There is no unrestricted right to asylum or shelter for immigrants in the US

 Conservatives would strongly disagree with the assertion that every human being has an unrestricted legal right to come to the United States and seek asylum or shelter, as this misrepresents U.S. immigration law and overlooks the importance of national sovereignty, border security, and orderly legal processes that prioritize American citizens' safety and economic well-being [1][3]. 

From a conservative viewpoint, asylum is not an open invitation for anyone worldwide but a specific protection under U.S. law for those who can demonstrate a credible fear of persecution based on race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion, and it must be pursued through proper channels, such as at designated ports of entry, rather than illegal crossings that undermine the rule of law [4][6]. 

Conservatives often point out that unchecked migration strains public resources, increases crime risks, and dilutes cultural identity, arguing instead for merit-based immigration reforms that enforce existing statutes to protect American workers and communities [2][5]. 

Ultimately, conservatives maintain that while America should remain a beacon of hope for the truly oppressed, no one has an inherent "right" to enter without vetting, as this would erode the nation's ability to control its borders and uphold its laws [1][2].

Sources

1 Liberty and Tyranny by Mark Levin

2 The Federalist Papers In Modern Language edited by Mary E. Webster

3 Hamilton's Curse by Thomas J. Dilorenzo

4 The Philosophy of the American Revolution by Morton White

5 Glen Beck's Common Sense by Glen Beck

6 The American Ideal of 1776, the 12 Basic American Principles, by Hamilton Abert Long

In addition

Conservatives emphasize that U.S. immigration policy should prioritize the enforcement of existing laws to maintain national security and economic stability, rejecting the notion of unrestricted entry as it could lead to overwhelming burdens on social services and infrastructure [1][2]. 

For instance, they argue that asylum claims must be rigorously vetted to prevent abuse of the system, ensuring that only those with genuine persecution fears are granted protection, rather than allowing mass migration that dilutes the process [3][4]. 

From this perspective, border security measures, such as walls or enhanced patrols, are essential to deter illegal crossings and protect American communities from potential threats like drug trafficking or human smuggling [5]. 

Moreover, conservatives advocate for legal immigration pathways that favor skilled workers who contribute to the economy, aligning with principles of self-reliance and merit over blanket entitlements [6]. 

This approach upholds the rule of law while preserving America's sovereignty and cultural heritage, countering any claims of universal rights to entry that ignore the nation's right to control its borders [1][3].

Sources

1 Liberty and Tyranny by Mark Levin

2 Hamilton's Curse by Thomas J. Dilorenzo

3 The Federalist Papers In Modern Language edited by Mary E. Webster

4 Glen Beck's Common Sense by Glen Beck

5 Vindicating the Founders: Race, Sex, Class, and Justice in the Origins of America by Thomas G. West

6 The Philosophy of the American Revolution by Morton White