The federal government can arrest a governor of a state or a mayor

 To determine whether the federal government can arrest and jail a governor, a state official, or a mayor of a city, we must examine the relevant sections of the Constitution of the United States and historical precedents, including court cases.

Relevant Sections of the Constitution:

1. Article I, Section 6 (Privileges and Immunities Clause):

   • This section provides certain immunities to members of Congress, but it does not extend to state officials or local leaders like governors or mayors.

2. Article II, Section 3 (Take Care Clause):

   • The President is responsible for ensuring that federal laws are faithfully executed. This authority can extend to federal law enforcement actions against state or local officials if they violate federal laws.

3. Article VI, Clause 2 (Supremacy Clause):

   • Federal laws and the Constitution are the supreme law of the land, which means state and local officials, including governors and mayors, are subject to federal laws and can face legal consequences for violating them.

4. 10th Amendment:

   • The 10th Amendment reserves powers not delegated to the federal government to the states or the people but does not shield state or local officials from accountability under federal law.

5. 14th Amendment, Section 1 (Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses):

   • This amendment ensures that no state or state official can deprive individuals of rights guaranteed under federal law, reinforcing federal authority over state officials when constitutional rights are at stake.

---

Historical Precedents and Court Cases:

1. Cooper v. Aaron (1958):

   • The Supreme Court held that state officials, including governors, are bound by federal law and Supreme Court decisions. This case arose during the Little Rock desegregation crisis, where the federal government intervened to enforce civil rights laws.

2. United States v. Lee (1882):

   • This case affirmed that no individual, including government officials, is above the law. While it did not involve a governor or mayor specifically, it established the principle that government officials are subject to both federal and state laws.

3. Ex parte Young (1908):

   • The Supreme Court ruled that state officials can be sued in their official capacity for violating federal law. While this case involved injunctive relief rather than criminal charges, it demonstrates federal authority over state officials.

4. Blagojevich Case (2008-2011):

   • Former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich was arrested and convicted on federal corruption charges, illustrating that governors can be prosecuted and jailed for violating federal laws.

5. Spiro Agnew Case (1973):

   • Although not a governor at the time, former Governor and Vice President Spiro Agnew was investigated and pleaded no contest to federal corruption charges. This further demonstrates that state and federal officials are not immune from federal prosecution.

6. Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick Case (2008-2013):

   • Former Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick was prosecuted and convicted on federal racketeering and corruption charges. This case is a clear example of the federal government's ability to hold local officials accountable.

---

Summary:

Under the Constitution, the federal government has the authority to arrest and jail governors, state officials, and mayors if they violate federal laws. The Supremacy Clause (Article VI) ensures that federal law takes precedence over state law, and court cases like Cooper v. Aaron and the prosecution of individuals like Rod Blagojevich and Kwame Kilpatrick confirm this authority. However, such actions typically require adherence to due process under the 14th Amendment and are often initiated in cases involving corruption, civil rights violations, or other breaches of federal law.

Sources 

1 The United States Supreme Court Edited by Christopher Tomlins 

2 On the Constitution of the United States by Joseph Story 

3 U.S. Constitution for Everyone by Mort Green 

4 The Constitution of the United States of America as Amended. Unratified Amendments. Analytical Index by Henry Hyde 

5 The Making of America by W. Cleon Skousen 

In addition:

The federal government’s authority to arrest and jail governors, state officials, or mayors arises from constitutional provisions and legal precedents that establish federal supremacy and the accountability of public officials under federal law. Let’s delve deeper into this subject.

---

Constitutional Basis for Federal Authority:

1. Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2):

   • The Constitution and federal laws are the "supreme law of the land," meaning state officials, including governors and mayors, are not exempt from compliance. This clause ensures that federal authority can override conflicting state actions if they violate federal law [1].

2. Take Care Clause (Article II, Section 3):

   • The President is tasked with ensuring that federal laws are faithfully executed. This power enables federal law enforcement to act against any individual, including state and local officials, who violate federal laws [3].

3. Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses (14th Amendment, Section 1):

   • State officials are prohibited from denying individuals equal protection or due process under federal law. If a governor or mayor engages in actions that violate constitutional rights, they can be held accountable under this amendment [4].

4. 10th Amendment:

   • While the 10th Amendment reserves powers to the states, it does not shield state or local officials from federal prosecution for violations of federal law. This ensures a balance between state autonomy and federal authority [5].

---

Historical Precedents:

1. Rod Blagojevich Case:

   • Former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich was arrested by federal authorities on charges of corruption, including attempting to sell the U.S. Senate seat vacated by Barack Obama. This case demonstrates that governors can face federal prosecution, as the Supremacy Clause ensures they are not above federal law [3][5].

2. Kwame Kilpatrick Case:

   • Former Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick was convicted on federal charges including racketeering and bribery. The federal government’s ability to prosecute local officials like Kilpatrick underscores its authority to address violations of federal law at any level of government [4].

3. Cooper v. Aaron (1958):

   • This Supreme Court case reaffirmed that state officials cannot defy federal law or Supreme Court rulings. The case arose after Arkansas Governor Orval Faubus resisted federal orders to desegregate schools, leading to federal intervention. It established that governors are bound by federal law and court decisions [1][3].

4. Spiro Agnew Case:

   • Before becoming Vice President, Spiro Agnew served as Governor of Maryland. He was investigated and pleaded no contest to federal corruption charges while in office. This case illustrates that even high-ranking state officials can be held accountable under federal law [5].

5. Ex parte Young (1908):

   • This case clarified that state officials could be subject to legal action under federal law when they act in violation of constitutional rights. Although it focused on civil remedies rather than criminal prosecution, it reinforced the principle of federal oversight [4].

---

Legal Principles and Limitations:

While the federal government has the authority to arrest and prosecute state and local officials, such actions are bound by constitutional safeguards:

• Due Process (5th and 14th Amendments):

  • Arrests and prosecutions must follow due process, ensuring fairness and adherence to legal procedures.

• Federalism and State Sovereignty:

  • Although the federal government holds supremacy in legal conflicts, it cannot interfere arbitrarily with state governance. Actions against state or local officials typically arise from clear violations of federal statutes [2].

---

Conclusion:

The Constitution provides a robust framework for the federal government to hold state and local officials accountable for violations of federal law. Historical cases, such as those involving Rod Blagojevich and Kwame Kilpatrick, confirm the federal government’s authority to arrest and jail governors, state officials, and mayors. The Supremacy Clause, reinforced by cases like Cooper v. Aaron, ensures that no state or local official is above the law. However, these actions must adhere to constitutional protections, reflecting the balance between federal authority and state sovereignty [1][3][5].

 Sources 

1 The United States Supreme Court Edited by Christopher Tomlin 

2 On the Constitution of the United States by Joseph Story 

3 U.S. Constitution for Everyone by Mort Green 

4 The Constitution of the United States of America as Amended. Unratified Amendments. Analytical Index by Henry Hyde 

5 The Making of America by W. Cleon Skousen