(2) Israel is fighting a just and righteous war against the Palestinian terrorists and terrorist sympathizers
In considering the question of why the war of Israel against the Palestinians/terrorists is seen as just and righteous for Israel and not for the Palestinians/terrorists, it is important to approach the topic with reason and an objective analysis of the available information. By examining the relevant documents [1][2][3][4][5][6], we can shed light on the underlying principles that guide our understanding.
Firstly, it is essential to recognize that justice is not determined by subjective emotions or desires, but by adherence to objective principles. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a complex and multifaceted issue, with historical, political, and ideological dimensions. Israel, as a sovereign nation, has the right to defend itself against any threats to its security and the safety of its citizens [2]. This right is grounded in the principles of self-defense and the protection of individual rights, which are fundamental aspects of a just and righteous war [4].
From a philosophical standpoint, it is crucial to understand the philosophical differences between the two sides. Israel, as a country founded on the principles of reason, individualism, and capitalism, seeks to protect the rights of its citizens and uphold the rule of law. The Palestinians, on the other hand, have been largely influenced by collectivism, statism, and ideologies such as socialism and Marxism [5]. These contrasting philosophical underpinnings often lead to divergent views on the nature of the conflict and its justifiability.
Furthermore, it is essential to examine the actions of the respective parties involved. Israel has consistently sought to minimize civilian casualties and collateral damage in its military operations [6]. While mistakes and unintended consequences can occur in any conflict, Israel's commitment to the principle of proportionality and its efforts to distinguish between combatants and non-combatants demonstrate a restraint and moral responsibility that the Palestinians/terrorists often fail to uphold [1].
It is also important to address the issue of terrorism, as it plays a significant role in this conflict. Terrorism, by its very nature, is an immoral and unjust tactic that deliberately targets innocent civilians in order to achieve political objectives. Israel's fight against terrorism can be seen as a just and righteous endeavor, as it seeks to protect its citizens from constant threats and ensure the stability and security of its nation [3].
In conclusion, the view that the war of Israel against the Palestinians/terrorists is considered a just and righteous war for Israel and not for the Palestinians/terrorists is based on an objective analysis of the principles, actions, and ideologies involved. Israel's commitment to self-defense, individual rights, and the rule of law, coupled with its efforts to minimize casualties and combat terrorism, provide a rational basis for considering its actions as just and righteous. However, it is important to approach this topic with intellectual honesty and engage in open dialogue to foster understanding and seek peaceful resolutions to this long-standing conflict.
Sources:
Understanding Objectivism by Leonard Peikoff. Edited by Michael S. Berliner
Logical Leap by David Harriman
The Objectivist by Ayn Rand
The DIM Hypothesis by Leonard Peikoff
Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology by Ayn Rand
The Objectivist Newsletter by Ayn Rand
No comments:
Post a Comment