identity disintegration disorder

              "Identity Disintegration Disorder"

This name captures the essence of the condition, highlighting the profound disconnect individuals experience between their self-perception and objective reality. It emphasizes the chaotic nature of identity that leads to significant dysfunction in personal and social domains.

"Identity Disintegration Disorder" reflects the extreme and often irrational nature of identity claims that diverge from biological and social norms. This term underscores the emotional distress that individuals may experience as they grapple with their fragmented self-concept, leading to maladaptive behaviors and reliance on external validation [1][5].

Additionally, "Existential Identity Crisis Disorder" might be fitting, as it conveys the ongoing struggle individuals face in defining their identity within the context of a coherent and stable self-concept. This name suggests a deeper psychological conflict rooted in existential concerns, where individuals seek meaning and acceptance through increasingly radical identity assertions [2][4].

Ultimately, these  names highlight the characteristics of the disorder, framing it in a way that emphasizes the psychological challenges associated with a disintegrated or distorted sense of identity and the consequences of such a condition on an individual's functioning and well-being.

Sources

1 the Liberal Mind by Lyle H. Rossiter Jr., M.D.

2 Abnormal Psychology: An Integrative Approach 8th Edition by David H. Barlow, Vincent Mark Durand, and Stefan G. Hofmann

3 Criminological and Forensic Psychology Third Edition by Helen Gavin

4 The Psychology of Freedom by Peter R. Breggin, M.D.

5 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Text Revision Dsm-5-tr 5th Edition by American Psychiatric Association

6 Liberalism is a Mental Disorder: Savage Solutions by Michael Savage, 2005 edition

In addtion:

If we were to conceptualize a pathologic condition called "Identity Disintegration Disorder"  the diagnostic criteria could potentially include the following:

Persistent Identity Confusion: A marked and enduring confusion regarding one's identity, leading to frequent and extreme shifts in self-perception that are inconsistent with established biological and social realities. This may manifest as an inability to define oneself without resorting to external validation or radical identity claims [1].

Dissociation from Reality: A chronic evasion of objective reality, characterized by delusions or beliefs that significantly diverge from societal norms and biological facts. This may include identifying with non-human characteristics or extreme gender identities that do not align with one's biological sex [2].

Social Dependency: A compulsive need for social validation and acceptance, leading to behaviors that prioritize groupthink over individual reasoning. Individuals may constantly shift identities to align with perceived social trends or pressures, indicating a lack of self-reliance and personal agency [3].

Impaired Functioning: Significant impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning due to the identity distortions. This can include difficulty maintaining relationships, employment, or engaging in meaningful activities due to an unstable self-concept [4].

Emotional Dysregulation: A pattern of emotional instability and intense reactions to perceived threats to identity or self-esteem, often leading to impulsive behaviors or conflicts with others. Individuals may exhibit extreme frustration or anger when confronted with differing opinions about their identity claims [5].

Avoidance of Personal Responsibility: A tendency to blame external factors or societal structures for personal shortcomings or failures, leading to a victim mentality. This may manifest as a refusal to acknowledge the consequences of one’s actions or choices [6].

Resistance to Insight: A marked lack of awareness or refusal to acknowledge the irrationality of one's identity claims and behaviors. Individuals may display defensiveness or hostility when confronted with evidence contradicting their self-perception [1].

These criteria outline a condition where identity becomes pathological, leading to a disintegration of personal responsibility, reality perception, and social functioning. Addressing such a disorder would require a multi-faceted approach, including psychotherapy focused on building self-awareness, reinforcing personal responsibility, and fostering a realistic sense of identity grounded in objective truths.

Sources

1 the Liberal Mind by Lyle H. Rossiter Jr., M.D.

2 The Psychology of Freedom by Peter R. Breggin, M.D.

3 Abnormal Psychology: An Integrative Approach 8th Edition by David H. Barlow, Vincent Mark Durand, and Stefan G. Hofmann

4 The Personality Disorders Treatment Planner: Includes DSM-5 Updates (PracticePlanners) 2nd Edition by Neil R. Bockian, Julia C. Smith, and Arthur E. Jongsma Jr.

5 Liberalism is a Mental Disorder: Savage Solutions by Michael Savage, 2005 edition

6 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Text Revision Dsm-5-tr 5th Edition by American Psychiatric Association

In addition:

Some examples of   "Identity Disintegration Disorder" are:

a man being named Woman of the Year

a white woman who identifies as black

a father of seven who identifies as a 6-year-old girl

a man who identifies as a dog named 'Boomer'

a young lady who believes she is a cat trapped in a woman's body

a man who has his ears removed because he identifies as a parrot

a man who changed his identity to female but who has now had "her ears and nose REMOVED to transform into a 'dragon lady' with scales, a forked tongue and a horned skull.

Finally:

"Identity Disintegration Disorder" (IDD) differs from various types of dissociative disorders in several key ways, particularly regarding the nature of identity perception and the underlying psychological mechanisms involved.

Core Identity Confusion vs. Dissociation: In IDD, the primary issue revolves around a profound confusion or disintegration of identity, where individuals struggle to maintain a coherent sense of self that aligns with objective reality. This contrasts with dissociative disorders, such as Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), where there are distinct personality states or identities that emerge, often as a coping mechanism for trauma. In DID, the individual may have multiple identities, but there is typically a more defined separation between these identities, whereas IDD reflects a generalized fragmentation of identity without clear delineation of separate states [1].

Reality Perception: Individuals with IDD may engage in extreme identity claims or reject biological realities, leading to maladaptive behaviors that reflect an evasion of reality. This is distinct from dissociative disorders, where the dissociation involves a disconnection from aspects of consciousness or memory but does not necessarily entail a rejection of objective identity. For instance, those with DID might not remember certain events due to dissociation, but they still have a stable biological identity that they can return to [2].

Functionality and Distress: IDD often leads to significant impairment in social and occupational functioning due to the chaotic nature of identity claims. In contrast, individuals with dissociative disorders may function relatively well outside of their dissociative episodes, although they might experience distress when those episodes occur. The distress in IDD is more continuous and related to the unstable identity itself, rather than episodic dissociation [3].

Coping Mechanisms: In dissociative disorders, the dissociation is often a coping mechanism developed in response to trauma, serving as a protective function to shield the individual from overwhelming experiences. In contrast, IDD appears to reflect a more pervasive and chronic psychological issue, where the individual may not be responding to trauma in the same way but rather engaging in a broader rejection of personal responsibility and objective reality [4].

Therapeutic Approaches: Treatment for IDD would likely focus on reintegrating the individual's sense of self and grounding them in reality through cognitive-behavioral techniques and personal responsibility frameworks. In contrast, therapy for dissociative disorders often involves addressing the trauma that led to the dissociation, working to integrate the different identities or alleviate the dissociative symptoms themselves [5].

In summary, while both "Identity Disintegration Disorder" and dissociative disorders involve challenges related to identity and consciousness, they differ fundamentally in their nature, mechanisms, and impact on individual functioning. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for effective diagnosis and treatment.

Sources

1 Abnormal Psychology: An Integrative Approach 8th Edition by David H. Barlow, Vincent Mark Durand, and Stefan G. Hofmann

2 The Psychology of Freedom by Peter R. Breggin, M.D.

3 the Liberal Mind by Lyle H. Rossiter Jr., M.D.

4 Liberalism is a Mental Disorder: Savage Solutions by Michael Savage, 2005 edition

5 The Personality Disorders Treatment Planner: Includes DSM-5 Updates (PracticePlanners) 2nd Edition by Neil R. Bockian, Julia C. Smith, and Arthur E. Jongsma Jr.

6 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Text Revision Dsm-5-tr 5th Edition by American Psychiatric Association