Surgery and drugs for gender change in children is a failed experiment
Here are some key points and evidence often cited by critics who argue that surgical and drug therapy gender-affirming care for children is a failed social experiment:
Desistance Rates: Critics point to studies suggesting that a significant number of children who experience gender dysphoria may eventually identify with their sex assigned at birth without medical intervention. They argue that early medical treatments might be unnecessary and could lead to regret later in life [1].
Ethical and Consent Issues: There are concerns about whether children and adolescents can fully understand and consent to the long-term implications of medical treatments like hormone therapy and surgeries. Critics argue that these decisions should be made with more caution and consideration.
Long-Term Impact: The long-term physical and psychological effects of gender-affirming treatments in children are not yet fully understood. Critics worry about potential health risks associated with hormone therapy and surgeries performed at a young age [1].
Psychological and Social Pressures: Some believe that societal and peer pressures might influence children's decisions regarding gender identity, and that these children might benefit more from counseling and support rather than immediate medical interventions.
Legislative Actions: Several states and countries have enacted laws restricting or banning gender-affirming care for minors, reflecting concerns about the appropriateness and safety of these treatments for children.
Systematic Reviews: Recent systematic reviews conducted by public health authorities in countries like Finland, Sweden, and England have concluded that the risk/benefit ratio of youth gender transition ranges from unknown to unfavorable. These reviews suggest that the evidence does not support the notion that gender-affirming care is net beneficial for adolescents [1].
Sources
1 Current Concerns About Gender-Affirming Therapy in Adolescents
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11930-023-00358-x
Comments
Post a Comment