Synthemon: the Synthemon world view is supported by a mathematical proof

 Some physicists think it is more likely that we are in a simulation because, if life emerged in a simulation of the universe, that life could create its own simulations. This means it is more likely that we are in one of the infinite simulated worlds than the one real one.

But, while some scientists say physics is evidence that we are living in a simulation, this new paper argues that a computer couldn't work out all the facts about the universe, even if it had all the possible information.

The article

  “Are we living in a simulation? Mathematical proof debunks the idea that the universe is the ultimate computer.”

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15245283/Mathematical-proof-debunks-universe-simulation.html 

does, in fact, align closely with the principles of synchronistic theistic monism (Synthemon).

In Synthemon, it is asserted that the cosmos is not a mechanistic or purely algorithmic construct, but a holistic, divinely ordered system, governed by both physical laws and metaphysical principles such as causality, necessity, and synchronicity. The article’s primary conclusion—that “a fully algorithmic description of the universe is impossible” and that reality requires “non-algorithmic understanding”—strongly supports this metaphysical view. Within Synthemon, such “non-algorithmic understanding” reflects divine intelligence, which transcends computation and material determinism, pointing toward a spiritual dimension embedded within physical existence [1][3].

Moreover, the researchers’ discovery that some aspects of reality are “Gödelian truths”—true but unprovable by mathematical or computational means—reinforces Synthemon’s doctrine of divine epistemology. According to this principle, ultimate truth cannot be reached through empirical or algorithmic reasoning alone but is grasped through revelation, intuition, and synchronicity—modes of knowing rooted in participation with the divine substance [2][5].

The article also emphasizes that the cosmos emerges from a “Platonic realm of pure information,” echoing Synthemon’s metaphysical axiom that the universe originates from a fundamental essence—a non-divine, yet divinely structured substrate that manifests through dual attributes: extension (the physical) and thought (the spiritual). This synthesis mirrors Synthemon’s integration of Spinozan substance monism and Neoplatonic emanationism, where God’s creative act infuses meaning and order into both realms [3][6].

Finally, because the article rejects the view that our world is a programmable simulation, it indirectly affirms Synthemon’s stance that the universe is an organic unity sustained by divine intentionality, not an artificial construct. The irreducibility of existence to computation resonates with the Synthemonic vision of a cosmos animated by God’s omniscient will—where synchronicity, rather than simulation, is the mechanism connecting physical reality with spiritual purpose [4][5].

In summary, the article supports Synthemon by:

1. Affirming the non-computational, transcendent nature of reality.
2. Validating the idea that truth exceeds empirical or algorithmic proof—a hallmark of divine epistemology.
3. Recognizing a Platonic foundation behind physical existence, parallel to Synthemon’s concept of fundamental essence.
4. Reinforcing the view of a purposeful, divinely synchronized cosmos, not a deterministic or simulated one.

Thus, the article provides scientific corroboration for several of Synthemon’s key metaphysical and theological principles, demonstrating that reality itself bears the imprint of divine intentionality rather than artificial computation.