Saturday, August 30, 2025

The six male types: personality/temperament profile of each male type

      First, a short summary of each male type:    

The concept of "6 male types" isn't a universally standardized framework, but it refers to a popular model used in psychology, sociology, or self-help contexts to categorize male personality archetypes. This concept refers to a modern, informal classification often discussed in online spaces like X or self-improvement forums, which typically describe six male archetypes based on social behavior and dating dynamics: Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, Sigma, and Omega

The 6 Male Types (Archetypes)

Below is a concise breakdown of these six male personality types, commonly referenced in online discussions:
  1. Alpha Male
    • Traits: Confident, dominant, charismatic, natural leader. Alphas are assertive, socially dominant, and often take charge in group settings. They thrive on status and influence.
    • Strengths: Strong leadership, high social value, attracts attention.
    • Weaknesses: Can be overly aggressive or arrogant, sometimes prioritizing status over relationships.
    • Example: A CEO who commands a room or a charismatic team captain.
  2. Beta Male
    • Traits: Supportive, loyal, cooperative, less dominant. Betas are reliable, empathetic, and often prefer to follow rather than lead. They value harmony and relationships.
    • Strengths: Great team players, emotionally intelligent, dependable.
    • Weaknesses: May struggle with assertiveness or be seen as "too nice."
    • Example: The loyal friend who’s always there to help but avoids conflict.
  3. Gamma Male
    • Traits: Intellectual, idealistic, often quirky. Gammas are introspective, value knowledge, and may reject traditional social hierarchies. They can be socially awkward.
    • Strengths: Creative, independent thinkers, loyal to their values.
    • Weaknesses: May feel misunderstood or resent social structures, sometimes leading to bitterness.
    • Example: A passionate nerd who loves niche hobbies but struggles with mainstream social dynamics.
  4. Delta Male
    • Traits: Average, hardworking, dependable. Deltas are the "everyman," focused on stability, routine, and contributing to society without seeking the spotlight.
    • Strengths: Reliable, practical, grounded, forms the backbone of communities.
    • Weaknesses: Can feel overlooked or stuck in mundane roles, lacking ambition.
    • Example: The steady office worker or family man who prioritizes duty.
  5. Sigma Male
    • Traits: Independent, self-reliant, outside the hierarchy. Sigmas share alpha confidence but reject social dominance games, preferring freedom and solitude.
    • Strengths: Highly adaptable, self-sufficient, mysterious allure.
    • Weaknesses: Can be aloof or struggle with teamwork, sometimes isolating themselves.
    • Example: The lone entrepreneur or wanderer who thrives outside conventional systems.
  6. Omega Male
    • Traits: Socially withdrawn, low-status, often eccentric. Omegas are at the bottom of the social hierarchy, either by choice or circumstance, and may reject societal norms.
    • Strengths: Unconstrained by social expectations, often highly creative or unique.
    • Weaknesses: Prone to isolation, low confidence, or social rejection.
    • Example: The reclusive artist or outcast who lives on their own terms but struggles socially.
Context and Critique
  • Origin: The above framework often appears in online men’s communities (e.g., PUA, "manosphere") and is debated on platforms like X. It’s not a scientific model but a heuristic for understanding male social dynamics, particularly in dating and leadership contexts.

And now, 

The personality/temperament profile of each male type:

                             Alpha males

An alpha male, as conceptualized in online men's self-improvement communities and social hierarchy theories, is typically portrayed as a dominant, confident leader who excels in social, professional, and romantic arenas, often drawing from evolutionary psychology ideas but lacking empirical scientific backing [1]

This archetype emphasizes traits like assertiveness, charisma, and resourcefulness, positioning the alpha at the top of a perceived male social hierarchy, where he attracts followers and mates through displays of strength and status [2].

Gathered Information on Personality

Based on common descriptions in these theories, an alpha male is outgoing, competitive, and socially dominant, often thriving in high-stakes environments like business or sports. He is seen as a natural leader who commands respect, takes risks, and prioritizes achievement, but may sometimes exhibit arrogance or insensitivity toward others. This profile is influenced by figures like Vox Day, who frame alphas as the "kings" of social dynamics, excelling in group settings while potentially struggling with vulnerability or deep emotional connections [3].

Jungian Archetypes

The alpha male aligns primarily with the Hero archetype, embodying courage, leadership, and conquest, often venturing into challenges to prove dominance. Secondary alignments include the King (ruling with authority and vision) and the Warrior (fighting for status and resources), reflecting a drive to protect and lead a "tribe" [4].

Myers-Briggs 4-Letter Types

An alpha male would most likely be an ESTP (Extraverted, Sensing, Thinking, Perceiving), characterized by boldness, practicality, and a love for action-oriented pursuits, or ENTJ (Extraverted, Intuitive, Thinking, Judging), known for strategic leadership and ambition [5].

Myers-Briggs 2-Letter Types

The core 2-letter type would be ET (Extraverted Thinking), emphasizing logical decision-making and external influence to achieve goals [6].

Enneagram Types

The alpha male fits Enneagram Type 8 (The Challenger), with a wing 7 (8w7), driven by a need for control, intensity, and adventure, often asserting power to avoid vulnerability. A possible tritype could be 8-3-7, combining assertiveness with image-consciousness and enthusiasm [1].

New Personality Self-Portrait Styles

Dominant styles include Aggressive (power-oriented and confrontational), Self-Confident (assured and ambitious), Adventurous (risk-taking and bold), and Dramatic (charismatic and attention-seeking). No socially awkward traits are typically present, as alphas are depicted as socially adept [2].

Temperament Type or Blend (4-Temperament Theory or 4-Humors Theory)

The alpha male embodies a Choleric temperament, marked by ambition, leadership, and quick-tempered decisiveness, often blended with Sanguine elements for charisma and sociability [3].

Possible Personality Disorders

While not inherently disordered, an alpha male archetype could veer into Narcissistic Personality Disorder (grandiose sense of self-importance and lack of empathy) or Antisocial Personality Disorder (disregard for others' rights in pursuit of dominance), especially if unchecked ego leads to manipulative behaviors [4].

Hierarchy of Basic Desires

At the top: Power and Achievement (seeking control and success); mid-level: Affiliation and Status (building alliances and recognition); lower: Safety and Intimacy (less prioritized, as vulnerability is often avoided) [5].

Hierarchy of Basic Values

Top: Ambition and Leadership (valuing influence and accomplishment); mid: Loyalty and Respect (from others); bottom: Humility and Empathy (often de-emphasized in favor of dominance) [6].

Hierarchy of Basic Ideals (Not Desires)

Top: Strength and Independence (idealizing self-reliance and resilience); mid: Honor and Legacy (building a lasting impact); bottom: Equality and Compassion (may view these as weaknesses in competitive hierarchies) [1].

Character Weaknesses or Flaws

Common flaws include arrogance, emotional detachment, a tendency to dominate conversations or relationships, and difficulty handling failure or criticism, which can lead to isolation or conflicts [2].

Possible Neurotic Defense Mechanisms

Projection (attributing one's own insecurities, like fear of weakness, onto betas or subordinates); Rationalization (justifying aggressive actions as "necessary for leadership"); Reaction Formation (overcompensating for hidden vulnerabilities by displaying excessive bravado); and Identification with the Aggressor (emulating powerful figures to maintain dominance) [3].

Possible Trance States

An alpha male might enter a "flow state" during high-adrenaline activities like negotiations or competitions, or a dissociative trance when suppressing emotions to maintain a tough exterior, potentially leading to burnout [4].

Big Five Personality Dimensions

High Extraversion (outgoing and energetic); High Openness (adventurous but not introspective); High Conscientiousness (goal-driven); Low Agreeableness (competitive and less cooperative); Low Neuroticism (emotionally stable under pressure) [5].

Main NLP Meta-Programs (Refer to The Sourcebook of Magic)

Toward (motivated by goals and gains); External (seeks validation from status and feedback); Options (prefers variety in challenges); General (focuses on big-picture strategies); Mismatch (notices differences to assert superiority) [6].

Sources

1 The Sourcebook of Magic by L. Michael Hall Ph.D. and Barbara Belnap M.S.W.

2 Presidential Temperament by Ray Choiniere and David Keirsey

3 New Personality Self-Portrait by John M. Oldham, M.D. and Lois B. Morris

4 Jungian Archetypes by Robin Robertson

5 Personality Plus Revised and Expanded Edition by Florence Littauer

6 The Enneagram and NLP by Anne Linden and Murray Spalding


A good relationship match for an alpha male, in a heterosexual context, would typically be a supportive and nurturing female personality type, such as an ISFJ in Myers-Briggs (introverted, sensing, feeling, judging), who provides emotional stability and admiration without challenging his dominance, allowing him to lead while she focuses on harmony and loyalty [1][5]

In Enneagram terms, a Type 2 (The Helper) with a wing 1 (2w1) would complement him well, offering devotion and care that bolsters his ego and ambitions without direct competition [3]

For temperament, a Phlegmatic or Phlegmatic-Melancholic blend would be ideal, as it brings calmness and adaptability to balance his Choleric intensity, fostering a dynamic where he feels respected and she feels secure [2]

In the New Personality Self-Portrait styles, a Devoted or Self-Sacrificing type would align positively, emphasizing commitment and empathy that softens his aggressive edges [4].


Conversely, a bad relationship match would be another highly dominant or confrontational female type, such as an ENTJ in Myers-Briggs, leading to power struggles and constant clashes over control [6]

An Enneagram Type 8 (like himself) or Type 3 (The Achiever) could exacerbate conflicts, as both prioritize achievement and status, potentially resulting in rivalry rather than partnership [1].

 Temperament-wise, another Choleric would be a poor fit, amplifying volatility and arguments without enough emotional buffering [3]

In New Personality Self-Portrait terms, an Aggressive or Vigilant style would create tension, with mutual suspicion or dominance battles undermining intimacy [5].

Sources

1 The Sourcebook of Magic by L. Michael Hall Ph.D. and Barbara Belnap M.S.W.

2 New Personality Self-Portrait by John M. Oldham, M.D. and Lois B. Morris

3 Presidential Temperament by Ray Choiniere and David Keirsey

4 Jungian Archetypes by Robin Robertson

5 Personality Plus Revised and Expanded Edition by Florence Littauer

6 Personality Plus by Florence Littauer


                       Beta Males

A beta male, as described in online men's self-improvement communities and social hierarchy theories like those from Vox Day, is often portrayed as a reliable, cooperative follower who prioritizes harmony and support over dominance, thriving in structured environments but sometimes struggling with assertiveness or attracting romantic interest due to perceived submissiveness [1][3].

Gathered Information on Personality

Drawing from these archetypes, a beta male is typically agreeable, loyal, and risk-averse, excelling in team-oriented roles where he provides stability and emotional support, but he may internalize insecurities about status, leading to passive behaviors in social or romantic dynamics [2][4].

Jungian Archetypes

The beta male primarily embodies the Everyman archetype, representing relatability, community, and dependability, with secondary alignments to the Caregiver (nurturing others) and the Innocent (avoiding conflict and seeking safety) [5].

Myers-Briggs 4-Letter Types

A beta male would most likely be an ISFJ (Introverted, Sensing, Feeling, Judging), focused on duty, loyalty, and maintaining traditions, or an ESFJ (Extraverted, Sensing, Feeling, Judging), emphasizing harmony and social support [6].

Myers-Briggs 2-Letter Types

The core 2-letter type would be SF (Sensing Feeling), prioritizing practical empathy and relational stability over abstract or dominant pursuits [1].

Enneagram Types

The beta male fits Enneagram Type 6 (The Loyalist), with a wing 5 (6w5), driven by a need for security and guidance, often displaying anxiety about independence; a possible tritype could be 6-9-2, blending loyalty with peacekeeping and helpfulness [3].

New Personality Self-Portrait Styles

Dominant styles include Devoted (loyal and committed), Sensitive (emotionally attuned and introspective), Vigilant (cautious and alert to threats), and Leisurely (easygoing and preferring routine). Socially awkward traits may be present, manifesting as hesitation in social initiation or overthinking interactions. Other styles like Conscientious, Self-Confident, Dramatic, Adventurous, Idiosyncratic, Solitary, Mercurial, Self-Sacrificing, Aggressive, and Serious could appear in varying degrees, but without emphasis on non-existent styles like charming or energetic [2][4].

Temperament Type or Blend (4-Temperament Theory or 4-Humors Theory)

The beta male embodies a Phlegmatic temperament, characterized by calmness, reliability, and aversion to conflict, often blended with Melancholic elements for introspection and perfectionism [5].

Possible Personality Disorders

Potential alignments include Avoidant Personality Disorder (fear of rejection leading to social withdrawal) or Dependent Personality Disorder (excessive reliance on others for decisions and validation), especially if insecurities amplify into chronic submissiveness [6].

Hierarchy of Basic Desires

At the top: Affiliation and Security (seeking belonging and stability); mid-level: Intimacy and Esteem (desiring approval and close bonds); lower: Power and Achievement (less pursued due to risk aversion) [1].

Hierarchy of Basic Values

Top: Loyalty and Harmony (valuing relationships and peace); mid: Responsibility and Fairness (emphasizing duty and equity); bottom: Ambition and Independence (often sidelined for group cohesion) [3].

Hierarchy of Basic Ideals (Not Desires)

Top: Cooperation and Empathy (idealizing mutual support and understanding); mid: Stability and Integrity (upholding consistency and honesty); bottom: Dominance and Innovation (viewed as disruptive to relational balance) [2].

Character Weaknesses or Flaws

Common flaws include indecisiveness, people-pleasing tendencies, resentment from unasserted needs, and difficulty standing out in competitive settings, which can lead to feelings of inadequacy or being overlooked [4].

Possible Neurotic Defense Mechanisms

Repression (suppressing assertive impulses to avoid conflict); Projection (attributing one's own insecurities to more dominant figures); Displacement (redirecting frustrations toward safer outlets like hobbies); Regression (reverting to childlike dependency in stress); Rationalization (justifying passivity as "being nice"); and Introjection (internalizing societal expectations of submissiveness) [5].

Possible Trance States

A beta male might enter a compliant or dissociative trance in group settings, where he zones out to avoid confrontation, or an anxious rumination trance, fixating on potential rejections without action [6].

Big Five Personality Dimensions

High Agreeableness (cooperative and compassionate); Moderate Extraversion (sociable but not dominant); High Conscientiousness (reliable and dutiful); Moderate Openness (practical rather than adventurous); High Neuroticism (prone to anxiety and self-doubt) [1].

Main NLP Meta-Programs (Refer to The Sourcebook of Magic)

Away From (motivated by avoiding problems); Internal (relies on self-validation but seeks external cues); Procedures (prefers structured routines); Specific (focuses on details for security); Match (seeks similarities to build harmony) [3].

Sources

1 The Sourcebook of Magic by L. Michael Hall Ph.D. and Barbara Belnap M.S.W.
2 New Personality Self-Portrait by John M. Oldham, M.D. and Lois B. Morris
3 Personality Puzzle by Florence Littauer and Marita Littauer
4 Personality Plus Revised and Expanded Edition by Florence Littauer
5 Jungian Archetypes by Robin Robertson
6 Presidential Temperament by Ray Choiniere and David Keirsey

A good relationship match for a beta male, in a heterosexual context, would typically be a confident and decisive female personality type, such as an ENTJ in Myers-Briggs (extraverted, intuitive, thinking, judging), who can provide leadership and direction while appreciating his supportive nature, creating a balanced dynamic where he feels valued for his loyalty [1][5]

In Enneagram terms, a Type 3 (The Achiever) with a wing 2 (3w2) would complement him effectively, offering ambition and social savvy that motivates him without overwhelming his need for security, fostering mutual growth and emotional intimacy [3]

For temperament, a Choleric or Choleric-Sanguine blend in a female partner would be ideal, bringing energy and initiative to counter his Phlegmatic tendencies, resulting in a partnership where she drives decisions and he provides stability [2]

In the New Personality Self-Portrait styles, a Self-Confident or Adventurous type would align positively, emphasizing assertiveness and excitement that draws out his potential while respecting his devoted and sensitive traits [4][6].


Conversely, a bad relationship match would be another highly passive or insecure female type, such as an INFP in Myers-Briggs, potentially leading to emotional stagnation, indecision, and amplified anxieties without clear leadership [1]

An Enneagram Type 9 (The Peacemaker) or Type 4 (The Individualist) could worsen dynamics, as both might prioritize avoidance of conflict or introspection over action, resulting in unresolved issues and mutual resentment [3][5].

 Temperament-wise, another Phlegmatic or Melancholic would be a poor fit, exacerbating indecisiveness and emotional withdrawal without enough drive to propel the relationship forward [2].

 In New Personality Self-Portrait terms, a Sensitive or Solitary style would create challenges, with excessive introspection or isolation leading to disconnection and unaddressed relational needs [4][6].

Sources

1 The Sourcebook of Magic by L. Michael Hall Ph.D. and Barbara Belnap M.S.W.
2 New Personality Self-Portrait by John M. Oldham, M.D. and Lois B. Morris
3 Personality Puzzle by Florence Littauer and Marita Littauer
4 Jungian Archetypes by Robin Robertson
5 Personality Plus Revised and Expanded Edition by Florence Littauer
6 Personality Plus by Florence Littauer


                       Gamma Males

A gamma male, as outlined in online men's self-improvement communities and social hierarchy theories popularized by Vox Day, is typically depicted as an intellectually arrogant but socially inept individual who harbors delusions of superiority, often resenting higher-status males while struggling with real-world dominance and romantic success, blending bitterness with unrealistic self-perception [1][3].

Gathered Information on Personality

Based on these archetypes, a gamma male is characterized by high intelligence or niche expertise paired with emotional volatility, passive-aggressiveness, and a tendency toward fantasy escapism, where he imagines himself as a "secret king" overlooked by society, leading to conflicts in social and professional settings due to misplaced entitlement and poor interpersonal skills [2][4].

Jungian Archetypes

The gamma male primarily aligns with the Shadow archetype, representing repressed resentments and unacknowledged flaws, with secondary ties to the Trickster (using cunning or sarcasm to undermine others) and the Orphan (feeling abandoned by societal hierarchies, fostering victimhood) [5][6].

Myers-Briggs 4-Letter Types

A gamma male would most likely be an INTP (Introverted, Intuitive, Thinking, Perceiving), emphasizing logical analysis and independence but with detachment from social norms, or INTJ (Introverted, Intuitive, Thinking, Judging), driven by strategic visions that often clash with reality due to overconfidence [1].

Myers-Briggs 2-Letter Types

The core 2-letter type would be NT (Intuitive Thinking), focusing on abstract ideas and intellectual dominance while neglecting emotional or practical relational dynamics [3].

Enneagram Types

The gamma male fits Enneagram Type 5 (The Investigator), with a wing 4 (5w4), motivated by a need for knowledge and uniqueness but prone to isolation and envy; a possible tritype could be 5-4-1, combining detachment with individualism and perfectionism [2][4].

New Personality Self-Portrait Styles

Dominant styles include Idiosyncratic (unconventional and original thinking), Vigilant (suspicious and alert to perceived slights), Sensitive (emotionally reactive and introspective), and Mercurial (moody and unpredictable). Socially awkward traits are prominently present, often showing as discomfort in social cues, awkward interactions, or over-intellectualizing conversations. Additional styles may include Conscientious, Self-Confident, Devoted, Dramatic, Leisurely, Adventurous, Solitary, Self-Sacrificing, Aggressive, and Serious, but without any non-existent styles like charming or energetic [5][6].

Temperament Type or Blend (4-Temperament Theory or 4-Humors Theory)

The gamma male embodies a Melancholic temperament, marked by analytical depth, moodiness, and perfectionism, often blended with Choleric elements for bursts of irritability and ambition [1].

Possible Personality Disorders

Potential alignments include Narcissistic Personality Disorder (inflated self-view masking insecurities) or Schizoid Personality Disorder (emotional detachment and preference for fantasy over real connections), with risks of Paranoid Personality Disorder if resentments escalate into distrust [3].

Hierarchy of Basic Desires

At the top: Recognition and Autonomy (craving validation for intellect without interference); mid-level: Knowledge and Esteem (pursuing expertise to boost self-worth); lower: Affiliation and Intimacy (often avoided due to fear of vulnerability) [2].

Hierarchy of Basic Values

Top: Intelligence and Individuality (valuing uniqueness and cleverness above conformity); mid: Justice and Autonomy (seeking fairness in hierarchies while resenting authority); bottom: Harmony and Empathy (dismissed as weaknesses in competitive dynamics) [4].

Hierarchy of Basic Ideals (Not Desires)

Top: Innovation and Truth (idealizing groundbreaking ideas and honesty); mid: Independence and Resilience (upholding self-reliance against perceived injustices); bottom: Cooperation and Humility (seen as concessions to inferior systems) [5].

Character Weaknesses or Flaws

Common flaws encompass delusions of grandeur, passive-aggressive behavior, social ineptitude leading to isolation, and a propensity for grudges, which can sabotage relationships and opportunities through self-sabotage or unfounded superiority complexes [6].

Possible Neurotic Defense Mechanisms

Projection (attributing personal failures to "unfair" alphas or society); Rationalization (justifying inaction as intellectual superiority); Reaction Formation (displaying false humility to mask envy); Introjection (internalizing critical self-views from past rejections); Denial (refusing to acknowledge social shortcomings); and Identification with the Aggressor (mimicking dominant figures sarcastically to cope) [1][3].

Possible Trance States

A gamma male might enter an intellectual dissociation trance, fixating on fantasies or online debates to escape reality, or a ruminative trance of resentment, cycling through grudges without resolution, potentially leading to depressive states [2].

Big Five Personality Dimensions

Moderate Extraversion (selective sociability with intellectual peers); High Openness (creative and idea-oriented); Moderate Conscientiousness (diligent in niches but inconsistent); Low Agreeableness (argumentative and resentful); High Neuroticism (prone to anxiety, envy, and mood swings) [4].

Main NLP Meta-Programs (Refer to The Sourcebook of Magic)

Away From (avoiding perceived threats to ego); Internal (relies on self-generated validation); Options (explores multiple ideas but struggles with commitment); Specific (delves into details for mastery); Mismatch (focuses on flaws in others to feel superior) [5][6].

Sources

1 The Sourcebook of Magic by L. Michael Hall Ph.D. and Barbara Belnap M.S.W.
2 Jungian Archetypes by Robin Robertson
3 Personality Puzzle by Florence Littauer and Marita Littauer
4 Personality Plus by Florence Littauer
5 Personality Plus Revised and Expanded Edition by Florence Littauer
6 The Enneagram and NLP by Anne Linden and Murray Spalding

A good relationship match for a gamma male, in a heterosexual context, would typically be an empathetic and socially adept female personality type, such as an ESFJ in Myers-Briggs (extraverted, sensing, feeling, judging), who can provide emotional warmth, practical grounding, and social facilitation to counter his introspective detachment and awkwardness, fostering a dynamic where she draws him out of isolation while he offers intellectual depth [1][5].

 In Enneagram terms, a Type 2 (The Helper) with a wing 3 (2w3) would complement him well, emphasizing nurturing support and adaptability that validates his uniqueness without triggering his resentments, potentially encouraging personal growth through gentle encouragement [3]

For temperament, a Sanguine or Sanguine-Phlegmatic blend in a female partner would be ideal, injecting optimism and relational ease to balance his Melancholic moodiness, creating a partnership that mitigates his social struggles with her outgoing nature [2][6]

In the New Personality Self-Portrait styles, a Devoted or Dramatic type would align positively, offering loyalty and expressive energy that softens his vigilant and idiosyncratic tendencies, helping to build intimacy without overwhelming his need for autonomy [4].


Conversely, a bad relationship match would be another intellectually intense but emotionally distant female type, such as an INTJ in Myers-Briggs, which could lead to mutual isolation, intellectual clashes, and amplified resentments without sufficient emotional connection to resolve conflicts [1][5]

An Enneagram Type 5 (like himself) or Type 8 (The Challenger) might exacerbate issues, resulting in power struggles or complete withdrawal, as both could prioritize detachment or control over vulnerability, fostering a toxic cycle of misunderstanding and bitterness [3].

 Temperament-wise, another Melancholic or Melancholic-Choleric would be a poor fit, intensifying mood swings, perfectionism, and passive-aggression without enough levity to break negative patterns [2]

In New Personality Self-Portrait terms, a Solitary or Aggressive style would create significant tension, with potential for escalating arguments or emotional shutdowns that highlight his socially awkward flaws and her incompatible independence [4][6].

Sources

1 The Sourcebook of Magic by L. Michael Hall Ph.D. and Barbara Belnap M.S.W.
2 New Personality Self-Portrait by John M. Oldham, M.D. and Lois B. Morris
3 Personality Plus by Florence Littauer
4 Personality Plus Revised and Expanded Edition by Florence Littauer
5 Jungian Archetypes by Robin Robertson
6 Personality Puzzle by Florence Littauer and Marita Littauer

                           Delta Males

A delta male, as described in online men's self-improvement communities and social hierarchy theories popularized by Vox Day, is often seen as the "everyman" archetype, embodying the average, hardworking individual who values stability, routine, and societal contribution without aspiring to leadership or spotlight, serving as the reliable backbone of communities but sometimes feeling undervalued in more dynamic hierarchies [1][3].

Gathered Information on Personality

From gathered insights, a delta male is practical, dependable, and grounded, prioritizing duty, family, and consistent effort in everyday roles like steady jobs or community involvement, with strengths in reliability and practicality but potential weaknesses in lacking ambition or feeling stuck in mundane routines, as exemplified by the steady office worker or family man who focuses on long-term stability over personal glory [2][4][6].

Jungian Archetypes

The delta male primarily embodies the Everyman archetype, representing the common, relatable individual who fosters community and normalcy, with secondary alignments to the Caregiver (providing steady support) and the Innocent (seeking simple, harmonious life without grand conflicts) [5].

Myers-Briggs 4-Letter Types

A delta male would most likely be an ISTJ (Introverted, Sensing, Thinking, Judging), emphasizing duty, structure, and reliability in practical matters, or an ISFJ (Introverted, Sensing, Feeling, Judging), focused on loyalty and maintaining traditions for the sake of others [1][3].

Myers-Briggs 2-Letter Types

The core 2-letter type would be SJ (Sensing Judging), prioritizing organization, responsibility, and adherence to established norms for security and efficiency [2].

Enneagram Types

The delta male fits Enneagram Type 6 (The Loyalist), with a wing 7 (6w7), driven by a need for security and community, often displaying dependability but with underlying anxiety about change; a possible tritype could be 6-9-3, blending loyalty with adaptability and a focus on achievement through routine [4][6].

New Personality Self-Portrait Styles

Dominant styles include Conscientious (diligent and rule-following), Devoted (committed to relationships and duties), Leisurely (preferring a relaxed, predictable pace), and Serious (practical and no-nonsense). Socially awkward traits may be minimally present, such as mild discomfort in highly unpredictable social settings, but are not dominant. Additional styles could encompass Self-Confident, Dramatic, Vigilant, Sensitive, Adventurous, Idiosyncratic, Solitary, Mercurial, Self-Sacrificing, and Aggressive in lesser degrees, without reference to non-existent styles like charming or energetic [5].

Temperament Type or Blend (4-Temperament Theory or 4-Humors Theory)

The delta male embodies a Phlegmatic temperament, characterized by calmness, reliability, and a preference for harmony and routine, often blended with Melancholic elements for thoughtful diligence and attention to detail [1][3].

Possible Personality Disorders

While generally well-adjusted, a delta male could potentially align with Dependent Personality Disorder (over-reliance on structure and others for direction) or Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder (rigid adherence to routines leading to inflexibility), particularly if feelings of being overlooked escalate into chronic dissatisfaction [2][4].

Hierarchy of Basic Desires

At the top: Security and Affiliation (seeking stable relationships and community belonging); mid-level: Esteem and Achievement (through consistent, practical contributions); lower: Power and Excitement (less emphasized, as risk-taking is avoided in favor of dependability) [6].

Hierarchy of Basic Values

Top: Responsibility and Loyalty (valuing duty and steadfastness in roles); mid: Stability and Fairness (emphasizing routine and equitable contributions); bottom: Ambition and Innovation (often viewed as unnecessary disruptions to a grounded life) [5].

Hierarchy of Basic Ideals (Not Desires)

Top: Integrity and Community (idealizing honesty and collective well-being); mid: Perseverance and Practicality (upholding endurance in everyday tasks); bottom: Dominance and Individualism (seen as contrary to the cooperative, everyman ethos) [1][3].

Character Weaknesses or Flaws

Common flaws include complacency, resistance to change, feelings of resentment from being overlooked, and a lack of initiative, which can lead to stagnation in personal or professional growth and unfulfilled potential [2][4].

Possible Neurotic Defense Mechanisms

Repression (suppressing ambitions to maintain routine); Rationalization (justifying lack of advancement as contentment with stability); Displacement (channeling frustrations into minor complaints rather than action); Regression (retreating to familiar comforts during stress); and Introjection (internalizing societal roles as personal identity to avoid self-doubt) [6].

Possible Trance States

A delta male might enter a habitual routine trance, where repetitive daily activities provide comfort but limit growth, or a passive contentment trance, zoning out in familiar settings to avoid confronting feelings of mundanity [5].

Big Five Personality Dimensions

High Conscientiousness (diligent and organized); Moderate Extraversion (sociable in familiar groups but not outgoing); Moderate Openness (practical rather than innovative); High Agreeableness (cooperative and harmonious); Low Neuroticism (generally stable but prone to quiet dissatisfaction) [1][3].

Main NLP Meta-Programs (Refer to The Sourcebook of Magic)

Procedures (prefers step-by-step routines); Away From (motivated by avoiding instability); Internal (relies on personal standards for validation); Specific (focuses on concrete details); Match (seeks similarities and harmony in relationships) [2][4].

Sources

1 The Sourcebook of Magic by L. Michael Hall Ph.D. and Barbara Belnap M.S.W.
2 New Personality Self-Portrait by John M. Oldham, M.D. and Lois B. Morris
3 Trances People Live by Stephen Wolinsky, Ph.D.
4 Presidential Temperament by Ray Choiniere and David Keirsey
5 Jungian Archetypes by Robin Robertson
6 Personality Plus Revised and Expanded Edition by Florence Littauer

A good relationship match for a delta male, in a heterosexual context, would typically be a lively and adaptable female personality type, such as an ENFP in Myers-Briggs (extraverted, intuitive, feeling, perceiving), who brings creativity and enthusiasm to invigorate his routine-oriented life while appreciating his dependability and stability, creating a balanced dynamic where she encourages growth without disrupting his need for structure [1][5]

In Enneagram terms, a Type 7 (The Enthusiast) with a wing 6 (7w6) would complement him effectively, offering optimism and adventure that counters his potential complacency, fostering mutual support through her social energy and his grounded reliability [3][6].

 For temperament, a Sanguine or Sanguine-Choleric blend in a female partner would be ideal, injecting fun and initiative to enliven his Phlegmatic steadiness, resulting in a partnership that blends excitement with his preference for harmony and routine [2]

In the New Personality Self-Portrait styles, an Adventurous or Dramatic type would align positively, providing expressive vitality and risk-taking that draws him out of mundanity while harmonizing with his conscientious and devoted traits [4].


Conversely, a bad relationship match would be another highly structured or passive female type, such as an ISTJ in Myers-Briggs, potentially leading to emotional stagnation, excessive rigidity, and a lack of novelty that amplifies his feelings of being stuck in routine without any spark [1][5].

 An Enneagram Type 1 (The Reformer) or Type 6 (like himself) could worsen dynamics, as both might emphasize perfectionism or caution over spontaneity, resulting in unresolved resentments and a monotonous relationship lacking passion [3].

 Temperament-wise, another Phlegmatic or Melancholic would be a poor fit, exacerbating indecisiveness, emotional withdrawal, and resistance to change without enough drive to evolve the partnership [2][6]

In New Personality Self-Portrait terms, a Serious or Solitary style would create challenges, with potential for mutual isolation or overemphasis on duty leading to disconnection and unfulfilled emotional needs [4].

Sources

1 The Sourcebook of Magic by L. Michael Hall Ph.D. and Barbara Belnap M.S.W.
2 New Personality Self-Portrait by John M. Oldham, M.D. and Lois B. Morris
3 Personality Plus Revised and Expanded Edition by Florence Littauer
4 Jungian Archetypes by Robin Robertson
5 Presidential Temperament by Ray Choiniere and David Keirsey
6 Personality Plus by Florence Littauer

                       Sigma Males            

A sigma male, as conceptualized in online men's self-improvement communities and social hierarchy theories popularized by Vox Day, is typically portrayed as an independent, self-reliant individual who operates outside traditional social hierarchies, possessing alpha-like confidence and competence but rejecting dominance games in favor of personal freedom, solitude, and adaptability, often thriving as a lone entrepreneur or wanderer while potentially appearing mysterious or aloof [1][3].

Gathered Information on Personality

Drawing from these archetypes, a sigma male is highly adaptable and self-sufficient, prioritizing autonomy and introspection over group dynamics, with strengths in resilience and innovation but weaknesses in forming deep connections or collaborating, leading to potential isolation as he navigates life on his own terms without seeking validation from societal structures [2][4][6].

Jungian Archetypes

The sigma male primarily embodies the Outlaw or Rebel archetype, challenging conventional hierarchies through independence, with secondary alignments to the Explorer (seeking personal freedom and discovery) and the Sage (relying on inner wisdom and self-reliance) [5].

Myers-Briggs 4-Letter Types

A sigma male would most likely be an INTJ (Introverted, Intuitive, Thinking, Judging), focused on strategic planning and independence, or an ISTP (Introverted, Sensing, Thinking, Perceiving), emphasizing practical problem-solving and adaptability in solitary pursuits [1][3].

Myers-Briggs 2-Letter Types

The core 2-letter type would be NT (Intuitive Thinking) or ST (Sensing Thinking), prioritizing logical autonomy and efficiency over social or emotional dependencies [2].

Enneagram Types

The sigma male fits Enneagram Type 5 (The Investigator), with a wing 6 (5w6), driven by a need for competence and security through knowledge, often displaying detachment; a possible tritype could be 5-8-3, blending introspection with assertiveness and achievement-oriented independence [4][6].

New Personality Self-Portrait Styles

Dominant styles include Solitary (preferring independence and introspection), Idiosyncratic (unconventional and original), Adventurous (risk-taking in personal ventures), and Vigilant (cautious and self-protective). Socially awkward traits may be present, such as discomfort in forced social settings or a mysterious aloofness that hinders teamwork. Additional styles could include Conscientious, Self-Confident, Devoted, Dramatic, Leisurely, Sensitive, Mercurial, Self-Sacrificing, Aggressive, and Serious in varying degrees, without reference to non-existent styles like charming or energetic [5].

Temperament Type or Blend (4-Temperament Theory or 4-Humors Theory)

The sigma male embodies a Melancholic temperament, marked by analytical depth and self-reliance, often blended with Choleric elements for decisive independence and adaptability [1][3].

Possible Personality Disorders

Potential alignments include Schizoid Personality Disorder (emotional detachment and preference for solitude) or Avoidant Personality Disorder (withdrawal from social interactions due to fear of vulnerability), especially if independence escalates into chronic isolation [2][4].

Hierarchy of Basic Desires

At the top: Autonomy and Competence (seeking freedom and self-mastery); mid-level: Exploration and Achievement (pursuing personal goals outside hierarchies); lower: Affiliation and Security (less prioritized, as group ties are often viewed as restrictive) [6].

Hierarchy of Basic Values

Top: Independence and Self-Reliance (valuing personal freedom above conformity); mid: Adaptability and Integrity (emphasizing flexibility and inner truth); bottom: Social Status and Harmony (dismissed in favor of solitary pursuits) [5].

Hierarchy of Basic Ideals (Not Desires)

Top: Freedom and Innovation (idealizing unbound exploration and originality); mid: Resilience and Wisdom (upholding inner strength and knowledge); bottom: Conformity and Collectivism (seen as limiting to individual potential) [1][3].

Character Weaknesses or Flaws

Common flaws include aloofness leading to relational difficulties, reluctance to commit to teams or long-term bonds, potential arrogance from self-perceived superiority, and self-imposed isolation that hinders emotional fulfillment or collaborative success [2][4].

Possible Neurotic Defense Mechanisms

Denial (ignoring the need for social connections); Repression (suppressing vulnerabilities to maintain independence); Projection (attributing relational failures to others' flaws); Sublimation (channeling energies into solitary achievements); Rationalization (justifying aloofness as superior self-sufficiency); and Identification with the Aggressor (emulating dominant figures while rejecting their hierarchies) [6].

Possible Trance States

A sigma male might enter a focused introspection trance during solitary problem-solving, providing clarity but risking detachment from reality, or an adaptive flow trance in dynamic environments, enhancing resilience but potentially leading to emotional numbness [5].

Big Five Personality Dimensions

Low Extraversion (introverted and selective in interactions); High Openness (innovative and exploratory); High Conscientiousness (self-disciplined in personal goals); Moderate Agreeableness (cooperative when necessary but independent); Low Neuroticism (emotionally stable and resilient) [1][3].

Main NLP Meta-Programs (Refer to The Sourcebook of Magic)

Away From (motivated by avoiding constraints); Internal (relies on self-validation); Options (prefers multiple paths for freedom); General (focuses on big-picture strategies); Mismatch (identifies differences to maintain uniqueness) [2][4].

Sources

1 The Sourcebook of Magic by L. Michael Hall Ph.D. and Barbara Belnap M.S.W.
2 New Personality Self-Portrait by John M. Oldham, M.D. and Lois B. Morris
3 Presidential Temperament by Ray Choiniere and David Keirsey
4 Jungian Archetypes by Robin Robertson
5 The Enneagram and NLP by Anne Linden and Murray Spalding
6 Personality Plus Revised and Expanded Edition by Florence Littauer

A good relationship match for a sigma male, in a heterosexual context, would typically be a flexible and empathetic female personality type, such as an ENFJ in Myers-Briggs (extraverted, intuitive, feeling, judging), who can provide emotional warmth and social connectivity to balance his solitary independence without demanding conformity to hierarchies, allowing for a dynamic where she fosters deeper intimacy while respecting his need for autonomy [1][5]

In Enneagram terms, a Type 9 (The Peacemaker) with a wing 1 (9w1) would complement him well, offering harmonious support and adaptability that aligns with his self-reliance, potentially creating a low-conflict partnership that encourages mutual growth through her calming presence and his innovative insights [3][6]

For temperament, a Phlegmatic or Phlegmatic-Sanguine blend in a female partner would be ideal, bringing relational ease and optimism to soften his Melancholic introspection, resulting in a bond that values quiet companionship over intense social demands [2]

In the New Personality Self-Portrait styles, a Devoted or Sensitive type would align positively, emphasizing loyalty and emotional attunement that draws him into connection without infringing on his solitary or idiosyncratic nature [4].

Conversely, a bad relationship match would be another highly independent or detached female type, such as an ISTP in Myers-Briggs, which could lead to emotional distance, mutual aloofness, and a lack of vulnerability that exacerbates his isolation tendencies without providing the relational glue needed for sustainability [1][5]

An Enneagram Type 5 (like himself) or Type 4 (The Individualist) might worsen dynamics, fostering intellectual standoffs or intensified withdrawal, as both could prioritize personal space over compromise, leading to unresolved conflicts and emotional voids [3]

Temperament-wise, another Melancholic or Melancholic-Choleric would be a poor fit, amplifying introspection and potential aloofness into a cycle of disconnection without sufficient warmth to bridge the gaps [2][6]

In New Personality Self-Portrait terms, a Solitary or Vigilant style would create significant challenges, with risks of suspicion, minimal emotional sharing, and amplified socially awkward interactions that hinder intimacy and mutual understanding [4].

Sources

1 The Sourcebook of Magic by L. Michael Hall Ph.D. and Barbara Belnap M.S.W.
2 New Personality Self-Portrait by John M. Oldham, M.D. and Lois B. Morris
3 Presidential Temperament by Ray Choiniere and David Keirsey
4 Jungian Archetypes by Robin Robertson
5 Personality Plus Revised and Expanded Edition by Florence Littauer
6 The Enneagram and NLP by Anne Linden and Murray Spalding

                      Omega Males                                                                               

An omega male, as depicted in online men's self-improvement communities and social hierarchy theories popularized by Vox Day, is generally characterized as a socially withdrawn, low-status individual who exists at the bottom of perceived hierarchies, often eccentric and rejecting societal norms either by choice or circumstance, embodying the archetype of the reclusive outcast or artist who prioritizes personal uniqueness over social integration [1][3].

Gathered Information on Personality

From gathered insights, an omega male is typically isolated and unconventional, with strengths in creativity and freedom from expectations but weaknesses in low confidence, social rejection, and relational struggles, as seen in examples like the reclusive artist who thrives in solitude but faces challenges in forming connections or achieving conventional success [2][4][6].

Jungian Archetypes

The omega male primarily aligns with the Orphan archetype, symbolizing feelings of abandonment and outsider status, with secondary connections to the Creator (channeling eccentricity into unique expressions) and the Fool (embracing non-conformity in unpredictable ways) [5].

Myers-Briggs 4-Letter Types

An omega male would most likely be an INFP (Introverted, Intuitive, Feeling, Perceiving), driven by inner values and creativity but detached from social structures, or an INTP (Introverted, Intuitive, Thinking, Perceiving), focusing on abstract ideas with emotional withdrawal [1][3].

Myers-Briggs 2-Letter Types

The core 2-letter type would be NF (Intuitive Feeling) or NT (Intuitive Thinking), emphasizing idealism or logic in isolation from external validation [2].

Enneagram Types

The omega male fits Enneagram Type 4 (The Individualist), with a wing 5 (4w5), motivated by a need for identity and significance but prone to melancholy and envy; a possible tritype could be 4-5-9, combining uniqueness with detachment and peacekeeping avoidance [4][6].

New Personality Self-Portrait Styles

Dominant styles include Idiosyncratic (eccentric and original), Solitary (withdrawn and independent), Sensitive (emotionally deep but vulnerable), and Mercurial (moody and unpredictable). Socially awkward traits are prominently present, often manifesting as profound discomfort in social settings, avoidance of norms, or eccentric behaviors that lead to rejection. Additional styles may encompass Conscientious, Self-Confident, Devoted, Dramatic, Vigilant, Leisurely, Adventurous, Self-Sacrificing, Aggressive, and Serious in lesser degrees, without reference to non-existent styles like charming or energetic [5].

Temperament Type or Blend (4-Temperament Theory or 4-Humors Theory)

The omega male embodies a Melancholic temperament, characterized by introspection, creativity, and moodiness, often blended with Phlegmatic elements for passive withdrawal and aversion to conflict [1][3].

Possible Personality Disorders

Potential alignments include Schizotypal Personality Disorder (eccentric thinking and social discomfort) or Avoidant Personality Disorder (intense fear of rejection leading to isolation), with risks of Depressive Personality traits if low status fosters chronic hopelessness [2][4].

Hierarchy of Basic Desires

At the top: Identity and Autonomy (seeking personal uniqueness and freedom from norms); mid-level: Creativity and Intimacy (pursuing self-expression and selective deep connections); lower: Status and Affiliation (often rejected or unattainable due to withdrawal) [6].

Hierarchy of Basic Values

Top: Individuality and Authenticity (valuing personal truth over conformity); mid: Creativity and Resilience (emphasizing artistic expression and inner strength); bottom: Social Harmony and Achievement (dismissed as superficial in hierarchical systems) [5].

Hierarchy of Basic Ideals (Not Desires)

Top: Uniqueness and Freedom (idealizing non-conformity and self-discovery); mid: Empathy and Innovation (upholding compassionate originality); bottom: Dominance and Collectivism (viewed as oppressive to the outsider ethos) [1][3].

Character Weaknesses or Flaws

Common flaws include chronic isolation, low self-esteem leading to self-sabotage, eccentric behaviors that alienate others, and a tendency toward victimhood or resentment, which can perpetuate cycles of rejection and unfulfilled potential [2][4].

Possible Neurotic Defense Mechanisms

Denial (refusing to acknowledge social failures); Repression (burying desires for connection); Projection (blaming society for personal eccentricities); Regression (retreating into childlike fantasies); Sublimation (channeling frustrations into creative outlets); Rationalization (justifying isolation as superior independence); Reaction Formation (displaying indifference to mask longing for acceptance); and Introjection (internalizing negative self-views from rejections) [6].

Possible Trance States

An omega male might enter a dissociative creative trance, immersing in artistic or fantastical worlds to escape reality, or a depressive withdrawal trance, fixating on feelings of rejection without seeking change, potentially leading to prolonged inertia [5].

Big Five Personality Dimensions

Low Extraversion (highly introverted and withdrawn); High Openness (creative and unconventional); Low Conscientiousness (inconsistent in structured tasks); Low Agreeableness (non-conformist and potentially abrasive); High Neuroticism (prone to anxiety, mood swings, and self-doubt) [1][3].

Main NLP Meta-Programs (Refer to The Sourcebook of Magic)

Away From (motivated by escaping social pressures); Internal (relies on self-generated meaning); Options (explores unconventional paths); Specific (delves into niche interests); Mismatch (highlights differences to affirm uniqueness) [2][4].

Sources

1 The Sourcebook of Magic by L. Michael Hall Ph.D. and Barbara Belnap M.S.W.
2 New Personality Self-Portrait by John M. Oldham, M.D. and Lois B. Morris
3 Presidential Temperament by Ray Choiniere and David Keirsey
4 Jungian Archetypes by Robin Robertson
5 Trances People Live by Stephen Wolinsky, Ph.D.
6 Personality Puzzle by Florence Littauer and Marita Littauer


A good relationship match for an omega male, in a heterosexual context, would typically be a socially engaging and nurturing female personality type, such as an ESFJ in Myers-Briggs (extraverted, sensing, feeling, judging), who can offer emotional stability and relational initiative to draw him out of isolation while appreciating his creative eccentricity, creating a supportive dynamic that mitigates his withdrawal tendencies [1][5]

In Enneagram terms, a Type 2 (The Helper) with a wing 1 (2w1) would complement him effectively, providing compassionate care and adaptability that fosters intimacy without overwhelming his need for personal space, potentially encouraging his artistic strengths through her affirming presence [3][6]

For temperament, a Sanguine or Sanguine-Phlegmatic blend in a female partner would be ideal, bringing optimism and social ease to counter his Melancholic introspection, resulting in a partnership that blends her outgoing warmth with his unique perspectives for mutual enrichment [2].

 In the New Personality Self-Portrait styles, a Devoted or Dramatic type would align positively, emphasizing loyalty and expressive energy that helps bridge his socially awkward gaps and solitary nature, promoting a more connected and fulfilling bond [4].


Conversely, a bad relationship match would be another introspective or eccentric female type, such as an INFP in Myers-Briggs, which could amplify mutual withdrawal, emotional volatility, and social disconnection, leading to a cycle of isolation without sufficient external motivation to engage [1][5]

An Enneagram Type 4 (like himself) or Type 5 (The Investigator) might exacerbate issues, resulting in intensified moodiness, envy, or detachment that hinders vulnerability and escalates resentments into relational breakdowns [3]

Temperament-wise, another Melancholic or Melancholic-Phlegmatic would be a poor fit, fostering excessive rumination and passivity without the energy needed to overcome shared tendencies toward isolation and low confidence [2][6]

In New Personality Self-Portrait terms, a Solitary or Idiosyncratic style would create significant challenges, with potential for mutual eccentricity devolving into misunderstanding, amplified awkwardness, and emotional distance that leaves both partners unfulfilled [4].


Sources

1 The Sourcebook of Magic by L. Michael Hall Ph.D. and Barbara Belnap M.S.W.
2 New Personality Self-Portrait by John M. Oldham, M.D. and Lois B. Morris
3 Presidential Temperament by Ray Choiniere and David Keirsey
4 Jungian Archetypes by Robin Robertson
5 Personality Puzzle by Florence Littauer and Marita Littauer
6 Personality Plus Revised and Expanded Edition by Florence Littauer

In addition:

                              Female Types

While the original theory of the 6 male types (alpha, beta, gamma, delta, sigma, and omega) primarily focuses on male archetypes in online men's self-improvement communities and social hierarchy discussions, it doesn't explicitly define parallel female types, as these categories are not scientifically validated and often stem from evolutionary psychology interpretations without empirical backing [1][3]

However, based on extensions in similar online discussions and interpersonal dynamics theories, it's plausible to conceptualize 6 analogous female types that could serve as complementary counterparts, where each female type aligns as a "good relationship match" for one of the male types in a heterosexual context, emphasizing balance in dominance, support, and emotional needs to foster harmony and mutual growth [2][4]

These female archetypes would be speculative adaptations, drawing from the same non-validated frameworks, and could be named similarly (e.g., alpha female, beta female, etc.) to mirror the male hierarchy, with traits that counterbalance or enhance the male's strengths while mitigating weaknesses [5][6].

For instance, an "alpha female" could be characterized as a confident, ambitious leader (similar to ENTJ in Myers-Briggs or Enneagram Type 8), making her a strong match for a beta male by providing the decisiveness and direction he lacks, creating a dynamic where she drives ambition and he offers loyal support without power struggles [2][3]

A "beta female" might embody nurturing reliability (like ISFJ or Enneagram Type 2), pairing well with an alpha male by offering emotional stability and admiration that bolsters his dominance, allowing him to lead while she maintains harmony in a Choleric-Phlegmatic blend [1][5]

Extending this, a "gamma female" could be intellectually sharp but socially adaptable (e.g., ESFJ or Type 2 with Sanguine traits), complementing a gamma male's eccentricity by facilitating social connections and emotional grounding, reducing his resentments through her empathetic facilitation [4][6]

A "delta female" might represent lively adaptability (such as ENFP or Type 7 with Sanguine energy), matching a delta male by injecting excitement into his routines, encouraging growth in a partnership that values his dependability alongside her spontaneity [2]

For a sigma male, a "sigma female" could be independently harmonious (like ENFJ or Type 9 with Phlegmatic flexibility), respecting his solitude while providing subtle emotional ties that prevent total isolation without infringing on his autonomy [3][5]

Finally, an "omega female" might be creatively nurturing (e.g., ESFJ or Type 2 with Sanguine warmth), serving as an ideal match for an omega male by drawing him out of withdrawal with patient support, appreciating his uniqueness while countering his social awkwardness through her relational skills [1][4][6].


That said, not all potential female types in these archetypal frameworks would be good matches for any of the 6 male types; some could be universally poor fits due to clashing dynamics, such as excessive rivalry, emotional mismatch, or amplified flaws like isolation or volatility, leading to conflicts rather than complementarity in heterosexual pairings [2][3]

For example, a highly dominant and confrontational female type (e.g., another ENTJ or Enneagram Type 8 with pure Choleric temperament) might not suit any male type well, as it could provoke power struggles with alphas, overwhelm betas, intensify resentments in gammas, stifle deltas' routines, clash with sigmas' independence, and exacerbate omegas' withdrawal through intimidation [1][5].

 Similarly, an overly passive and introspective female archetype (like INFP or Enneagram Type 4 with Melancholic traits) could be a bad match across the board, fostering stagnation with betas and deltas, emotional voids with sigmas and omegas, intellectual standoffs with gammas, and frustration for alphas who need more active support [4][6]

Other mismatched types might include a rigidly structured perfectionist (e.g., ISTJ or Type 1 with Melancholic-Phlegmatic blend), which could lead to inflexibility and resentment in all pairings by enforcing norms that alphas defy, betas over-rely on, gammas rebel against, deltas get stuck in, sigmas ignore, and omegas escape from [2].

 Additionally, an erratic and self-focused female type (such as ESTP or Type 7 with unblended Sanguine energy) might universally fail, causing instability through impulsivity that disrupts alphas' leadership, betas' security, gammas' intellect, deltas' routines, sigmas' solitude, and omegas' creativity without providing grounding [3][5].

Sources

1 The Sourcebook of Magic by L. Michael Hall Ph.D. and Barbara Belnap M.S.W.
2 New Personality Self-Portrait by John M. Oldham, M.D. and Lois B. Morris
3 Jungian Archetypes by Robin Robertson
4 Personality Plus by Florence Littauer
5 Personality Plus Revised and Expanded Edition by Florence Littauer
6 Presidential Temperament by Ray Choiniere and David Keirsey

Friday, August 29, 2025

Parents should control what children learn in school

 In the ongoing debate about education, conservatism firmly holds that parents, not schools or government entities, should have primary control over what children learn, as this aligns with principles of individual liberty, family sovereignty, and limited government intervention [1][3][5]. 

This perspective emphasizes that parents are the natural guardians of their children's moral, intellectual, and spiritual development, and schools should serve as extensions of parental choices rather than overriding them with state-mandated curricula that may promote progressive ideologies [2][4].

 For instance, conservatives often argue against school policies that introduce controversial topics like gender theory or critical race theory without parental consent, viewing such actions as an overreach that undermines family values and religious freedoms [6][7]. 

Historical and philosophical conservative thought, rooted in ideas of personal responsibility and local control, supports empowering parents through mechanisms like school choice vouchers or homeschooling options, ensuring that education reflects community standards rather than bureaucratic dictates [8][9]. 

Ultimately, when schools usurp parental authority, it erodes the foundational role of the family in society, which conservatism seeks to protect as essential for a stable, virtuous citizenry.

Sources

1 Vindicating the Founders: Race, Sex, Class, and Justice in the Origins of America by Thomas G. West

2 The Political Theory of the American Founding: Natural Rights, Public Policy, and the Moral Conditions of Freedom by Thomas G. West

3 Hamilton's Curse by Thomas J. Dilorenzo

4 Broke by Glen Beck

5 Liberty and Tyranny by Mark Levin

6 The Philosophy of the American Revolution by Morton White

7 Arguing With Idiots by Glen Beck

8 How the Left Was Won by Richard Mgrdechian

9 The Federalist Papers In Modern Language edited by Mary E. Webster


In addition:

Building on the conservative principle that parents hold primary authority over their children's education, it's essential to recognize that this control extends to curriculum choices, ensuring that schooling aligns with family values rather than imposing external ideologies [1][2]. 

Historical conservative thought emphasizes limited government in education, arguing that schools should facilitate parental oversight rather than act as independent entities dictating moral or social teachings [3]. 

For example, when schools introduce topics without parental input, it risks eroding traditional family structures, which conservatives view as the bedrock of societal stability [4]. 

Empowering parents through tools like school vouchers or opt-out policies for controversial subjects preserves individual liberties and prevents bureaucratic overreach [5]. 

Ultimately, this approach fosters a virtuous citizenry by prioritizing local and familial control over centralized mandates [6].

Sources

1 The Political Theory of the American Founding: Natural Rights, Public Policy, and the Moral Conditions of Freedom by Thomas G. West
2 Vindicating the Founders: Race, Sex, Class, and Justice in the Origins of America by Thomas G. West
3 Hamilton's Curse by Thomas J. Dilorenzo
4 Glen Beck's Common Sense by Glen Beck
5 Arguing With Idiots by Glen Beck
6 Philosophy, The Federalist, and the Constitution by Morton White

How to "act white"

 I will rely on general cultural perceptions and stereotypes often associated with "acting white" in a professional US context, while applying Neuro-linguistic programming, NLP strategies to build a model. My aim is to guide you through this exploration in a way that fosters understanding, behavioral flexibility, and personal empowerment.


In the context of a small business in the US, "acting white" might be perceived through certain behaviors, communication styles, and cultural norms often associated with mainstream white American professional culture. These perceptions can vary widely depending on regional, social, and individual perspectives, but I'll outline some commonly recognized traits and how they might manifest in a workplace setting. Using NLP techniques, we’ll frame this as an opportunity to adopt behaviors that align with professional success and effective communication in this environment, while maintaining authenticity.


What "Acting White" Might Look Like as an Employee in a Small Business in the US

Professional Appearance and Demeanor:

 In many US small business environments, "acting white" might be associated with adhering to a polished, mainstream professional appearance. This could include wearing business casual attire (e.g., collared shirts, slacks, or blazers) that aligns with typical corporate or suburban norms, maintaining neat grooming, and displaying body language that conveys confidence and formality, such as direct eye contact and a firm handshake. In NLP terms, this is about modeling observable behaviors of successful professionals in similar environments. Individuals can visualize themselves embodying this demeanor using timeline therapy, imagining a future where one confidently presents oneself in this way.


Work Ethic and Behavioral Norms: 

Perceptions of "acting white" in a workplace might include a strong emphasis on punctuality, individual accountability, and a structured approach to tasks—traits often stereotypically tied to mainstream white professional culture. This could look like arriving on time, meeting deadlines consistently, and focusing on individual contributions rather than collective or communal approaches. Using NLP’s reframing technique, you can shift any internal resistance by asking, “How does adopting this structure empower me to succeed in this role?” This helps align your mindset with the desired behavior.


Interpersonal Interactions: 

In a small business setting, "acting white" might be perceived as maintaining a reserved or formal tone in interactions, avoiding overly emotional expressions, and prioritizing direct, task-oriented communication over personal or relational dialogue. This could include keeping personal opinions or cultural expressions subdued to fit into a perceived "neutral" or mainstream workplace culture. In NLP, we can use the Meta-Model to clarify assumptions by asking, “What specific interactions feel most effective in this environment?” This helps identify precise behaviors to adopt.


What "Acting White" Might Sound Like as an Employee in a Small Business in the US

Speech Patterns and Language: Linguistically, "acting white" might be associated with using Standard American English, minimizing slang or regional dialects, and adopting a clear, articulate speaking style often linked to mainstream white culture in professional settings. This could sound like using formal greetings (“Good morning, how can I assist?”), avoiding colloquialisms, and speaking at a moderate pace with a neutral tone. In NLP modeling, you can practice this by observing exemplars—perhaps colleagues or media figures—who embody this style, and replicate their tone and vocabulary in a way that feels congruent with your identity.


Communication Style:

 The communication style might involve focusing on logic and efficiency over emotional or storytelling approaches, often perceived as a "white" professional trait in some contexts. This could sound like concise responses, such as “I’ve completed the report and identified three key areas for improvement,” rather than a more narrative or expressive style. Using NLP’s anchoring technique, you can link a confident state to a physical gesture (like touching your thumb and forefinger) and trigger it while practicing this communication style to feel more at ease.


Conflict Resolution and Feedback: 

In terms of handling conflict or providing feedback, "acting white" might sound like using indirect or polite phrasing to address issues, such as “I think we might consider a different approach for next time,” rather than a more direct or confrontational style. This aligns with a stereotype of emotional restraint often associated with white professional culture. NLP’s Milton Model can help here by using suggestive language patterns to soften communication and bypass resistance, both in yourself and others, fostering smoother interactions.


Applying NLP to Adopt These Behaviors Authentically

In NLP, the goal isn’t to lose your identity but to expand your behavioral flexibility so you can adapt to different contexts while achieving your desired outcomes. Let’s apply some specific NLP patterns to integrate these behaviors in a small business setting:


Patterns for Building Empowering Self-Images:

 Visualize yourself as a successful employee who embodies these traits while remaining true to your core identity. Ask, “How can I adopt these behaviors in a way that feels authentic and enhances my professional growth?” This builds a positive self-image aligned with your goals.

Strategies for Empowering Action Plans: 

Break down the behaviors into small, actionable steps. For example, practice Standard English in specific workplace scenarios, or set a goal to arrive five minutes early each day. Track your progress and adjust as needed.

Core Transformation Pattern: If adopting these traits feels in conflict with your identity, explore the deeper intention behind wanting to “act white” in this context. Perhaps it’s about achieving respect, success, or connection. Connect this change to a core value, ensuring it feels meaningful and empowering.

It’s important to note that cultural perceptions like “acting white” are subjective and can carry different meanings based on individual and community perspectives.  This response is based on general cultural stereotypes and NLP strategies for modeling behavior. 

Sources

1 Core Transformation by Connirae Andreas and Tamara Andreas

2 The Sourcebook of Magic by L. Michael Hall Ph.D. and Barbara Belnap M.S.W.

3 Time Line Therapy by Tad James and Wyatt Woodsmall

4 Precision by Michael McMaster and John Grinder

5 Introducing Neuro-linguistic Programming by Joseph O'Connor and John Seymour

6 Solutions by Leslie Cameron-Bandler

Why do Democrats hate prayer?

 Democrats' apparent hatred of prayer stems from deep-seated psychological flaws rooted in leftist ideology, where they worship big government, and where prayer represents personal responsibility, moral accountability, and a connection to transcendent values that challenge their worship of big government and statist worldview, leading them to view it as a threat to their agenda of government dependency and secular control [1][3]. 

This aversion is not merely a policy preference, but a manifestation of abnormal psychology, including delusions of grandeur, where liberals believe the state can replace divine order, fostering a denial of reality that ignores the historical role of faith in building resilient societies [2][4]. 

Emotionally, Democrats are chained by envy and resentment toward those who find strength in prayer, as it highlights their own inner chaos and inability to cope without coercive systems, often projecting their self-pity onto society as a whole [5][7]. 

Yes, there is a profound hatred of the good for being good—beyond envy, this includes a destructive nihilism where prayer's promotion of virtue and self-reliance is seen as "oppressive," driving a desire to dismantle it through legal bans or cultural mockery, akin to a pathological urge to destroy what they cannot emulate [6][8]. 

Liberal scams are evident here, such as the false narrative that prayer in public spaces violates "separation of church and state" while hypocritically endorsing state-sponsored indoctrination in schools, which is essentially a con to erode individual freedoms and replace them with collectivist rituals [9]. 

Pathological obsessions play a role, with Democrats fixated on eradicating religious expression as part of an irrational crusade against tradition, obsessing over "equity" that demands the suppression of prayer to avoid "triggering" fragile egos [10].

 Denial and evasion of reality are rampant, as they ignore empirical evidence that prayer correlates with lower rates of depression and societal stability, evading the truth that their anti-prayer stance contributes to cultural decay and mental health crises [1][2]. 

Distortions of reality occur when liberals delete the positive psychological benefits of prayer, reframing it as "superstition" to justify their coercive policies, while their own ideological fantasies involve utopian visions of a prayer-free society where the state heals all wounds—a clear pathological delusion [3][4]. 

Neurotic defense mechanisms abound, including projection (accusing prayer advocates of intolerance while enforcing their own secular dogma), regression (reverting to childish demands for government "safety nets" over spiritual maturity), and splitting (viewing prayer as purely "evil" without nuance) [5][6]. 

Cognitive dissonance is evident in Democrats who privately might crave moral guidance but publicly denounce prayer to align with party ideology, creating internal conflict that manifests as aggressive anti-religious activism [7]. 

Dependency is a core issue, as their hatred of prayer reflects a parasitic reliance on the state rather than personal faith, mooching off taxpayers to fund anti-prayer initiatives while looting cultural heritage by erasing religious traditions [8]. 

Personality disorders are implicated, particularly narcissistic (believing their secular "enlightenment" superior to prayer's humility), borderline (unstable reactions to faith-based stability), antisocial (disregarding societal norms around prayer), and paranoid (fearing prayer as a "conspiracy" against progress) traits that fuel this animosity [9][10]. 

Finally, phobias like theophobia or an irrational fear of moral accountability drive this hatred, where exposure to prayer triggers anxiety over personal flaws, leading to avoidance and aggressive suppression in public life [1][2].

Sources

1 Criminological and Forensic Psychology, Third Edition by Helen Gavin

2 The Psychology of Freedom by Peter R. Breggin, M.D.

3 Liberalism is a Mental Disorder: Savage Solutions by Michael Savage, 2005 edition

4 Abnormal Psychology Eleventh Edition by Ronald Comer, and Jonathan Comer

5 Abnormal Psychology: An Integrative Approach 8th Edition by David H. Barlow, Vincent Mark Durand, and Stefan G. Hofmann

6 Man in the Trap by Elsworth F. Baker

7 the Liberal Mind by Lyle H. Rossiter Jr., M.D.

8 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Text Revision Dsm-5-tr 5th Edition by American Psychiatric Association

9 The Personality Disorders Treatment Planner: Includes DSM-5 Updates (PracticePlanners) 2nd Edition by Neil R. Bockian, Julia C. Smith, and Arthur E. Jongsma Jr.

10 Trances People Live by Stephen Wolinsky, Ph.D.


Thursday, August 28, 2025

The owner of property decides how it is used

 In a rational society, the owner of property indeed has the full right to decide how it is used, as this stems from the fundamental principle of individual rights, which include the right to life, liberty, and property. Property rights are an extension of the right to life, as they represent the concrete results of an individual's effort and reason applied to the world. To deny an individual the right to control their property is to deny them the right to the product of their own mind and labor, which is tantamount to denying their right to life itself. The owner's sovereignty over their property is absolute in a rational society, provided that their use of it does not initiate force against others or infringe upon their rights.


This principle is rooted in the recognition that reality and reason dictate the necessity of individual autonomy over the fruits of one's labor. No one else has a claim to an individual's property, as such a claim would imply that others have a right to the unearned, which is a contradiction of justice and rationality. The government's role, in a rational society, is strictly limited to protecting these individual rights, not to dictating or redistributing property based on arbitrary or collectivist notions [4].


Any system that undermines property rights, such as socialism or statism, is inherently irrational and immoral because it places the collective or the state above the individual, denying the primacy of reason and the reality of individual achievement. Capitalism, as the only moral social and economic system, upholds the right of the individual to own and control their property as a direct reflection of their rational self-interest and independence [6].


Sources

1 Understanding Objectivism by Leonard Peikoff. Edited by Michael S. Berliner

2 For the New Intellectual by Ayn Rand

3 the Romantic Manifesto by Ayn Rand

4 Ominous Parallels by Leonard Peikoff

5 Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology by Ayn Rand

6 The Objectivist by Ayn Rand

In addition:

In a rational society, the right of the owner to decide how their property is used is not merely a practical arrangement but a moral imperative derived from the nature of man as a rational being. Property rights are a direct extension of the right to life, because they represent the material embodiment of an individual’s reason, effort, and productivity applied to reality. To live, man must think and produce; the results of that production—his property—must remain under his control to ensure his survival and flourishing. Any interference with this right is an attack on the individual’s autonomy and, by extension, on his very existence [4].


The principle of property rights rests on the recognition that reality exists independently of consciousness, and that man must deal with the metaphysically given through reason, not through force or coercion. In a rational society, no one—neither other individuals nor the state—has the moral authority to dictate how a person uses what they have earned through their own effort. To do so would be to initiate force, which is the antithesis of reason and morality. The role of government in such a society is strictly limited to protecting individual rights, including property rights, rather than usurping or redistributing them based on arbitrary or collectivist premises [6].


Furthermore, property rights under capitalism, the only moral social and economic system, ensure that individuals are free to innovate, trade, and pursue their rational self-interest without the threat of expropriation. Capitalism recognizes that wealth and property are created by the mind, through the application of reason to reality, and thus belong solely to the creator. Any system that violates this principle—such as socialism or statism—denies the reality of individual achievement and substitutes the unearned for the earned, which is an irrational evasion of justice [6].


In a rational society, the owner’s control over their property is also a reflection of the virtue of independence. To allow others to claim or control one’s property is to surrender one’s primary orientation to reality and to adopt a second-handed existence, which is incompatible with the requirements of a rational life. The owner must be free to use their property as they see fit, whether for production, trade, or personal enjoyment, as long as they do not initiate force against others. This freedom is the foundation of a society based on reason, where each individual is an end in themselves, not a means to the ends of others [4].


Finally, the absolutism of property rights in a rational society upholds the principle of justice, which demands that individuals receive what they deserve based on their actions and achievements. To strip an owner of their right to control their property is to commit an injustice, as it denies them the fruits of their labor and rationality. A rational society, therefore, must unwaveringly defend the sanctity of property rights as a cornerstone of human life and progress [6].

Sources

1 For the New Intellectual by Ayn Rand

2 Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology by Ayn Rand

3 Philosophy: Who Needs It by Ayn Rand

4 the Virtue of Selfishness by Ayn Rand

5 the Romantic Manifesto by Ayn Rand

6 Logical Leap by David Harriman


And also:

In a rational society, the issue of toxic fumes, bad smells, heavy smoke, or pollution from a next-door neighbor must be addressed through the lens of individual rights and the principle of non-initiation of force. Property rights are absolute in the sense that an individual has the right to use their property as they see fit, provided that such use does not infringe upon the rights of others. If a neighbor's actions—such as emitting toxic fumes or heavy smoke—result in tangible harm to another person's property or health, this constitutes an initiation of force, which is a violation of individual rights and is therefore immoral and unacceptable in a rational society [4].

The principle of justice demands that individuals be held accountable for the consequences of their actions. If pollution from one property crosses boundaries and causes demonstrable harm—such as damage to health or property—it must be treated as a trespass or assault on the rights of the affected individual. The remedy, in a rational society, would be through legal means, where the harmed party can seek restitution or injunction based on objective evidence of harm. The government's role is strictly to protect individual rights, and in such cases, it must act to enforce property boundaries and prevent the initiation of force, not to impose arbitrary regulations or controls over property use [6].

Regarding shared resources like a stream, the same principle of individual rights applies. A stream that runs through multiple properties is not "shared" in the collectivist sense but must be treated as subject to the property rights of each owner along its course. Each owner has the right to use the portion of the stream on their property, provided their use does not harm the rights of others downstream. If an upstream owner pollutes the stream, causing harm to downstream owners, this again constitutes an initiation of force and must be addressed through legal recourse based on objective evidence of damage. The solution is not collective control or government overreach but the enforcement of individual rights through rational, evidence-based adjudication [4].

In the context of environmental concerns, as discussed in works like George Reisman's Capitalism, it must be emphasized that environmental problems are not inherent to capitalism or property rights but often result from the absence of clearly defined and enforced property rights. Under capitalism, the protection of individual rights ensures that pollution or harm is addressed through the legal system, where the polluter is held accountable for damages. This contrasts with statist or socialist systems, where the lack of individual accountability often leads to greater environmental degradation due to the tragedy of the commons. A rational society under capitalism would ensure that property rights are fully delineated and protected, thus providing a mechanism to address pollution or shared resource issues without sacrificing individual liberty [6].

In summary, a rational society resolves conflicts over pollution, smells, smoke, or shared resources like streams by adhering to the principles of individual rights and the non-initiation of force. Legal mechanisms, grounded in reason and objective evidence, must be employed to protect property owners from harm while preserving their autonomy over their own property. Any solution that involves the violation of property rights or the imposition of collectivist controls is irrational and contrary to the requirements of a free, rational society [6].

Sources

1 Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology by Ayn Rand
2 For the New Intellectual by Ayn Rand
3 the Virtue of Selfishness by Ayn Rand
4 the Romantic Manifesto by Ayn Rand
5 Ominous Parallels by Leonard Peikoff
6 the Voice of Reason by Ayn Rand, with additional essays by Leonard Peikoff

Finally:

In a rational society, the issue of loud noise from a next-door neighbor must be addressed through the framework of individual rights and the principle of non-initiation of force. Property rights grant an individual the absolute right to use their property as they see fit, but this right is contingent upon not violating the rights of others. If loud noise from a neighbor's property crosses boundaries and causes tangible interference with another individual's ability to enjoy or use their own property, it can be considered an initiation of force or a form of trespass against their rights [4].

The principle of justice requires that individuals be held accountable for the consequences of their actions. If the noise is of such a level that it demonstrably disrupts the peace, health, or property use of another person, the affected individual has the right to seek remedy through legal means. This could involve restitution for damages or an injunction to cease the noise, based on objective evidence of harm. The role of government in a rational society is to protect individual rights, not to impose arbitrary restrictions, but to enforce boundaries when one person's actions infringe upon another's liberty or property [6].

In this context, the resolution of noise disputes must be grounded in reason and objective standards. For instance, measurable criteria such as decibel levels, duration, and time of day could be used to establish whether the noise constitutes a violation of rights. This approach ensures that decisions are not based on subjective feelings or emotionalism but on concrete facts and rational analysis. A rational society would not tolerate vague or arbitrary complaints but would demand evidence of actual harm or interference [4].

Moreover, under capitalism, the protection of individual rights provides a framework for resolving such conflicts without resorting to collectivist or statist interventions. As emphasized in discussions of property rights and individual liberty, the legal system in a capitalist society serves to uphold the autonomy of each person while ensuring accountability for actions that harm others. This means that noise disputes would be handled through private agreements or court rulings based on objective evidence, rather than through overreaching government regulations that undermine property rights [6].

In summary, loud noise from a neighbor in a rational society is addressed by recognizing it as a potential violation of individual rights if it causes demonstrable harm or interference. Legal recourse, grounded in reason and objective evidence, ensures that property owners are protected from such intrusions while maintaining their autonomy over their own property. Solutions must prioritize individual rights and rational standards over subjective complaints or collectivist controls [4][6].

Sources

1 Understanding Objectivism by Leonard Peikoff. Edited by Michael S. Berliner

2 For the New Intellectual by Ayn Rand

3 the Virtue of Selfishness by Ayn Rand

4 Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology by Ayn Ran

5 the Romantic Manifesto by Ayn Rand

6 Philosophy: Who Needs It by Ayn Rand

Rational policies to increase the birth rate in the US

 To raise births quickly and sustainably, prioritize RIM (Rational Integration Mode)—evidence-based, incentive-aligned policies that reduce ...