Psychology: some voters say UnitedHealthcare CEO murder is acceptable

 The belief that a significant percentage of young voters find the murder of a CEO acceptable reflects a troubling mindset that can be linked to various psychological issues. This perspective may stem from a deep-rooted sense of injustice, feelings of powerlessness, and a distorted understanding of morality and accountability.

Individuals who endorse such extreme views may display signs of maladaptive thought patterns, which can be indicative of underlying personality disorders or emotional disturbances. For example, those who advocate for violence in response to perceived grievances may exhibit symptoms associated with antisocial personality disorder, characterized by a lack of empathy, disregard for societal norms, and impulsivity.

Additionally, the phenomenon could be linked to ideological possession, where individuals become so entrenched in a belief system that they lose the ability to critically evaluate their thoughts and feelings. This state can lead to delusional thinking, where individuals may justify extreme behaviors as acceptable forms of protest or resistance against what they perceive as systemic oppression.

Moreover, feelings of victimization and entitlement may contribute to a collective mindset that rationalizes violence as a legitimate form of expression. This may also reflect a broader societal trend toward fostering dependency on governmental systems, which can undermine personal responsibility and moral agency. Such dynamics are often exacerbated by exposure to radical ideologies that glorify rebellion against authority, further entrenching these harmful beliefs [1][4][6].

In summary, the acceptance of such extreme viewpoints among young voters may be rooted in a combination of personality disorders, ideological fixation, and a societal narrative that minimizes individual accountability, ultimately contributing to a troubling psychological landscape.

Sources 

1 Abnormal Psychology: An Integrative Approach 8th Edition by David H. Barlow, Vincent Mark Durand, and Stefan G. Hofmann 

2 Man in the Trap by Elsworth F. Baker  

3 Liberalism is a Mental Disorder: Savage Solutions by Michael Savage, 2005 edition 

4 The Personality Disorders Treatment Planner: Includes DSM-5 Updates (PracticePlanners) 2nd Edition by Neil R. Bockian, Julia C. Smith, and Arthur E. Jongsma Jr.  

5 Criminological and Forensic Psychology Third Edition by Helen Gavin  

6 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Text Revision Dsm-5-tr 5th

In addition:

The acceptance of extreme viewpoints, such as the notion that violence against a CEO is justified, can be attributed to several psychological factors that intertwine with the prevailing cultural narratives among young voters.

First and foremost, there is a significant influence of groupthink and peer pressure, particularly in environments dominated by radical ideologies. Young individuals may feel compelled to adopt extreme positions to gain acceptance within their social circles, leading to a form of cognitive dissonance where the individual’s internal moral compass is overshadowed by the group's beliefs [1][4]. This phenomenon can create a feedback loop, reinforcing radical ideas and diminishing the capacity for critical thought.

Additionally, feelings of disenfranchisement and victimhood are prevalent among those who gravitate toward extreme ideologies. Many young people perceive themselves as victims of a system that is rigged against them, which can foster resentment and a desire for retribution against perceived oppressors. This victim mentality can lead to rationalizing violent acts as a means of correcting injustices, reflecting an inability to engage with complex social issues through rational discourse [2][5].

Moreover, the normalization of violence in media and popular culture may desensitize individuals to the moral implications of such actions. This exposure can blur the lines between acceptable forms of protest and extreme measures, allowing some to see murder as a valid form of political expression or social change [3][6]. Such desensitization can be indicative of deeper emotional or behavioral issues, including a lack of empathy or an inclination toward antisocial behavior.

Lastly, the embrace of ideologies that advocate for collectivism over individualism can diminish personal responsibility. When individuals adopt a worldview that prioritizes group identity over personal accountability, they may become more susceptible to justifying extreme actions as necessary for the greater good, regardless of the moral consequences [4][5].

In summary, the acceptance of extreme viewpoints among young voters is a complex interplay of group dynamics, feelings of victimization, cultural influences, and a shift away from personal responsibility. These factors can create a fertile ground for radical beliefs to take root, ultimately leading to dangerous justifications for violence and coercion.

Sources 

1 The Psychology of Freedom by Peter R. Breggin, M.D. 

2 Criminological and Forensic Psychology Third Edition by Helen Gavin  

3 Man in the Trap by Elsworth F. Baker  

4 Abnormal Psychology: An Integrative Approach 8th Edition by David H. Barlow, Vincent Mark Durand, and Stefan G. Hofmann 

5 Liberalism is a Mental Disorder: Savage Solutions by Michael Savage, 2005 edition 

6 The Personality Disorders Treatment Planner: Includes DSM-5 Updates (PracticePlanners) 2nd Edition by Neil R. Bockian, Julia C. Smith, and Arthur E. Jongsma Jr.  

How to collect a $15 million legal judgment

 Winning a judgment of $15 million is a significant legal victory, but collecting the awarded amount can sometimes be challenging, especially if the debtor is unwilling or unable to pay. Here’s how you can enforce your judgment effectively:

---

1. Understand the Judgment and Its Implications

• Ensure the judgment is final and enforceable (i.e., no pending appeals or motions to contest it).
• Confirm the judgment includes interest and outlines any payment deadlines.

---

2. Locate the Debtor’s Assets

• Asset Discovery: Use post-judgment discovery tools to identify the debtor’s assets. These may include:
  • Bank accounts
  • Real estate
  • Vehicles
  • Investments
  • Business holdings
  • Other personal property
• Subpoena Records: Request bank statements, tax returns, and other financial documents through a court order.
• Hire an Asset Recovery Expert: A private investigator or forensic accountant can help uncover hidden or undisclosed assets.

---

3. Obtain a Writ of Execution

A writ of execution is a court order that allows you to seize the debtor’s property or assets to satisfy the judgment. You’ll typically file this with the same court that issued your judgment.

---

4. Methods of Enforcement

Depending on the debtor’s assets and jurisdiction, you can take the following actions:

A. Wage Garnishment

• If the debtor is employed, you can request the court to garnish a portion of their wages directly from their employer.

B. Bank Account Levy

• With a court order, you can freeze and seize funds from the debtor’s bank accounts. This requires knowledge of where they bank.

C. Property Liens

• Place a lien on the debtor’s real estate or other property. When they try to sell or refinance the property, your judgment must be paid before the transaction can proceed.

D. Seizure of Personal or Business Assets

• Physical property, such as vehicles or equipment, can be seized and sold at auction to satisfy the debt.

E. Charging Orders

• If the debtor owns shares in a business or LLC, you can get a charging order to claim their distributions or profits.

F. Garnish Investment Accounts

• Seize funds from the debtor’s brokerage accounts or retirement accounts, depending on state and federal exemptions.

---

5. Leverage Post-Judgment Interest

Judgments typically accrue interest over time. If the debtor delays payment, this can incentivize quicker resolution, as the total amount owed will increase.

---

6. Consider Contempt of Court

If the debtor refuses to comply with court orders (e.g., providing financial disclosures), you can request that the court hold them in contempt, which may result in fines or even jail time.

---

7. Work with Law Enforcement or Court Officers

Sheriffs, marshals, or court-appointed officials often assist in enforcing judgments, such as conducting property seizures or executing writs.

---

8. Renew the Judgment

If the debtor continues to avoid payment and the judgment expires (state laws vary, often 10 years), you can renew it before expiration to extend your ability to collect.

---

9. Negotiate or Settle

• If full payment is unlikely, consider negotiating a settlement. Debtors may agree to pay a lump sum or installments in exchange for a reduced amount.

---

10. Hire an Attorney or Collection Agency

• Judgment Enforcement Attorney: Specializes in collecting large judgments and navigating the legal processes.
• Collection Agencies: They will attempt to collect on your behalf, often taking a percentage of the recovered funds.

---

Key Challenges

• Insolvency: If the debtor genuinely lacks assets, collection becomes difficult. You might have to wait until their financial situation improves.
• Bankruptcy: If the debtor files for bankruptcy, your judgment may be discharged unless it falls under certain exceptions (e.g., fraud).

---

For a judgment of this size, professional assistance is usually necessary to ensure proper enforcement and maximize recovery. An experienced attorney or asset recovery specialist can be invaluable.

The Constitution has primacy over the "spirit of Aloha" of Hawaii

 The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land" and take priority over any conflicting state laws

This principle applies to all states, including Hawaii, and means that federal law generally takes precedence over state law when there is a conflict

Federal Preemption

The doctrine of federal preemption, derived from the Supremacy Clause, holds that federal law supersedes state law in areas where they conflict

This principle applies regardless of whether the conflicting laws come from legislatures, courts, administrative agencies, or constitutions

.

Emotion chain: from envy to the destruction of the good for being the good

 According to Ayn Rand's philosophy, the progression from envy to the destruction of the good for being the good involves a chain of emotions and irrational premises rooted in the rejection of reason and reality. This chain begins with envy, which she describes as the hatred of the good for being the good. Envy arises from a sense of inferiority and resentment towards the success or virtues of others, stemming from the refusal to recognize and accept one's own shortcomings or the effort required for achievement [5].

Envy then leads to resentment, a deeper emotional reaction where the individual actively despises the virtues or values in others that they lack. This resentment is not directed at any actual harm caused by the virtuous person but purely at their existence as a reminder of the envious individual's inadequacy. This emotion is fueled by a rejection of reality and an evasion of the metaphysical fact that one's failures are self-inflicted and not caused by those who succeed [5][4].

Resentment evolves into hatred, where the individual begins to actively wish harm upon the person or entity that represents the good. This hatred is irrational and unjust, as it stems not from any wrongdoing by the virtuous individual but from the envious person's refusal to confront their own irrationality and failure [3][5].

Finally, this hatred culminates in the destruction of the good for being the good, an act of nihilism. At this stage, the envious individual seeks to obliterate the source of their envy and resentment, not for any practical gain but merely to destroy what they see as a threat to their self-esteem. This is the ultimate rejection of values and reason, as it involves the annihilation of that which is good, productive, and virtuous simply because it exists and serves as a reminder of their own evasion of reality and rational effort [5][6].

In summary, the progression is as follows: envy → resentment → hatred → destruction of the good for being the good. Each step represents a deeper descent into irrationality and the evasion of reality, fueled by the rejection of reason and the refusal to take responsibility for one's own life and choices [5].

Sources 

1 For the New Intellectual by Ayn Rand 

2 the Romantic Manifesto by Ayn Rand  

3 Philosophy: Who Needs It by Ayn Rand 

4 the Anti-industrial Revolution by Ayn Rand 

5 Ominous Parallels by Leonard Peikoff 

6 Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology by Ayn Rand 

In addition:

In real life, the chain of emotions from envy to the destruction of the good for being the good can be observed in various scenarios, particularly where individuals or groups attack success or achievement out of resentment. Here are some examples:

1. The Attacks on Successful Individuals or Businesses: A common example is when a highly successful business or entrepreneur is vilified not because they caused harm, but because their success highlights the failure or envy of others. For example, innovators like Steve Jobs or Elon Musk have been criticized and attacked, not for any moral wrongdoing, but because their achievements set a standard that others resent and find difficult to match. This reflects the transition from envy to resentment and eventually to an attempt to harm or destroy the successful individual’s reputation or work [5][6].

2. The Destruction of Wealth Producers: In many instances, political or ideological movements have targeted the wealthy or productive individuals under the guise of "fairness" or "equality." For example, excessive taxation or expropriation of wealth from successful entrepreneurs is often justified by envy-based rhetoric, portraying their success as inherently exploitative. The goal is not to create new wealth but to tear down those who have succeeded, ultimately leading to the destruction of the good for being the good [5].

3. Cultural Nihilism in Arts and Literature: An example of this chain can be seen in the rejection of excellence in art or literature. Ayn Rand herself criticized modern art movements that sought to destroy the standards of beauty and technical skill in favor of nihilistic expressions. This destruction of aesthetic value often stems from envy towards those who embody excellence in creative fields. The resentment of talent and achievement translates into an effort to degrade and obliterate the very concept of artistic greatness [4][5].

4. Historical Examples in Collectivist Systems: In collectivist regimes such as the Soviet Union, the persecution of the "kulaks" (wealthier peasants) is a clear example of this chain. These individuals, who were more productive and successful farmers, became targets of envy and resentment. Their success was vilified as exploitation, and they were ultimately stripped of their property, imprisoned, or killed. This was not driven by rational justice but by the desire to destroy the good for being the good, as their competence and productivity contradicted the collectivist ideology [5][6].

These examples illustrate how envy, when unchecked, can evolve into resentment and hatred, ultimately leading to acts of destruction against those who embody the virtues of productivity, success, and excellence. This progression is a moral and practical rejection of reason, reality, and individual achievement [5][6].

Sources 

1 For the New Intellectual by Ayn Rand 

2 the Romantic Manifesto by Ayn Rand  

3 Philosophy: Who Needs It by Ayn Rand 

4 the Anti-industrial Revolution by Ayn Rand 

5 Ominous Parallels by Leonard Peikoff 

6 Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology by Ayn Rand 

how does "lived experience" nullify objective truth for liberals/leftards

 The concept of "lived experience" can undermine objective truth in several ways. Primarily, it prioritizes subjective narratives over empirical evidence, leading to a scenario where personal feelings and interpretations are considered equally valid as factual data. This approach can result in a dismissal of objective analyses that rely on statistical data or scientific research, as the emphasis shifts to individual stories and emotions [1][2].

Furthermore, when lived experiences are elevated to the status of truth, it can create a hierarchy of truths based on identity, where some voices are deemed more legitimate than others due to their personal experiences with oppression or marginalization. This can lead to an exclusionary discourse that marginalizes viewpoints that do not align with the dominant narratives of suffering, potentially stifling healthy debate and critical thinking [3][4].

Additionally, the reliance on lived experience can foster a culture of victimhood, where individuals may feel entitled to define their realities without regard for objective standards. This can result in a reluctance to engage with opposing viewpoints or evidence that contradicts personal beliefs, thereby creating an echo chamber that reinforces subjective truths at the expense of more comprehensive understandings of complex social issues [5][6].

In summary, while "lived experience" holds value in recognizing personal narratives, its elevation above objective truth can lead to a distortion of reality, where emotional truths overshadow empirical evidence, ultimately affecting rational discourse and critical engagement with social issues.

Sources 

1  Abnormal Psychology: An Integrative Approach 8th Edition by David H. Barlow, Vincent Mark Durand, and Stefan G. Hofmann 

2  The Psychology of Freedom by Peter R. Breggin, M.D. 

3  Man in the Trap by Elsworth F. Baker  

4  Liberalism is a Mental Disorder: Savage Solutions by Michael Savage, 2005 edition 

5  The Personality Disorders Treatment Planner: Includes DSM-5 Updates (PracticePlanners) 2nd Edition by Neil R. Bockian, Julia C. Smith, and Arthur E. Jongsma Jr.  

6 Criminological and Forensic Psychology Third Edition by Helen Gavin 

In addition:

The concept of "lived experience" can significantly distort reality and hinder critical engagement with social issues in various ways. One major concern is that it often prioritizes personal narratives over objective data and empirical evidence. When individuals share their lived experiences, these personal stories can overshadow objective facts, leading to a situation where emotional truths are considered just as valid as, or even more valid than, statistical evidence or scientific research [1][2].

This emphasis on subjective experience can create a form of cognitive bias known as confirmation bias, where individuals primarily seek out information that supports their personal narratives while dismissing or disregarding contradicting evidence. As a result, critical discourse may become stifled, as people feel less inclined to engage with viewpoints that challenge their experiences or beliefs [3][4].

Additionally, the elevation of lived experience can lead to a kind of moral absolutism, where certain experiences are seen as inherently more valid or truthful than others, particularly those that fit within the framework of oppression or victimhood. This can create an environment where dissenting opinions are not only discouraged but actively silenced, as individuals may fear backlash for questioning the validity of someone else's experience [5][6].

Moreover, the focus on lived experience can foster a culture of dependency on emotional validation rather than encouraging critical thinking and problem-solving. When discussions around social issues become centered on personal feelings rather than objective analysis, it can lead to a lack of constructive dialogue about potential solutions or alternative viewpoints, ultimately hindering progress in addressing complex societal problems [1][2].

In conclusion, while lived experiences provide valuable insights into individual circumstances, their elevation above objective truth can distort reality and hinder critical engagement with social issues. This dynamic can lead to confirmation biases, moral absolutism, and a culture of emotional dependency that detracts from rational discourse and effective problem-solving.

Sources 

1 Abnormal Psychology: An Integrative Approach 8th Edition by David H. Barlow, Vincent Mark Durand, and Stefan G. Hofmann 

2 The Psychology of Freedom by Peter R. Breggin, M.D. 

3 Man in the Trap by Elsworth F. Baker  

4 the Liberal Mind by Lyle H. Rossiter Jr., M.D. 

5 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Text Revision Dsm-5-tr 5th Edition by American Psychiatric Association 

6 Liberalism is a Mental Disorder: Savage Solutions by Michael Savage, 2005 edition