I don't feel any white guilt for slavery 200 years ago

 I don't feel any white guilt for slavery 200 years ago


Undeniable Self-Evident Axiom:

The actions of our ancestors do not directly determine our personal feelings or emotions now.


Poly-syllogism 1:

Slavery occurred 200 years ago.

The individuals living today did not directly participate in or benefit from slavery.

Therefore, the individuals living today do not bear personal responsibility for slavery.


Poly-syllogism 2:

Feeling guilt requires a personal connection to the action or event.

The individuals living today do not have a personal connection to the action of slavery.

Therefore, the individuals living today do not feel personal guilt for slavery.


Theorem 1:

 The individuals living today do not bear personal responsibility or feel personal guilt for slavery that occurred 200 years ago.


Axioms of Conservatism:

From theorem 1: Individuals are responsible for their own actions and cannot be held accountable for the actions of others in the past.

Guilt should be based on personal wrongdoing, not inherited or collective guilt.


Axioms of Objectivism:

Individuals have the right to their own thoughts, feelings, and values.

Moral judgment should be based on objective principles rather than subjective emotions.


Principles of Laissez-Faire/Free Market Capitalism:

The principle of individual rights, which includes the right to life, liberty, and property.

The principle of voluntary exchange and free markets, where individuals are free to engage in mutually beneficial transactions.


Main premise: 

The lack of feeling white guilt for slavery 200 years ago.


Additional premises:

Slavery was an immoral practice that violated the principles of individual rights and liberty.

The actions of individuals in the past cannot be attributed to individuals in the present.

The concept of guilt should be based on personal wrongdoing and not inherited or collective guilt.


Theorems:

Individuals cannot be held responsible for actions they did not commit.

Feeling guilt for actions committed by others in the past is not a rational or objective response.

The absence of white guilt for slavery 200 years ago is justified based on the principles of individual responsibility and objective moral judgment.


Conclusion:

Theorem: 

The lack of feeling white guilt for slavery 200 years ago is justified based on the principles of individual responsibility, objective moral judgment, and the understanding that individuals cannot be held accountable for actions they did not commit.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Impact of Reduced Working Hours (1) on the Economy: A Free Market Analysis

  The Impact of Reduced Working Hours on the Economy: A Free Market Analysis  In a free market economy, where supply and demand dictate prices and production, a reduction in the number of hours worked per day by workers can have significant consequences across the entire economic system. This essay will explore the chain reaction that starts with reduced working hours and culminates in a decrease in the standard of living for the average worker. Reduced Working Hours and Aggregate Productivity: When workers put in fewer hours, the total output produced naturally decreases. This decline in aggregate productivity directly impacts the overall supply of goods and services in the economy. With fewer goods and services available, the scarcity principle dictates that their prices will rise. Decreased Aggregate Production and Aggregate Supply: The reduced output caused by fewer working hours directly translates to a decrease in aggregate production. This decline in production further ...
Read more

Just War, An Objective Definition

  Just War Objective Definition: Perceptual Level Roots and Basic Fundamental Axioms: Human beings have inherent rights to life, liberty, and security.  This is a fundamental axiom of just war theory, rooted in the observation that all humans share these basic needs and desires. States have a responsibility to protect their citizens from harm.  This responsibility stems from the social contract between the state and its citizens, where citizens give up some individual freedoms in exchange for the state's protection. War is a last resort.  This means that all other peaceful means of resolving a conflict must be exhausted before resorting to war. This axiom recognizes the destructive nature of war and the importance of seeking peaceful solutions whenever possible. War must be fought with proportionality.  This means that the force used must be proportionate to the threat posed by the enemy. This axiom aims to minimize unnecessary suffering and destruction. War mus...
Read more

Israel (1) is fighting a just and righteous war against the Palestinian terrorists and terrorist sympathizers

 (1) Israel is fighting a  just and righteous war against the Palestinian terrorists and terrorist sympathizers In examining the war between Israel and the Palestinians/terrorists, it is important to consider the principles of conservatism and delve into the reasons why this conflict is perceived as a just and righteous war for Israel, while it may not be viewed similarly for the Palestinians/terrorists. Firstly, conservatism places great importance on maintaining law and order, upholding the rule of law, and protecting the sovereignty and security of a nation  [1] . From this perspective, Israel's war against the Palestinians/terrorists can be seen as just and righteous because it aims to safeguard the safety and well-being of its citizens. Israel has a responsibility to protect its people from acts of terrorism and preserve its territorial integrity  [2] . Secondly, conservatism values the preservation of traditional values and the promotion of individual freedoms ...
Read more