Synthemon: can the past repeat itself?

 Let’s analyze the exchange between Nick Carraway and Jay Gatsby in The Great Gatsby (published in 1925, so “this spring” aligns with the current date of May 11, 2025, marking its centennial) through the lens of Synchronic Theistic Monism (Synthemon). In this scene, Nick Carraway asserts, “You can’t repeat the past,” while Jay Gatsby retorts, “Can’t repeat the past? Why of course you can!” Synthemon, with its monistic fundamental substance named God's Cosmic Essence, integrates substance monism, attribute dualism, synchronicity, divine epistemology, God’s plan, a holistic cosmos, free will, and a Judeo-Christian theistic framework, emphasizing cosmic rhythms, divine guidance, and spiritual growth. We’ll evaluate their positions using Synthemon’s principles, particularly focusing on historical cycles, free will, and God’s plan, to determine who aligns more closely with Synthemon’s worldview.


Contextualizing the Debate in The Great Gatsby
In The Great Gatsby, Nick Carraway and Jay Gatsby’s exchange reflects their differing views on time, memory, and the possibility of reclaiming the past. Nick, the pragmatic narrator, believes the past is unchangeable, a linear progression that cannot be revisited. Gatsby, the romantic idealist, clings to the hope of recreating his past romance with Daisy, believing he can restore what once was through determination and wealth. This debate touches on themes of time, agency, and the nature of history, which Synthemon addresses through its metaphysical and historical principles.

Synthemon’s Interpretation
Synthemon views reality as unfolding within God's Cosmic Essence, the unified substance created by God, where all events are interconnected and guided by divine will (Metaphysical Principle 2: Substance Monism; Metaphysical Principle 6: Holistic Cosmos). Let’s analyze Nick and Gatsby’s positions through Synthemon’s key principles to determine who is “right” in this context.

1. Historical Cycles and Cosmic Rhythms (Historical Principle 7: Historical Cycles Reflect Cosmic Rhythms and Divine Order)
  • Synthemon’s View: Synthemon recognizes that history operates in cycles—growth, decline, renewal—reflecting cosmic rhythms within God's Cosmic Essence (Principle 14: Align with Cosmic Rhythms in Personal and Historical Cycles). These cycles suggest that while the past cannot be identically repeated, patterns and themes can recur, allowing for renewal or re-creation in a new form (Historical Principle 5: History Progresses Through Synchronic Connections Toward Unity).
  • Nick’s Position (“You can’t repeat the past”): Nick’s assertion aligns with a linear view of time, where past events are fixed and cannot be re-lived. From a Synthemon perspective, this is partially correct: the exact circumstances of the past (e.g., Gatsby’s initial romance with Daisy in 1917) are unique and cannot be replicated due to the progression of time and the unfolding of God’s plan (Historical Principle 1: History Unfolds According to God’s Plan and Divine Will). The past, as a specific moment, is embedded in God's Cosmic Essence as a completed event, inaccessible in its original form.
  • Gatsby’s Position (“Of course you can!”): Gatsby’s belief that the past can be repeated reflects a desire to recreate a specific moment, ignoring the changes that have occurred. Synthemon would critique this as misaligned with cosmic rhythms, as it denies the natural progression of cycles. However, Gatsby’s hope for renewal resonates with Synthemon’s view that cycles allow for recurring patterns—e.g., love, connection, or opportunity can re-emerge in new forms, though not identically (Historical Principle 7).
  • Analysis: Synthemon leans toward Nick’s view that the past cannot be identically repeated, as time progresses according to God’s plan within God's Cosmic Essence. However, it acknowledges Gatsby’s perspective that elements of the past can re-emerge through cycles, such as the possibility of rekindling love, though in a transformed context. For example, Gatsby might not recreate 1917, but he could foster a new relationship with Daisy if aligned with divine timing.
2. Free Will and Alignment with God’s Plan (Principle 8: Exercise Free Will in Alignment with God’s Plan)
  • Synthemon’s View: Synthemon affirms free will but emphasizes that it should align with God’s plan (Ethical Principle 4: Exercise Free Will in Alignment with God’s Plan). Attempting to repeat the past might reflect a misuse of free will if it resists God’s unfolding design, but it could be valid if it aligns with divine will (Commandment 2: Seek God’s Plan and Align with Divine Will).
  • Nick’s Position: Nick’s statement implies a deterministic view, suggesting that the past is unchangeable and human agency cannot alter its finality. Synthemon partially agrees, as God’s plan governs history, and resisting this plan (e.g., trying to force the past to return) can lead to misalignment (Deuteronomy 30:19, “Choose life”). Nick’s realism reflects an acceptance of divine order, even if he doesn’t frame it theistically.
  • Gatsby’s Position: Gatsby’s insistence on repeating the past reflects his belief in the power of human will to overcome time. Synthemon would critique this as a potential misuse of free will, especially if Gatsby’s pursuit is driven by personal desire rather than divine guidance. In The Great Gatsby, Gatsby’s obsession with Daisy is rooted in nostalgia and materialism, not spiritual alignment, which Synthemon would see as contrary to God’s plan for growth and renewal (Principle 12: Pursue the Journey to Wholeness Through Spiritual Growth). However, if Gatsby sought to renew his relationship with Daisy through prayer and discernment, Synthemon might support his agency as an act of faith.
  • Analysis: Synthemon favors Nick’s position, as Gatsby’s approach risks resisting God’s plan by clinging to a static past rather than embracing the present cycle of renewal. However, Synthemon recognizes that free will allows for the pursuit of past ideals (e.g., love) in new forms, provided it aligns with divine will, giving Gatsby’s perspective some validity if reframed spiritually.
3. Synchronicity and Divine Guidance (Metaphysical Principle 5: Synchronicity)
  • Synthemon’s View: Synchronicity within God's Cosmic Essence reveals divine guidance through meaningful coincidences (Principle 2: Use Synchronicity to Discern Divine Guidance). The past may influence the present through synchronic events, suggesting that elements of the past can resurface in meaningful ways, but not as a literal repetition (Axiom 21: Axiom of Synchronicity: Meaningful Connections Reveal God’s Will).
  • Nick’s Position: Nick’s view that the past cannot be repeated aligns with Synthemon’s understanding that synchronic events do not recreate the past but rather connect past and present in new ways. For example, Gatsby’s reunion with Daisy in 1922 is a synchronic moment orchestrated by God’s Cosmic Essence, but it’s a new event, not a repetition of 1917 (Historical Principle 2: Synchronicity Shapes Historical Events Through Meaningful Connections).
  • Gatsby’s Position: Gatsby’s belief in repeating the past might be interpreted through Synthemon as a misreading of synchronicity. His reunion with Daisy could be seen as a divine opportunity to renew their connection, but his insistence on erasing the intervening years (e.g., Daisy’s marriage to Tom) ignores the synchronic meaning of the present moment. Synthemon would encourage Gatsby to discern God’s guidance through this event, rather than fixating on an unattainable past (Principle 2: Use Synchronicity to Discern Divine Guidance).
  • Analysis: Synthemon supports Nick’s perspective, as the past cannot be literally repeated, but synchronicity allows past themes to re-emerge in new forms. Gatsby’s reunion with Daisy is a new opportunity within God's Cosmic Essence, not a repetition, aligning more with Nick’s realism than Gatsby’s idealism.
4. Journey to Wholeness and Spiritual Growth (Principle 12: Pursue the Journey to Wholeness Through Spiritual Growth)
  • Synthemon’s View: Synthemon sees life as a journey to wholeness, where clinging to the past can hinder growth, while embracing the present aligns with God’s plan (Ethical Principle 9: Pursue the Journey to Wholeness). The past informs the present but should not dominate it (Historical Principle 10: Collective Growth Toward Wholeness Shapes Historical Evolution).
  • Nick’s Position: Nick’s assertion reflects a forward-looking perspective, accepting that the past is gone and the present must be lived as it is. Synthemon would commend this as aligning with the journey to wholeness, encouraging acceptance of God’s unfolding plan and growth through present circumstances (Principle 12: Pursue the Journey to Wholeness Through Spiritual Growth).
  • Gatsby’s Position: Gatsby’s fixation on repeating the past—specifically his idealized romance with Daisy—hinders his spiritual growth, as it prevents him from embracing the present reality (e.g., Daisy’s current life). Synthemon would see this as a failure to integrate past lessons into present growth, stunting his journey to wholeness (Principle 9: Pursue the Journey to Wholeness).
  • Analysis: Synthemon strongly favors Nick’s position here, as Gatsby’s obsession with the past contradicts the spiritual growth Synthemon emphasizes. Clinging to an unchangeable past prevents alignment with God’s plan, while accepting the present fosters wholeness.
5. Attribute Dualism and Integration (Metaphysical Principle 3: Attribute Dualism)
  • Synthemon’s View: God's Cosmic Essence manifests physical (matter/energy) and spiritual (consciousness/meaning) attributes, which should be integrated in daily life (Principle 9: Integrate Physical and Spiritual Attributes in Daily Life). The past has both physical (events) and spiritual (meanings) dimensions, which influence the present differently.
  • Nick’s Position: Nick’s view acknowledges the physical finality of the past (e.g., events like Gatsby’s initial romance are over), focusing on the present reality. Synthemon would agree that the physical past cannot be repeated, but its spiritual meaning can inform the present (Romans 1:20, “God’s invisible qualities… have been clearly seen”).
  • Gatsby’s Position: Gatsby focuses on the spiritual meaning of the past (his love for Daisy) but ignores its physical reality (time has passed, Daisy has changed). Synthemon would critique this imbalance, as it fails to integrate the dual attributes of the past within God's Cosmic Essence (Principle 9: Integrate Physical and Spiritual Attributes in Daily Life).
  • Analysis: Synthemon aligns more with Nick, as his position better integrates the physical reality and spiritual meaning of the past, avoiding the imbalance in Gatsby’s approach.

Who Is Right According to Synthemon?
  • Nick Carraway’s Position (“You can’t repeat the past”): Nick is more aligned with Synthemon’s worldview. Synthemon agrees that the past, as a specific set of events, cannot be identically repeated due to the progression of time within God's Cosmic Essence and the unfolding of God’s plan (Historical Principle 1: History Unfolds According to God’s Plan and Divine Will). Nick’s acceptance of this reality reflects an alignment with cosmic rhythms, a proper use of free will to live in the present, and a focus on spiritual growth toward wholeness (Principle 14: Align with Cosmic Rhythms in Personal and Historical Cycles; Principle 12: Pursue the Journey to Wholeness Through Spiritual Growth). While synchronicity allows past themes to re-emerge, they do so in new forms, not as literal repetitions, supporting Nick’s realism.
  • Jay Gatsby’s Position (“Of course you can!”): Gatsby’s position is less aligned with Synthemon, as his desire to repeat the past ignores the natural progression of God’s plan and cosmic cycles. His fixation on an idealized past hinders his spiritual growth, misuses free will by resisting divine timing, and fails to integrate the physical and spiritual dimensions of reality (Principle 8: Exercise Free Will in Alignment with God’s Plan; Principle 9: Integrate Physical and Spiritual Attributes in Daily Life). However, Synthemon acknowledges a partial truth in Gatsby’s hope: through synchronicity and divine guidance, elements of the past (e.g., love, connection) can re-emerge in new forms, but not as a literal repetition (Principle 2: Use Synchronicity to Discern Divine Guidance).
Synthemon’s Verdict

Nick Carraway is more “right” according to Synthemon, as his view aligns with the principles of accepting God’s plan, living in harmony with cosmic rhythms, and pursuing wholeness by embracing the present. Gatsby’s idealism, while reflecting a hope for renewal, is misguided in its refusal to accept the progression of time and God’s unfolding design within God's Cosmic Essence. However, Synthemon would encourage Gatsby to seek divine guidance through prayer or synchronicity (e.g., consulting the I Ching) to discern how past ideals can be renewed in the present, rather than repeated (Commandment 2: Seek God’s Plan and Align with Divine Will).


Synthemon on Repeating the Past: Nick Carraway vs. Jay Gatsby

In The Great Gatsby, Nick Carraway asserts, “You can’t repeat the past,” while Jay Gatsby insists, “Of course you can!” Synthemon, within God's Cosmic Essence, evaluates:
  • Historical Cycles: The past cannot be identically repeated due to cosmic rhythms, but patterns can recur in new forms (Historical Principle 7: Historical Cycles Reflect Cosmic Rhythms and Divine Order).
  • Free Will: Gatsby’s fixation misuses free will by resisting God’s plan, while Nick’s acceptance aligns with divine timing (Principle 8: Exercise Free Will in Alignment with God’s Plan).
  • Synchronicity: Past themes can re-emerge through divine guidance, but not as literal repetitions (Principle 2: Use Synchronicity to Discern Divine Guidance).
  • Wholeness: Nick’s realism fosters growth, while Gatsby’s obsession hinders it (Principle 12: Pursue the Journey to Wholeness Through Spiritual Growth).
    Synthemon deems Nick more aligned, as the past is fixed within God's Cosmic Essence, but encourages using synchronicity to renew past ideals in the present, aligning with God’s plan.

Final Thoughts
According to Synthemon, Nick Carraway is more correct in asserting that the past cannot be repeated, as this aligns with the progression of God’s plan, cosmic rhythms, and the journey to wholeness within God's Cosmic Essence. Gatsby’s hope, while partially valid through the lens of synchronicity, is misguided in its refusal to accept divine timing and present reality.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Vincent Van Gogh: personality/temperament profile

Princess Diana: personality/temperament profile

SYNCHRONISTIC THEISTIC MONISM: an Ebook that explains Tarot, I Ching, and more