This Marxism phrase "to each according to his needs and..." is irrational

 The phrase "to each according to his needs and from each according to his ability" is a fundamental principle of socialist and communist ideologies. It suggests that resources and goods should be distributed based on individual needs while requiring contributions based on individual abilities.

 This concept, however, is considered wrong and irrational for several reasons, particularly from a psychological and philosophical standpoint.

Firstly, this principle undermines the concept of individual responsibility and personal agency, which are essential for healthy psychological development. When individuals are not held accountable for their contributions or are provided for regardless of their efforts, it can foster a sense of entitlement and dependency. This dependency can lead to diminished self-esteem and a lack of motivation, as people may feel that their efforts do not directly correlate with their rewards [1].

From a psychological perspective, such ideologies may reflect certain personality disorders or mental flaws, such as narcissism or a victim mentality. Individuals who advocate for these principles may exhibit traits of grandiosity, believing they can dictate the needs and abilities of others without considering the complexities of human motivation and effort. This can be seen as a form of delusion, where an individual is not grounded in reality and fails to recognize the consequences of their beliefs [5].

Moreover, the principle can lead to a negative "sense of life," where individuals adopt an anti-effort mentality. By promoting the idea that needs should be met without corresponding effort, it discourages hard work and achievement, leading to a disintegration of personal and societal values. This can create a society characterized by mediocrity rather than excellence, as people may opt for minimal effort in the absence of direct benefits [4].

Additionally, those who embrace this ideology may also exhibit traits of groupthink, where they conform to a collective mindset that dismisses individual reasoning. This can lead to a lack of critical thinking and an evasion of reality, as individuals choose not to engage with the complexities of human behavior and economics. Such an irrational psycho-epistemology can create a disintegrated mode of thought, where the connection between cause and effect is obscured [6].

In conclusion, the phrase "to each according to his needs and from each according to his ability" reflects a flawed understanding of human nature and societal dynamics. It promotes dependency, undermines personal responsibility, and fosters a disintegrated approach to thinking about individual rights and contributions. These elements contribute to the broader failures observed in socialist, Marxist, and leftist ideologies, which often lead to societal chaos rather than the promised equality and welfare.

Sources

1 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Text Revision Dsm-5-tr 5th Edition by American Psychiatric Association

2 Criminological and Forensic Psychology Third Edition by Helen Gavin

3 Liberalism is a Mental Disorder: Savage Solutions by Michael Savage, 2005 edition

4 Man in the Trap by Elsworth F. Baker

5 The Psychology of Freedom by Peter R. Breggin, M.D.

6 Abnormal Psychology: An Integrative Approach 8th Edition by David H. Barlow, Vincent Mark Durand, and Stefan G. Hofmann

In addition

The principle "to each according to his needs and from each according to his ability" has profound psychological implications and societal consequences that can be detrimental to individual and collective well-being.

One significant psychological implication is the promotion of a victim mentality. When individuals are conditioned to believe that their needs should be met without regard for their contributions, it can foster a lack of ownership over one’s life and circumstances. This dependency mindset can lead to low self-esteem, as individuals may feel powerless and unable to change their situations through personal effort. They may also develop feelings of resentment towards those who are seen as more capable or successful, further eroding social cohesion [1].

Moreover, this principle can encourage a form of moral relativism, where individuals rationalize their failure to contribute adequately by blaming external circumstances. This mentality can create a culture of entitlement, where people expect to receive benefits without a corresponding investment of effort or resources. The psychological consequence is a disconnection from reality, leading to unrealistic expectations about what society can provide [3].

In terms of societal consequences, the implementation of such a principle often results in a lack of innovation and productivity. When individuals do not see a direct correlation between their efforts and the rewards they receive, there is little incentive to strive for excellence or to pursue entrepreneurial endeavors. This stagnation can lead to economic decline and a general erosion of the work ethic that is vital for a prosperous society [4].

Additionally, the principle can lead to conflicts and divisions within society. As resources are redistributed based on perceived needs, it often creates animosity between different social groups. Those who contribute more may feel exploited, while those who receive benefits without corresponding contributions may feel justified in their entitlement. This can foster societal discord and undermine the fabric of community cooperation [5].

Furthermore, the psychological framework of collectivism that supports this principle may inhibit critical thinking and personal agency. Individuals may be conditioned to prioritize the group's needs over their own, which can result in the suppression of individual talents and aspirations. This collectivist mentality can lead to groupthink, where dissenting opinions are discouraged, and the result is a society that lacks diversity of thought and innovation [6].

In conclusion, the principle "to each according to his needs and from each according to his ability" not only reflects a misunderstanding of human nature but also has far-reaching psychological and societal implications. It undermines personal responsibility, fosters dependency and entitlement, stifles productivity and innovation, and creates divisions within society. These consequences illustrate the irrationality of such ideologies and their failure to provide a stable and thriving society.

Sources

1 Criminological and Forensic Psychology Third Edition by Helen Gavin

2 Liberalism is a Mental Disorder: Savage Solutions by Michael Savage, 2005 editio

3 The Psychology of Freedom by Peter R. Breggin, M.D.

4 Man in the Trap by Elsworth F. Baker

5 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Text Revision Dsm-5-tr 5th Edition by American Psychiatric Association

6 Abnormal Psychology: An Integrative Approach 8th Edition by David H. Barlow, Vincent Mark Durand, and Stefan G. Hofmann