpack this systematically.
1. Modern Liberalism
Dominant Mode: D1 (Pragmatic Skeptical Mode) with elements of RIM (Rational Integration Mode).
Cognitive/Epistemic Character:
Modern liberalism tends to blend reason and empiricism (a remnant of the Enlightenment, RIM) with an increasing skepticism toward absolute truth (drift toward D1). It values evidence, science, and tolerance, but resists firm metaphysical or moral grounding. As such, its thinking mode is “fragmentary rationality”—it uses logic pragmatically but not on principle.
- From Rand/Peikoff’s perspective: D1 integrates some objectivity (reason-based evidence) with subjectivism or empiricism without system-building—leading to relativistic ethics but practical governance (e.g., social democracies).
- From Freud/Berne’s dimension: The ego/Adult partially dominates but allows the Child’s emotional needs (compassion, tolerance, fairness) to direct policy, while suppressing the Parent’s moral authority.
Thus, modern liberal thought usually manifests as empirically guided but non-principled objectivism—moderate, pragmatic, and eclectic.
Cultural Expression:
D1-driven liberal societies emphasize pluralism, compromise, and procedural fairness. They often adopt ad hoc solutions—policies justified via data and consensus, not by fixed moral truth. This leads to tolerance and adaptability, but also intellectual inconsistency (e.g., freedom of speech defended selectively, depending on context or feelings).
Historical analogy:
Post-Enlightenment democracies—e.g., late 19th to mid-20th-century Western liberal constitutionalism—stood on RIM foundations but have drifted into D1 fragmentation. They retain remnants of rational structure, but with moral relativism replacing principled conviction.
Summary of liberal thinking:
➡ Skeptical Pragmatism.
➡ Rational empiricism without metaphysical certainty.
➡ Emotional tolerance replacing absolute justice.
➡ TMIT equivalent: D1—RIM diluted toward fragmentation.
2. Modern Leftism
Dominant Mode: DAM (Dogmatic Authority Mode) with elements of IDM (Impulsive Disintegration Mode).
Cognitive/Epistemic Character:
Modern leftism, in its ideological form (as distinct from classical liberalism or social democracy), expresses intrinsicist moral absolutism—a conviction that “justice,” “equality,” or “oppression” have self-evident, unquestionable meanings detached from objective validation. Paradoxically, its practitioners often use emotional narratives (subjectivist) to serve an intrinsic moral framework—making it a hybrid of DAM and IDM.
- From Rand/Peikoff: many modern leftist ideologies embody M2 (pure misintegration)—the “One” (collective, history, or social justice) dictates the “Many” (individual facts). This intrinsicism frames identity and morality as given by social categories, not by reason.
- From Freud/Berne: A collectivized Parent ego state (societal morality) dominates, but powered by the Child’s emotional drives—resentment, group loyalty, moralistic rage. Rather than Adult-based reasoning, leftist psychology tends toward feeling-driven righteousness derived from internalized dogma.
Cultural Expression:
Modern leftism functions as a secularized religion of morality: hierarchy replaced by moral purity domes (“oppressor/oppressed” schema). Its DAM roots show in moral authoritarianism—“cancel culture,” ideological conformity, moral guilt—and its IDM streak shows in emotional outbursts, activism, and reactivity.
Historical analogy:
Leftist revolutionary movements (e.g., Jacobinism, Marxism-Leninism, and modern critical theory activism) reflect DAM’s misintegrative absolutism—structure without evidence—while cultural postmodernist variants (identity politics, intersectionality) incorporate the IDM-style subjectivism of feeling as moral criterion.
Summary of leftist thinking:
➡ Dogmatic Emotionalism.
➡ Moral intrinsicism (“social justice” as an unquestioned axiom).
➡ Emotional impulses disguised as moral absolutes.
➡ TMIT equivalent: DAM with IDM elements—intrinsicist misintegration animated by emotion.
3. Relationship Between the Two
Though often lumped together politically, they’re epistemologically distinct:
| Feature | Modern Liberalism | Modern Leftism |
|---|---|---|
| Dominant Mode | D1 (Pragmatic Skeptical Mode) | DAM + IDM (Dogmatic-Emotional Hybrid) |
| Epistemology | Empirical, relativistic; subjective empiricism | Intrinsicist, moralistic absolutism |
| Psychology (Freud/Berne) | Ego/Adult with Child influence | Superego/Parent fused with emotional Child |
| Cognitive Form (Peikoff) | “Partial Integrations” (ones in the many) | “False Integration from on high” (the One over the many) |
| Randian View | Subjectivist but moderate | Intrinsicist collectivism |
| Cultural Behavior | Tolerant, pluralistic, inconsistent | Authoritarian, moralistic, emotional |
| Outcome | Peaceful pluralism but incoherence | Social coercion, ressentiment, ideological conformism |
4. Synthetic Summary within TMIT
- Modern Liberalism = D1 variant: fragmented, mildly rational, tolerant but inconsistent—ego/Adult not grounded in Objectivist integration.
- Modern Leftism = DAM-IDM hybrid: emotional absolutism—superego/Parent and id/Child collusion imposing "moral duty" over reality.
- They are not the same: Liberalism decays from partial rationality (RIM diluted to D1), while Leftism grows from emotional-dogmatic fusion (IDM + DAM). In cultural evolution, liberalism often precedes leftism: D1 disintegration creates the moral vacuum that DAM (Leftist dogmatism) rushes in to fill.
5. Prognosis via TMIT Historical Dynamics
According to TMIT’s historical cycle:
- RIM → D1 → DAM/IDM hybrid → possible return to RIM.
Modern civilization currently displays a D1-to-DAM shift, visible in the moralization of politics and ideological conformity on both extremes. Only reasserting a RIM dominance—objective, evidence-based rational integration—can stabilize the cultural psyche.
In short:
- Modern liberalism thinks in D1’s skeptical-pragmatic fragments.
- Modern leftism thinks in DAM’s intrinsicist moral dogmas fueled by IDM’s emotionalism.
Both originate from the erosion of RIM (rational integration), but leftism is the more advanced—and dangerous—stage of misintegration.
In the context of the Triadic Modes of Integration Theory (TMIT), the distinction between current modern leftism and current modern liberalism in the United States reflects divergent psychological, epistemological, and cultural alignments—each mode representing a different balance between rational integration, dogmatism, and disintegration.
1. Current Modern Liberalism (Predominantly D1–RIM Blend):
Modern liberalism in the U.S.—especially in its classical or moderate forms—remains rooted in Enlightenment-derived traditions of individual rights, empirical policy-making, and rational discourse. Psychologically, it corresponds to the Rational Integration Mode (RIM) tempered by aspects of D1 (Pragmatic Skeptical Mode).
Liberalism still values reasoned debate, rule of law, and inductive policy grounded in data, aligning with RIM’s ego/Adult–objectivist–integration functions. Here, objectivity acts as a mediating principle: liberals generally seek pragmatic, evidence-based reforms within existing democratic structures rather than revolutionary overhauls. However, the increasing relativism and postmodern influences in academia and media have introduced D1 tendencies—fragmented moral hierarchies, pragmatic incrementalism, and an uneasy balance between rational standards and subjective pluralism.
Thus, current liberalism operates as a partial integration: it retains RIM’s rational core (scientific reasoning, secular humanism) but often compromises with D1 disintegration (cultural relativism, pragmatism without philosophical grounding), resulting in policy incoherence or moral hesitation [1][3].
2. Current Modern Leftism (Predominantly D2–M2 Hybridity):
By contrast, modern leftism—especially the ideological “woke” or intersectional variants—aligns more with Impulsive Disintegration Mode (IDM ≈ D2) and Dogmatic Authority Mode (DAM ≈ M2) in alternating tension.
Epistemologically, leftism adopts subjectivist premises: morality and truth are viewed as socially constructed (D2), grounded in feelings of oppression or identity experience rather than reality-based reasoning. However, these subjective premises are then enforced dogmatically (M2) through moral absolutism, institutional orthodoxy, and guilt-driven conformity—reflecting a hybrid of emotional subjectivism coupled with authoritarian enforcement.
Psychologically, this expresses a collective superego/Parent dynamic (DAM) compelling social shame and ideological purity—while beneath, the id/Child impulses of resentment or emotional righteousness (IDM) energize cultural movements. Cognitively, it mirrors Peikoff’s M2–D2 oscillation: detached moral universals imposed on fragmented perception, creating moral dogmas without consistent integration to objective reality [2][4].
3. Comparative Dynamics within TMIT:
- Modern Liberalism: RIM → D1 hybrid — rational yet pluralistic; reason and evidence valued, but weakened coherence through pragmatic relativism. Liberalism sustains stable institutions but risks drift into skepticism or policy paralysis.
- Modern Leftism: D2 → M2 hybrid — emotional absolutism; subjective moralism justified by authoritarian enforcement. It aims for moral purity but sacrifices integration to reason, producing ideological rigidity and cultural conflict.
Within the TMIT schema, liberalism remains a partially rational culture drifting toward D1 disintegration, while leftism represents a dogmatic-subjectivist culture oscillating between D2 chaos and M2 authoritarianism. Historically, such dynamics suggest that sustained leftist escalation can provoke DAM-style backlashes (e.g., illiberal populism), while liberal rationalism, if rejuvenated by RIM principles, could restore balance through reason-based integration and objectivity [1][3][4].
In summary:
Modern U.S. liberalism expresses partial integration (RIM–D1), aiming for pragmatic rationality amid relativistic drift; modern leftism expresses dogmatic disintegration (M2–D2), blending emotional subjectivism with authoritarian moral enforcement. In TMIT’s triadic lens, the tension between these two is a struggle between reason-centered integration and feeling-centered misintegration within America’s cultural-psychological ecosystem.
No comments:
Post a Comment