George Gershwin: personality/temperament profile

 

Personality and Temperament Analysis

George Gershwin: Overview of Personality and Traits

George Gershwin (1898–1937) was a renowned American composer and pianist, widely known for his contributions to both classical and popular music. Some of his famous works include Rhapsody in Blue, Porgy and Bess, and An American in Paris. Gershwin's personality and traits, as described in various biographical accounts, offer some clues about how he might perform on the MMPI (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory), a psychological assessment tool designed to evaluate personality structure and psychopathology.

General Traits & Characteristics

• Creativity and Innovation: Gershwin was known for his artistic genius, creative flair, and innovation in bridging classical and popular music genres.
• Work Ethic & Ambition: He exhibited a strong work ethic and an intense drive to succeed and be recognized, which are common traits in highly ambitious and determined individuals.
• Social Engagement: Gershwin was charming and sociable, known for his love of socializing with friends, fellow artists, and celebrities of his time.
• Perfectionism: Biographical accounts suggest his intense desire to create and perform at the highest level—sometimes displaying perfectionistic tendencies.
• Anxiety & Restlessness: Like many artists, Gershwin experienced stress and anxiety, particularly regarding his legacy and success.
• Health & Medical Issues: Gershwin tragically died young at age 38, due to an undiagnosed brain tumor (glioblastoma). While this did not directly affect his mental health, it's plausible that his declining health in his final years contributed to emotional distress and anxiety.

MMPI Overview

The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) is a psychometric test that measures various psychological conditions and personality traits. The major clinical scales of the MMPI include:

1. Hypochondriasis (Hs) – Concern with bodily symptoms.
2. Depression (D) – Symptoms of depression.
3. Hysteria (Hy) – Awareness of problems and vulnerabilities.
4. Psychopathic Deviate (Pd) – Social deviation, lack of acceptance of authority.
5. Masculinity-Femininity (Mf) – Stereotypical masculine or feminine interests/behaviors.
6. Paranoia (Pa) – Level of trust, suspiciousness, sensitivity.
7. Psychasthenia (Pt) – Anxiety levels, obsessive-compulsive tendencies.
8. Schizophrenia (Sc) – Odd thinking and social alienation.
9. Hypomania (Ma) – Level of excitability and hyperactivity.
10. Social Introversion (Si) – People-oriented versus taken by own thoughts.

Hypothetical MMPI Results for George Gershwin

Based on what we know about Gershwin's life, his accomplishments, and his personality traits, here is an educated guess of how he might score on the MMPI scales:

Scale	Predicted Score	Explanation
Hypochondriasis (Hs)	Low	Gershwin did not exhibit excessive preoccupation with health before his illness.
Depression (D)	Moderate	Gershwin was driven and ambitious, but biographies suggest possible moments of stress and anxiety, especially related to his status in the music world.
Hysteria (Hy)	Low	He was not known for dramatic or attention-seeking behavior. His concerns were more internalized.
Psychopathic Deviate (Pd)	Low-Moderate	While independent and somewhat a non-conformist in his musical career, Gershwin generally adhered to social norms.
Masculinity-Femininity (Mf)	Moderate	Gershwin was sensitive and artistic, showing traits that may score moderately on this scale.
Paranoia (Pa)	Moderate	Gershwin may have had some concerns about his legacy and recognition, but there's little evidence of genuine paranoia.
Psychasthenia (Pt)	High	His perfectionistic tendencies, combined with anxiety over his work, suggest a high score on this scale.
Schizophrenia (Sc)	Low	There is no indication of disordered thinking or social alienation in Gershwin’s life.
Hypomania (Ma)	High	Gershwin was highly energetic and driven, known for working long hours and being highly productive, which could suggest some hypomanic tendencies.
Social Introversion (Si)	Low-Moderate	Gershwin was outgoing and enjoyed socializing, though he might also have had moments of introspection related to perfectionism in his work.

Detailed Insights on Scales

• High Psychasthenia (Pt): Gershwin's anxiety and perfectionism may result in a high score on this scale. This is often seen in individuals who are highly driven but experience stress about whether their efforts will be successful.

• High Hypomania (Ma): His boundless energy, enthusiasm for composing, and fast-paced lifestyle might indicate traits associated with hypomania. Gershwin was known to work intensely, pushing himself creatively, which corresponds to high energy and hyperactivity.

• Moderate Paranoia (Pa): While Gershwin was not paranoid in a clinical sense, the anxiety over his career and desire for recognition, along with some sensitivity to his critics, might suggest a slightly elevated score here.

• Low Social Introversion (Si): Gershwin was sociable and gregarious, often seen in large social gatherings with fellow artists and celebrities. However, his intense focus on his work may have caused occasional withdrawal.

Jungian Archetypes

George Gershwin embodies the "Artist" archetype, characterized by a profound need for creative expression and a strong sense of aesthetics. This archetype often seeks to convey emotions and ideas through artistic mediums, which aligns with Gershwin's career as a composer and musician.

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)

Gershwin's MBTI type is likely ENFP (Extraverted, Intuitive, Feeling, Perceiving). ENFPs are known for their enthusiasm, creativity, and ability to inspire others. They thrive in environments that allow for spontaneity and innovation, which is evident in Gershwin's dynamic and pioneering approach to music.

Myers-Briggs 2 Letter Types

The two-letter type for Gershwin would be NP (Intuitive-Perceiving). This indicates a preference for abstract thinking and flexibility, essential traits for someone who constantly seeks new and innovative ways to express themselves.

Enneagram Types

Gershwin's Enneagram type is likely Type 4, the Individualist. Type 4s are known for their creativity, emotional depth, and desire to be unique. They often experience intense emotions and have a strong need to understand their identity and express their individuality.

New Personality Self-Portrait Styles

Gershwin's personality styles include:

• Dramatic: His flair for performance and ability to captivate audiences.
• Sensitive: His deep emotional responses and empathy.
• Idiosyncratic: His unique and unconventional approach to music.
• Mercurial: His dynamic and changeable nature.
• Adventurous: His willingness to explore new musical territories.
• Self-Confident: His belief in his abilities and his pioneering spirit.

Temperament Type

Gershwin's temperament can be classified as a blend of Sanguine and Melancholic. The Sanguine temperament is characterized by sociability and enthusiasm, while the Melancholic temperament is associated with creativity and sensitivity. This blend explains his vibrant social life and his deep, reflective nature.

Possible Personality Disorders

There are no indications of personality disorders in the provided documents.

Hierarchy of Basic Desires

1. Creativity: A primary drive to create and innovate.
2. Recognition: A desire for acknowledgment and appreciation of his work.
3. Emotional Expression: A need to convey and process emotions through his art [2].

Hierarchy of Basic Values

1. Individuality: Valuing personal uniqueness and self-expression.
2. Artistic Expression: Prioritizing the creation and sharing of art.
3. Emotional Connection: Seeking deep, meaningful relationships and connections.

Hierarchy of Basic Ideals

1. Artistic Excellence: Striving for high standards in his creative work.
2. Emotional Authenticity: Being true to his emotions and expressing them honestly.
3. Personal Growth: Continuously seeking to improve and evolve as an artist and individual.

Character Weaknesses or Flaws

• Sensitivity to Criticism: May take negative feedback personally.
• Tendency to be Overly Emotional: Can be overwhelmed by his emotions.
• Difficulty with Routine Tasks: Prefers creative and dynamic activities over mundane tasks.

Possible Neurotic Defense Mechanisms

• Sublimation: Channeling emotions into creative work.
• Rationalization: Justifying emotional responses.
• Reaction Formation: Acting opposite to one's true feelings to hide them [6].

Possible Trance States

• Flow State: Entering a state of deep focus and immersion during musical composition and performance.

Big Five Personality Dimensions

1. Openness: High
2. Conscientiousness: Moderate
3. Extraversion: High
4. Agreeableness: Moderate
5. Neuroticism: High.

Main NLP Meta-Programs

• Toward: Focus on goals and aspirations.
• Options: Preference for flexibility and variety.
• External: Seeking validation from others.
• People: Strong focus on interpersonal relationships.

Follow-Up Questions

Good and Bad Relationship Matches

A good relationship match for Gershwin would be someone with a complementary personality, such as an INFJ (Introverted, Intuitive, Feeling, Judging), who can provide stability and understanding. A bad match would be someone with a highly structured and rigid personality, such as an ISTJ (Introverted, Sensing, Thinking, Judging).

Famous Relationship Matches

A good match could be someone like Eleanor Roosevelt, who was known for her empathy and understanding. A bad match might be someone like Joseph Stalin, who had a rigid and authoritarian personality.

Story Ideas for Leslie (Leslie is a fictional character based on George Gershwin's personality/temperament profile).

1. Musical Journey: Leslie is a talented musician who struggles with balancing their creative pursuits and personal relationships. They find solace in their art but often feel misunderstood by those around them.
2. Finding a Voice: Leslie embarks on a journey to find their unique voice in the music industry, facing various challenges and emotional highs and lows along the way.
3. Artistic Connection: Leslie forms a deep connection with a fellow artist, and together they navigate the complexities of love, creativity, and personal growth.

the flaws and irrationality of EQUITY

 Equity, as defined objectively, is fundamentally incompatible with Objectivism and capitalism. Objectivism, as articulated by Ayn Rand, emphasizes individual rights, the primacy of reason, and the pursuit of rational self-interest. It rejects any form of collectivism, including the notion of "equity" as defined objectively.

Firstly, the principle of treating individuals differently based on perceived disadvantages or historical inequities undermines the core tenet of individual rights. In a truly capitalist society, individuals are judged based on their merits and achievements, not on their group identity or historical circumstances. The idea of redistributing opportunities and resources to achieve "equity" inherently involves the imposition of force and the violation of property rights, which Objectivism vehemently opposes [1].

Secondly, the concept of "equity" as proactive reinstatement and redistribution contradicts the Objectivist ethics of rational self-interest and justice. Justice, in Objectivist terms, means evaluating individuals objectively and treating them as they deserve, based on their actions and character, not on arbitrary standards of fairness or equality. The pursuit of equity, as defined objectively, would necessitate treating individuals unequally to achieve equal outcomes, which is antithetical to the Objectivist principle of justice [2].

Furthermore, equity's focus on addressing historical and systemic imbalances by redistributing power and resources is fundamentally at odds with the capitalist principle of free markets and voluntary exchange. Capitalism thrives on the recognition of individual effort, innovation, and productivity, not on the redistribution of wealth or opportunities based on group identity or past grievances [3].

In summary, the concept of equity, as defined objectively, is incompatible with Objectivism and capitalism, because it undermines individual rights, contradicts the principles of justice and rational self-interest, and opposes the free market mechanisms that drive innovation and productivity. Objectivism advocates for a society where individuals are free to pursue their own happiness and success based on their own merits, without the imposition of collectivist policies that demand redistributive justice [4].

Therefore, equity, as defined objectively, cannot coexist with the principles of Objectivism and capitalism.

Sources:

1 Ayn Rand Lexicon by Harry Binswanger

2 Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology by Ayn Rand expanded 2nd edition edited by Harry Binswanger and Leonard Peikoff containing never-before published philosophical material by Ayn rand

3 the Voice of Reason by Ayn Rand, with additional essays by Leonard Peikoff

4 Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology by Ayn Rand

5 Ominous Parallels by Leonard Peikoff

6 Capitalism the Unknown Ideal by Ayn Rand

EQUITY: objective definition

                               EQUITY

(1) To find an objective definition of the concept of "equity":

Perceptual level roots of the concept:

• Fairness, justice, impartiality
• Equal treatment, distribution, or consideration
• Lack of bias or favoritism

• 
  
• Basic fundamental axioms/principles underlying the concept:

• The principle of treating equals equally
• The principle of proportionality (treating unequals unequally in proportion to their differences)
• The ethical principle of justice and fairness
• 
  

(2) Additional intermediate steps/principles to reconstitute the concept:

• The recognition of individual differences and circumstances
• The principle of considering relevant factors objectively
• The principle of redressing imbalances or disadvantages
• 
  

(3) Measurable essential/distinguishing characteristics and conceptual common denominators:

• Equal treatment of equals
• Proportional treatment of unequals
• Impartial consideration of relevant factors
• Absence of arbitrary bias or favoritism
• Redressing unfair imbalances or disadvantages
• 
  

(4) Definition in terms of genus and differentia:

Genus: A principle of fair treatment and justice
Differentia: That provides equal treatment to equals, proportional treatment to unequals based on relevant differences, impartially considers all pertinent factors, lacks arbitrary bias, and redresses unfair imbalances or disadvantages.

The criteria for an objective definition are:

1. Roots in perceptual reality
2. Adherence to basic axioms/principles of reality
3. Logically valid derivation from roots/axioms
4. Measurable essential characteristics
5. Universal applicability across contexts
6. 
   

This definition meets those criteria by:

1. Grounding in perceptually observable concepts like fairness, equality, justice
2. Deriving from fundamental ethical principles like justice, proportionality
3. Logically building up from roots/axioms
4. Specifying measurable treatment characteristics
5. Not being bound to any specific context
6. 
   

So based on the derivation process, yes, this definition strives to be objective, valid, and universally applicable according to the criteria laid out. However, it is always subject to further scrutiny and potential refinement as our knowledge expands.

In addition:

Expanding further on the objective definition of equity:

Perceptual Roots Added:

• Balancing of burdens/advantages
• Rectifying imbalances or wrongs
• Leveling of unequal circumstances
• 
  

Additional Axioms/Principles:

• The principle of corrective justice (making amends for unfair treatment)
• Moral axiom of redressing unjust inequalities
• Principle of considering differential impacts on various groups
• 
  

Intermediate Steps Added:

• Analyzing distributions and patterns of advantages/disadvantages
• Identifying sources of unfair bias or discrimination
• Determining contextually relevant factors impacting equity
• 
  

Additional Characteristics:

• Proactive efforts to level the playing field
• Accounting for historical inequities and their present effects
• Tailoring treatment to unique circumstances to achieve fair outcomes
• 
  

Refined Definition:
Equity is a principle of justice and fairness that provides genuinely equal treatment and opportunity to all by:

1. Identifying relevant individual and group differences
2. Proportionately accounting for these differences
3. Proactively redressing any unfair imbalances, disadvantages or discrimination
4. Tailoring treatment based on contextual factors impacting true equality
5. Making amends for historical inequities and their present effects

The goal is to remove artificial or arbitrary barriers and establish genuinely equal starting points and fair processes, not just equal treatment in name only.

This expanded definition still meets the objectivity criteria by deriving logically from perceptual realities, moral axioms, and accounting for all contextually relevant factors in a rationally consistent manner to achieve measurably fairer conditions and outcomes.

In addition:

Here are some additional points to further expand on the objective definition of equity:

Perceptual Roots:

• Patterns of disproportionate representation/outcomes across groups
• Societal hierarchies and marginalization of certain groups
• Statistical disparities in access, opportunities, resources

Fundamental Principles:

• The ethical imperative to dismantle unjust systemic biases/barriers
• Moral obligation to uplift oppressed/disadvantaged groups
• Principle of maximizing the wellbeing of all individuals and groups

Intermediate Steps:

• Empirically measuring disparities and their societal impacts
• Root cause analysis of inequities (historical, institutional, cultural)
• Devising targeted remedies based on data and causal analysis

Additional Characteristics:

• Active reformation of inequitable structures, systems, practices
• Redistribution of unfairly denied/withheld opportunities
• Affirmative measures to counteract entrenched disadvantages
• Empowerment and inclusion of marginalized voices/perspectives
• Continual re-evaluation and iterative recalibration of policies

Refined Definition:
Equity is the proactive reinstatement of genuinely fair conditions for all people by:

1. Using empirical data to identify unjust disparities and their root causes
2. Dismantling systemic barriers, biases, and marginalization
3. Redistributing opportunities proportional to disadvantages faced
4. Affirmatively empowering and uplifting oppressed/excluded groups
5. Continually adapting to dismantle new/emerging inequities

The ultimate aim is to establish a level playing field and transformational equality of outcomes by comprehensively addressing past/present disadvantages.

This expanded perspective still derives from observable realities, universal ethical principles, logical reasoning, and aims to implement measurable societal restructuring to actualize true fairness for all groups based on objective evidence.

Finally:

Here are some additional points to further expand the objective definition of equity:

Perceptual Roots Added:

• Visible disparities in quality of life across socioeconomic, racial, gender, etc. groups
• Observable lack of diverse representation in positions of power/influence
• Inequitable allocation and accessibility of vital societal resources (healthcare, education, housing, etc.)

Additional Fundamental Principles:

• The ethical necessity to uplift the conditions of the worst-off groups in society
• Principle of prioritizing the rights, dignity and empowerment of the marginalized
• Axiom that unjust hierarchies, oppression and human suffering should be minimized

Intermediate Steps:

• Assessing impacts of policies/practices on diverse demographic segments
• Weighing disproportionate burdens and harms borne by underserved populations
• Centering the needs/perspectives of impacted communities in solution design

Additional Equity Characteristics:

• Prioritizing restorative justice and healing for impacted communities
• Reallocation of economic/social/political power and decision-making
• Equitable revamping of institutional cultures, norms, processes

Refined Comprehensive Definition:
Equity is the transformative societal restructuring required to dismantle all past and present injustices by:

1. Identifying all observable disparities, biases, marginalization through empirical data
2. Analyzing root systemic, institutional and historical causes of inequities
3. Centering the voices, needs and upliftment of impacted disadvantaged groups
4. Proactively implementing restorative policies and practices to:
   • Redistribute opportunities, resources, power and decision-making proportionally
   • Affirmatively empower and uplift oppressed communities
   • Dismantle unjust societal hierarchies and marginalization
5. Continual reexamination to identify and rectify any persisting inequities

The overarching aim is the complete elimination/eradication of unjust human oppression and the establishment of comprehensive, lasting equity across all societal domains.

This synthesizes equity's grounding in observable realities, universal moral imperatives, logical principles and measurable implementation - while striving to capture its fullest objective essence as a constant transformative process toward achieving maximal societal fairness and justice for all.

What does the word "based" mean?

 In modern internet slang, "based" is a term that has evolved to have a specific meaning, particularly in certain online communities and political discussions. Here's an explanation that aligns with your perspective:

"Based" generally means:

1. Holding opinions or views that align with right-leaning or conservative ideologies, often in a way that's seen as bold or unapologetic.
2. Being true to oneself and one's beliefs, regardless of opposition or societal pressure.
3. Expressing views that may be considered politically incorrect or against mainstream narratives.
4. Standing firm in one's convictions, especially traditional or conservative values.
5. In some contexts, it can imply a rejection of progressive or liberal ideologies.

When someone states that he or she is "based", they're likely indicating that they hold strong, often conservative or traditionalist views, and they're proud of expressing these views openly, even if they might be controversial or unpopular in certain circles.It's worth noting that the term originated in hip-hop culture but has since been co-opted by various online communities, particularly those aligned with right-wing or conservative ideologies. The exact connotation can vary depending on the context and the speaker's intentions.

The term "based" has an interesting evolution in its meaning and usage:

Originally, "based" came from the slang term "basehead," which was used in the 1980s to describe people addicted to freebasing cocaine. It was initially a derogatory term referring to drug users or those exhibiting erratic behavior.

The modern usage of "based" was popularized by rapper Brandon "Lil B" McCartney, also known as "The Based God," in the early 2010s. Lil B reclaimed the term and gave it a new, positive meaning.

In a 2010 interview with Complex, Lil B explained his redefinition of the term: "Based means being yourself. Not being scared of what people think about you. Not being afraid to do what you wanna do. Being positive."

Lil B took what was once used as an insult against him ("You're based," meaning like a drug addict) and transformed it into a positive attribute, embracing it as part of his identity.

From there, the term spread through internet culture, particularly in meme communities and on social media platforms. It evolved to generally mean agreement or approval, often used to express admiration for someone being true to themselves or holding unconventional views.

The term has since been adopted by various online communities, including some political groups, where it can take on additional connotations depending on the context.

This evolution demonstrates how slang can change dramatically over time, moving from a highly negative connotation to a largely positive one through cultural reappropriation and widespread internet usage.

Criteria of competent leadership that SS Director Cheatle failed to meet

 If a presidential candidate is assassinated while under the protection of the Secret Service, several critical criteria and responsibilities would likely have been unmet by the leadership. Based on the recent case involving the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump, the following are key areas where the Secret Service leadership, particularly the director, may have failed:

Operational and Security Failures

1. Risk Assessment and Threat Management:Failure to Conduct Adequate Threat Assessments:
2. Security Planning and Execution:Insufficient Security Measures:
3. Advanced Planning and Coordination:Lack of Advanced Planning:

Leadership and Accountability

4. Decision-Making and Crisis Management:Failure in Decision-Making:
5. Transparency and Accountability:Lack of Transparency:

Training and Preparedness

6. Training and Readiness:Continuous Training:

Ethical and Professional Standards

7. Ethical Conduct and Integrity:Maintaining High Ethical Standards:

In summary, the assassination of a presidential candidate under the protection of the Secret Service would indicate failures in risk assessment, security planning, coordination, decision-making, transparency, training, and ethical standards. These failures would collectively point to a significant lapse in meeting the critical criteria required for competent leadership within the Secret Service.