Overthrowing a tyranny is not the same objective concept as an insurrection

The "perfect right and duty of the people to overthrow  a tyranny and replace it with a non-tyranny" is not the same objective concept as an "insurrection".

To determine whether an insurrection is the same objective concept as the right and duty of people to overthrow a tyranny and replace it with a non-tyranny, we can evaluate each definition based on their essential characteristics and principles.

Objective Definition of Insurrection:

1. Perceptual Roots and Fundamental Axioms:

   • Actions: Defiance, rebellion, uprising by a group.
   • Use or threat of violence/force.
   • Opposing established authority/leadership/government.
   • Disrupting law, order, and peace.

2. Intermediate Steps/Principles:

   • Dissatisfaction with authority/leadership.
   • Perceiving injustice, oppression, lack of rights.
   • Organizing into a defiant movement to challenge authority.
   • Taking militant actions like protests, riots, armed uprising.

3. Essential Characteristics:

   • Organized rebellion.
   • By a group of people.
   • Against established authority/leadership/government.
   • Using violence, force, or threat of force.
   • Aim to resist, disrupt, overthrow, or take control.

4. Definition:

   • An insurrection is a violent uprising or rebellion by an organized group of people against established authority, leadership, or government, involving the use or threat of force with the aim to resist, disrupt, overthrow, or take control.

Objective Definition of the Right and Duty to Overthrow a Tyranny:

1. Perceptual Roots and Fundamental Axioms:

   • People (human beings).
   • Rights (moral principles governing conduct).
   • Duties/obligations.
   • Actions (overthrowing, replacing).
   • Entities (tyranny, non-tyranny/government).

2. Intermediate Steps/Principles:

   • Define "tyranny" (unjust, oppressive government/rule).
   • Define "non-tyranny" (just, rights-respecting government).
   • Criteria for when overthrowing government is justified.
   • Methods/processes for overthrowing and replacing government.

3. Essential Characteristics:

   • People as the sovereign source of political legitimacy.
   • Rights of people take precedence over government.
   • Duty to rebel against unjust/tyrannical rule.
   • Replacing unjust system with just system of government.

4. Definition:

   • Human beings possess an inherent moral right, as well as a civic duty, to overthrow and replace an unjust, tyrannical system of government with a rights-respecting, non-tyrannical form of governance when the existing regime violates the inherent rights and sovereign authority of the people.

Comparison and Judgment:

• Commonalities:

  • Both concepts involve organized collective action against an existing government.
  • Both imply a response to perceived injustice or oppression by the ruling authorities.
  • Both involve the use of force or threat of force (insurrection explicitly, and potentially in overthrowing tyranny if peaceful means are not viable).

• Differences:

  • Purpose and Justification:

    • Insurrection: The primary goal is to resist, disrupt, overthrow, or take control of an established authority, often without explicit moral justification. It focuses on the act of rebellion itself.
    • Right and Duty to Overthrow Tyranny: This concept includes a moral and ethical framework, emphasizing the right and duty of people to replace a tyrannical government with a just one. The action is justified by the violation of inherent rights and the pursuit of a rights-respecting government.

  • Outcome Focus:

    • Insurrection: The outcome may simply be the disruption or overthrow of current authorities, not necessarily replacing it with a just system.
    • Right and Duty to Overthrow Tyranny: The outcome must involve replacing the unjust system with a just, non-tyrannical form of governance.

  • Moral and Ethical Framework:

    • Insurrection: Lacks an explicit ethical or moral directive; it is defined by its opposition and use of force.
    • Right and Duty to Overthrow Tyranny: Rooted in ethical principles regarding human rights and just governance.

Conclusion:

An insurrection and the right and duty to overthrow a tyranny are related but not the same objective concepts. An insurrection is a specific type of violent rebellion against authority that does not necessarily have a moral or ethical justification or aim to establish a just system. In contrast, the right and duty to overthrow a tyranny is grounded in moral principles and aims to replace an unjust government with a rights-respecting one. The two concepts can overlap in practice (e.g., a justified insurrection against a tyrannical regime), but they are distinct in their essential characteristics and underlying principles.

AND

Analyzing Insurrection and the Right to Overthrow Tyranny

Based on the provided objective definitions:

Insurrection:

• Genus: Violent uprising or rebellion
• Differentia: By an organized group against established authority, using force to resist, disrupt, overthrow, or take control.

Right and Duty to Overthrow Tyranny:

• Grounding: Inherent human rights, moral principles, and just political authority.
• Action: Overthrowing and replacing an unjust, tyrannical government with a rights-respecting, non-tyrannical one.
• Criteria: Tyranny violates inherent rights and sovereign authority of the people.

Judgment: Are they the same?

No, insurrection and the right to overthrow tyranny are not the same objective concept. While both involve challenging established authority, they differ significantly in their nature and justification.

Key Differences:

• Motivation: Insurrection can be driven by various motives, including dissatisfaction with leadership, perceived injustice, or desire for power. The right to overthrow tyranny specifically focuses on resisting an unjust and oppressive government that violates fundamental rights.
• Methods: Insurrection primarily relies on violence and force. The right to overthrow tyranny, while not excluding the possibility of force, emphasizes the importance of just means and replacing the oppressive system with a non-tyrannical one.
• Justification: Insurrection may not always be justified, depending on the context and motives. The right to overthrow tyranny is specifically justified when a government violates the fundamental rights and sovereignty of the people.

Conclusion

While both concepts involve challenging authority, the right to overthrow tyranny is grounded in specific ethical principles and criteria, focusing on resisting unjust and oppressive rule. Insurrection, on the other hand, is a broader concept encompassing various forms of violent uprisings against established authority, not necessarily tied to specific principles of justice or legitimacy.

Therefore, based on the objective definitions provided, it is inaccurate to equate insurrection with the universally recognized right and duty to overthrow tyranny.

Electoral College is a brilliant way to prevent Tyranny and is not un-American

 Electoral College is a brilliant way to prevent Tyranny and is not un-American

Axiom 1: Axioms of Conservatism

1. Human nature is flawed, and people are not inherently good.
2. Wisdom lies in recognizing the limitations of human nature.
3. Checks and balances are necessary to prevent the abuse of power.

Axiom 2: Axioms of Objectivism

1. Individual rights are fundamental and must be protected.
2. Objective knowledge and reason are the basis for understanding reality.
3. Voluntary interactions lead to the best outcomes.

Axiom 3: Principles of Laissez-Faire/Free Market Capitalism

1. Economic freedom and private property rights promote prosperity and individual liberty.
2. The free market, devoid of government intervention, allocates resources efficiently.
3. Competition and innovation thrive in a free society.

Main Premise: The Electoral College was a brilliant innovation of the founders because they didn't want a democracy, they wanted a republic.

Additional Premise 1: The founders understood the flaws of human nature and the need for checks and balances.
Additional Premise 2: The Electoral College acts as a check on the power of the majority.

Theorem 1: The founders designed the Electoral College to prevent the tyranny of the majority.
Theorem 2: The Electoral College ensures that smaller states have a voice in the presidential election.
Theorem 3: By relying on electors rather than a direct popular vote, the Electoral College protects against potential manipulation or uninformed decisions by the general population.

Conclusion:
The Electoral College was indeed a brilliant innovation of the founders, as it acted as a safeguard against the potential tyranny of the majority and ensured the representation of smaller states. The founders' understanding of human nature and their desire for checks and balances led them to establish this system, aligning with the principles of conservatism, objectivism, and laissez-faire capitalism.

AND

Undeniable Self-Evident Axiom:

1. The founders of the United States desired to establish a system of government that would mitigate the potential dangers of unchecked human power.

Poly-Syllogism 1:
1.1 The founders believed that human nature is flawed and prone to abuse of power.
1.2 Flawed human nature necessitates the implementation of checks and balances in a government system.
1.3 The Electoral College was designed as one of these checks and balances to prevent the concentration of power in the hands of the majority.

Theorem 1: The Electoral College was designed to prevent the concentration of power and to serve as a check on the potential abuses of democracy.

Poly-Syllogism 2:
2.1 The founders desired a republican form of government rather than a pure democracy.
2.2 A republican form of government provides a system of representation that allows for the balancing of diverse interests.
2.3 The Electoral College serves as a mechanism for ensuring that diverse interests across the nation are represented in the election of the president.

Theorem 2: The Electoral College was a brilliant innovation of the founders because it promotes the principles of republican governance and ensures the representation of diverse interests.

Poly-Syllogism 3:
3.1 The founders recognized the importance of limiting the power of any single branch of government.
3.2 They established three branches of government to serve as checks on one another.
3.3 The Electoral College, as a mechanism for selecting the president, provides an additional layer of checks and balances within the executive branch.

Theorem 3: The Electoral College, as part of the system of checks and balances established by the founders, contributes to the overall stability and effectiveness of the government.

In conclusion, 

the Electoral College was a brilliant innovation of the founders because it serves as a check on potential abuses of democracy, promotes the principles of republican governance, ensures the representation of diverse interests, and contributes to the stability and effectiveness of the government.

Benefits of nationalism & primacy of nationalism over globalism

 

nationalism has primacy over globalism

Undeniable Self-Evident Axiom:

1. Every nation has the right to prioritize its own interests and well-being.

Poly-Syllogism 1:
Premise 1: A nation's primary responsibility is to its own citizens.
Premise 2: Nationalism is the ideology that promotes the interests and well-being of a nation.
Conclusion 1: Therefore, nationalism prioritizes the needs and concerns of its own citizens.

Poly-Syllogism 2:
Premise 1: Globalism advocates for a world without borders and seeks to prioritize global cooperation and unity.
Premise 2: The interests and well-being of individual nations may be compromised in pursuit of global goals.
Conclusion 2: Therefore, globalism may not prioritize the needs and concerns of individual nations.

Poly-Syllogism 3:
Premise 1: The well-being and prosperity of a nation contribute to the overall stability and progress of the world.
Premise 2: By prioritizing its own interests, a nation can better ensure the welfare of its citizens.
Conclusion 3: Therefore, nationalism can indirectly contribute to the greater global good.

Poly-Syllogism 4:
Premise 1: Each nation has unique cultural, historical, and social contexts that shape its identity.
Premise 2: Nationalism aims to preserve and promote these distinct national identities.
Conclusion 4: Therefore, nationalism recognizes and values the diversity of nations in the world.

Theorem 1: Based on the above poly-syllogisms, it can be concluded that nationalism has primacy over globalism, as it prioritizes the interests and needs of individual nations, contributes to the greater global good, and values the diversity of nations.

AND

Axioms of Conservatism:

1. Axiom 1: Preservation of national identity and sovereignty is of utmost importance.

Axioms of Objectivism:
2. Axiom 2: Individuals have the right to pursue their own self-interest and happiness.

Principles of Laissez-Faire/Free Market Capitalism:
3. Axiom 3: Free markets and voluntary exchange lead to prosperity and individual freedom.

Main Premise:
4. Nationalism has primacy over globalism.

Additional Premises:
5. Globalism promotes the erosion of national identity and sovereignty.
6. Nationalism fosters a sense of community and shared values among citizens.
7. Globalism often leads to centralized decision-making and undermines individual freedom.

Theorems:
8. Theorem 1: Preserving national identity and sovereignty aligns with the objective of protecting individual rights and promoting individual freedom (Axiom 1 + Axiom 2).
9. Theorem 2: The erosion of national identity and sovereignty, as promoted by globalism, can lead to a loss of cultural diversity and individual liberty (Main Premise + Additional Premise 5).
10. Theorem 3: Nationalism, by fostering a sense of community and shared values, can promote social cohesion and stability within a nation (Main Premise + Additional Premise 6).
11. Theorem 4: Globalism's tendency towards centralized decision-making can limit the ability of individuals to make choices that best serve their self-interests (Additional Premise 7 + Axiom 3).

Final Conclusions (Theorems):
12. Theorem 1: Preserving national identity and sovereignty is essential for protecting individual rights and promoting individual freedom.
13. Theorem 2: The erosion of national identity and sovereignty, as promoted by globalism, can lead to a loss of cultural diversity and individual liberty.
14. Theorem 3: Nationalism, by fostering a sense of community and shared values, can promote social cohesion and stability within a nation.
15. Theorem 4: Globalism's tendency towards centralized decision-making can limit the ability of individuals to make choices that best serve their self-interests.

SO

Benefits and advantages of nationalism & primacy of nationalism over globalism

Nationalism emphasizes the importance of individual rights, limited government, and the primacy of one's own nation over globalist ideologies. There are several benefits and advantages of nationalism that contribute to its primacy over globalism.

1. Protection of Individual Rights: Nationalism recognizes and upholds the rights of individuals within a nation-state. It prioritizes the protection of life, liberty, and property, ensuring that individuals have the freedom to pursue their own goals and values [1].

2. 
   

3. Cultural Preservation: Nationalism values the unique cultural heritage, traditions, and customs of a nation. It recognizes the importance of preserving and promoting national identity, language, and cultural practices, fostering a sense of unity and pride among its citizens [2].

4. 
   

5. Sovereignty and Self-Determination: Nationalism emphasizes the sovereignty of a nation, allowing its citizens to govern themselves according to their own values and interests. It rejects external interference and promotes self-determination, enabling nations to make decisions that best serve their individual needs [3].

6. 
   

7. Economic Prosperity: Nationalism encourages economic policies that prioritize domestic industries and businesses. By protecting domestic markets and promoting trade within the nation, it seeks to create a favorable environment for economic growth, job creation, and increased prosperity [4].

8. 
   

9. National Security: Nationalism recognizes the importance of a strong national defense and the protection of borders. It prioritizes the safety and security of its citizens, ensuring that the nation has the necessary means to defend itself from external threats [5].

10. 
    

11. Political Stability: Nationalism promotes political stability by fostering a sense of unity and shared purpose among citizens. It encourages a cohesive society where individuals have a common understanding of their nation's values and principles, leading to more effective governance and social cohesion [6].

These benefits and advantages of nationalism demonstrate why it has primacy over globalism. By prioritizing the well-being and interests of one's own nation, nationalism provides a framework for individual rights, cultural preservation, economic prosperity, national security, and political stability. It recognizes the importance of upholding the unique characteristics and values of each nation, ensuring that decisions are made in the best interest of its citizens and their pursuit of happiness.

Sources:

1 Philosophy: Who Needs It by Ayn Rand

2 the Virtue of Selfishness by Ayn Rand

3 For the New Intellectual by Ayn Rand

4 the Voice of Reason by Ayn Rand, with additional essays by Leonard Peikoff

5 Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology by Ayn Rand expanded 2nd edition edited by Harry Binswanger and Leonard Peikoff containing never-before published philosophical material by Ayn rand

6 Ayn Rand Lexicon by Harry Binswanger

AND finally

Benefits and advantages of nationalism & primacy of nationalism over globalism

Nationalism is a political ideology that places emphasis on the interests, culture, and sovereignty of a nation-state. It is considered more important than globalism by conservatives due to its numerous benefits and advantages, as highlighted in the retrieved documents.

One of the key benefits of nationalism is the preservation of national identity and cultural heritage [2]. Nationalism fosters a sense of belonging and unity among citizens, allowing them to celebrate their shared history, traditions, and values. This sense of identity strengthens social cohesion and promotes a sense of pride in one's nation.

Furthermore, nationalism promotes national sovereignty and self-determination [1]. By prioritizing the interests of the nation-state, nationalists advocate for policies that protect and enhance national autonomy. This allows nations to make independent decisions on matters such as trade, immigration, and security, ensuring that their unique needs and interests are addressed.

Nationalism also fosters economic benefits [4]. By supporting domestic industries and promoting national economic growth, nationalists aim to protect jobs and ensure the prosperity of their own citizens. This focus on national economic development can lead to increased domestic production, innovation, and competitiveness in the global market.

Moreover, nationalism is often associated with a strong sense of patriotism and national defense [5]. By prioritizing the security and defense of the nation, nationalists advocate for robust military capabilities and the protection of borders. This ensures the safety and well-being of citizens, as well as the preservation of national sovereignty.

Lastly, nationalism promotes political stability and accountability [3]. By emphasizing the importance of national institutions and democratic governance, nationalists aim to uphold the rule of law and ensure effective governance. This can lead to increased trust in government, as well as greater accountability to the interests and values of citizens.

In summary, the benefits and advantages of nationalism include the preservation of national identity, promotion of national sovereignty, economic growth, national defense, and political stability. These reasons contribute to the conservative view that nationalism is more important than globalism, as it prioritizes the interests and well-being of the nation-state. [6]

Sources:

1 Hamilton's Curse by Thomas J. Dilorenzo

2 Arguing With Idiots by Glen Beck

3 How the Left Was Won by Richard Mgrdechian

4 Philosophy, The Federalist, and the Constitution by Morton White

5 Glen Beck's Common Sense by Glen Beck

6 The Philosophy of the American Revolution by Morton White