Dissolving the Supreme Court

 The President of the United States does not have the constitutional authority to "dissolve" the Supreme Court.


Relevant Sections of the Constitution:

Article III, Section 1: This section establishes the judicial power of the United States, stating that it "shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Notably, the power to create or abolish courts lies with Congress, not the President.

Article II, Section 2: While this section gives the President the power to appoint judges to the Supreme Court (with the advice and consent of the Senate), it does not grant the President any authority over the dissolution or reformation of the Court.

Article I, Section 8: This section gives Congress the power to constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court, further emphasizing that the judicial system is under the purview of Congress and not the executive branch.


Historical Information:

The separation of powers is a fundamental principle in the U.S. Constitution, dividing government authority among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. The independence of the judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court, is crucial to maintaining checks and balances within the government. This independence was explicitly designed to ensure that no one branch, including the executive, could control or dissolve another.


Related Court Cases:

Marbury v. Madison (1803): This landmark case established the principle of judicial review, asserting the power of the Supreme Court to declare acts of Congress and the executive branch unconstitutional. This case strengthened the judiciary’s role as an independent and co-equal branch of government, ensuring that the President could not unilaterally undermine the Court's authority [1].

United States v. Nixon (1974): In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that President Nixon had to comply with a subpoena for tapes during the Watergate scandal, further affirming the principle that even the President is not above the law. It also demonstrated the judiciary's ability to check the executive branch's power [5].

In conclusion, the President does not have the constitutional authority to dissolve the Supreme Court; such a move would violate the separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary. Any changes to the structure or composition of the courts would require legislative action by Congress.

Sources

1 On the Constitution of the United States by Joseph Story

2 The United States Supreme Court Edited by Christopher Tomlins

3 U.S. Constitution for Everyone by Mort Green

4 The Constitution of the United States of America as Amended. Unratified Amendments. Analytical Index by Henry Hyde

5 The Making of America by W. Cleon Skousen


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Just War, An Objective Definition

  Just War Objective Definition: Perceptual Level Roots and Basic Fundamental Axioms: Human beings have inherent rights to life, liberty, and security.  This is a fundamental axiom of just war theory, rooted in the observation that all humans share these basic needs and desires. States have a responsibility to protect their citizens from harm.  This responsibility stems from the social contract between the state and its citizens, where citizens give up some individual freedoms in exchange for the state's protection. War is a last resort.  This means that all other peaceful means of resolving a conflict must be exhausted before resorting to war. This axiom recognizes the destructive nature of war and the importance of seeking peaceful solutions whenever possible. War must be fought with proportionality.  This means that the force used must be proportionate to the threat posed by the enemy. This axiom aims to minimize unnecessary suffering and destruction. War must be fought with dis
Read more

The Impact of Reduced Working Hours (1) on the Economy: A Free Market Analysis

  The Impact of Reduced Working Hours on the Economy: A Free Market Analysis  In a free market economy, where supply and demand dictate prices and production, a reduction in the number of hours worked per day by workers can have significant consequences across the entire economic system. This essay will explore the chain reaction that starts with reduced working hours and culminates in a decrease in the standard of living for the average worker. Reduced Working Hours and Aggregate Productivity: When workers put in fewer hours, the total output produced naturally decreases. This decline in aggregate productivity directly impacts the overall supply of goods and services in the economy. With fewer goods and services available, the scarcity principle dictates that their prices will rise. Decreased Aggregate Production and Aggregate Supply: The reduced output caused by fewer working hours directly translates to a decrease in aggregate production. This decline in production further exacerbat
Read more

11 Commandments of Rationality

People who break/disobey many of these 11 commandments, like George Floyd did, tend to have a shorter life expectancy rate. Honoring him is like honoring the bad for being the bad. 1) be a producer and not a parasite (moocher or looter) 2) don't be addicted to street drugs 3) don't overdose on drugs 4) don't be an alcoholic or smoke  5) don't be a criminal 6) don't physically fight the cops 7) be rational: follow reality and reason and not emotionalism, subjectivism, or fantasies, and adhere to rational principles as the guide to decisions and actions 8) be healthy, wealthy, wise, honest, independent, prudent, with high self-esteem, and don't compromise your integrity 9) pursue knowledge of reality and objective truth 10) pursue rational self-interest, follow individualism, limited government, and capitalism 11) initiation of force and violation of natural rights is prohibited, while the perfect right of self defense is allowed Here is a more elegant and refined
Read more