Thursday, October 24, 2024

Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) contradicts free market economics

 Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) is a heterodox macroeconomic theory that challenges traditional views on government spending, taxation, and debt management. It posits that countries with monetary sovereignty—those that issue their own fiat currency, such as the United States, United Kingdom, Japan, and Canada—are not constrained by revenues when it comes to federal government spending.

Core Principles of MMT

  • Monetary Sovereignty: MMT asserts that governments with control over their own currency can create money to fund public spending without needing to rely on taxes or borrowing. This means they can never "run out of money" like households or businesses might.
  • Role of Taxes: In MMT, taxes are not primarily used to fund government spending. Instead, they serve to control inflation, manage aggregate demand, and ensure currency stability. Taxes also help redistribute wealth and influence economic behavior.
  • Government Deficits: MMT argues that government deficits are not inherently problematic and can be used strategically to stimulate economic growth and achieve full employment. The theory suggests that deficits inject money into the economy, which can boost savings and investment.
  • Inflation Control: The primary constraint on government spending in MMT is inflation. Proponents argue that inflation only becomes a risk when the economy is at full employment. To manage inflation, MMT suggests using fiscal tools like tax increases rather than solely relying on monetary policy.

Implications 

MMT has significant implications for economic policy, suggesting that governments can pursue more aggressive fiscal policies to achieve social goals like full employment and infrastructure development without worrying about budget deficits in the traditional sense. 

Overall, Modern Monetary Theory presents a paradigm shift in understanding fiscal policy, emphasizing the potential of sovereign currency issuance to support expansive economic policies while highlighting the importance of managing inflationary pressures

Criticisms

From a free market laissez-faire capitalism perspective, Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) raises several concerns and contradictions with core principles of free market economics.

Firstly, the concept of monetary sovereignty in MMT, which suggests that governments can create money to fund public spending without relying on taxes or borrowing, conflicts with the free market principle that emphasizes limited government intervention and fiscal responsibility. Free market economics stresses the importance of sound money and fiscal discipline to maintain economic stability and prevent inflationary pressures [1].

Regarding the role of taxes, MMT proposes that taxes are primarily tools for controlling inflation and managing demand rather than funding government spending. However, free market advocates argue that taxes distort economic incentives and reduce individual and business productivity. They see taxes as a necessary means to fund essential government functions, but any increase should be minimal to avoid hindering economic growth [2].

On government deficits, free market economics generally views deficits with skepticism, as they can lead to unsustainable debt levels and potential economic instability. While MMT suggests that deficits are not inherently problematic and can stimulate growth, free market proponents warn that excessive government spending and debt accumulation can crowd out private investment and lead to long-term economic consequences [3].

Inflation control is another area of contention. MMT's reliance on fiscal tools like tax adjustments to manage inflation contrasts with the free market preference for monetary policy tools, such as interest rate adjustments, to maintain price stability. Free market economics emphasizes that inflation control should be primarily the responsibility of an independent central bank to prevent political manipulation of economic policy [4].

Overall, while MMT presents an alternative view on fiscal policy, free market economics remains critical of its assumptions about the limitless ability of governments to create money without economic consequences. The potential for excessive inflation and market distortions are significant concerns for free market advocates [5].

Sources

1 Man, Economy, and State with Power and Market, Scholar's Edition, by Murray Rothbard
2 Classical Economics by Murry Rothbard
3 Capitalism by George Reisman
4 Economic Thought Before Adam Smith by Murry Rothbard
5 Marxism/socialism, a sociopathic philosophy, conceived in gross error and ignorance, culminating in economic chaos, enslavement, terror, and mass murder by George Reisman
6 The Birth of Plenty by William J. Bernstein

In addition:
Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) differs significantly from and contradicts free market economics in several key ways:

Role of Government

  • MMT: Advocates for a large, active role of government in managing the economy through fiscal policy and direct spending.
  • Free Market: Favors minimal government intervention, believing markets are self-regulating and most efficient when left alone.

Monetary Policy

  • MMT: Argues that monetary policy (interest rate adjustments) is largely ineffective. Proposes keeping interest rates near zero permanently.
  • Free Market: Sees monetary policy as a crucial tool for managing inflation and economic cycles.

Fiscal Policy and Deficits

  • MMT: Claims government deficits are not inherently problematic for countries with monetary sovereignty. Advocates using fiscal policy aggressively to achieve full employment.
  • Free Market: Views large government deficits as potentially harmful, leading to crowding out of private investment and long-term economic instability.

Inflation Control

  • MMT: Proposes using taxation to control inflation, rather than monetary policy.
  • Free Market: Relies primarily on central bank monetary policy to manage inflation.

Employment

  • MMT: Supports a government job guarantee to achieve full employment.
  • Free Market: Believes free markets naturally tend towards full employment without government intervention.

Resource Allocation

  • MMT: Implies government can efficiently allocate resources through spending and employment programs.
  • Free Market: Asserts that price signals and market competition lead to the most efficient allocation of resources.

View of Money

  • MMT: Sees money as a public monopoly, with government as the monopoly issuer.
  • Free Market: Views money primarily as a medium of exchange, with its value determined by market forces.
These fundamental differences highlight how MMT contradicts many core principles of free market economics, proposing a much more expansive role for government in economic management and challenging traditional views on monetary and fiscal policy.


Tuesday, October 22, 2024

The Mental Illness of the Liberal Mind and failure to achieve competence

 The Liberal Mind and failure to achieve adult competence: signs and symptoms of the mental illness, causes, treatment, and prevention.

Failure to achieve adult competence can manifest through various signs and symptoms, often indicating a struggle with personal responsibility, emotional regulation, and social interactions. 


Here are some of the key indicators:

The Liberal Mind: an economically and socially dependent adult-child, who blames others for his failures, seeks parental surrogates, attempts to manipulate the political system, and  feels entitled to coerce goods and services from others, while ignoring their rights to refuse his demands [1].

Inability to Make Decisions: Adults may struggle to make choices, relying heavily on others for direction, which can signify a lack of self-confidence and independence [2].

Avoidance of Responsibilities: A tendency to evade responsibilities or adult tasks is a critical sign of failure to achieve competence. This can include neglecting work, relationships, and financial obligations [5].

Emotional Instability: Difficulty managing emotions, such as excessive anger, anxiety, or sadness, may indicate an inability to cope with adult challenges [4].

Social Withdrawal: Avoiding social interactions or failing to maintain healthy relationships can signal an inability to navigate adult social landscapes [3].

Lack of Goal Orientation: Individuals may exhibit a disinterest in setting and pursuing personal or professional goals, reflecting a defeatist attitude towards life [1].

Dependency on Others: A reliance on family or friends for emotional support or decision-making can be a marker of immaturity, suggesting an inability to function independently [6].

Poor Problem-Solving Skills: Difficulty in addressing challenges effectively can demonstrate a lack of critical thinking skills, which are essential for adult competence [2].

Defensive Attitudes: Adults may become defensive or hostile when confronted with criticism, which can be a sign of low self-esteem and a fear of failure [5].

These signs and symptoms collectively highlight a failure to transition into full adult competency, often rooted in psychological factors such as anxiety, low self-esteem, or avoidance behaviors. Addressing these issues through therapy or personal development can help individuals cultivate the skills necessary for a competent adult life.

Sources

1 the Liberal Mind by Lyle H. Rossiter Jr., M.D.

2 The Psychology of Freedom by Peter R. Breggin, M.D.

3 The Personality Disorders Treatment Planner: Includes DSM-5 Updates (PracticePlanners) 2nd Edition by Neil R. Bockian, Julia C. Smith, and Arthur E. Jongsma Jr.

4 Abnormal Psychology: An Integrative Approach 8th Edition by David H. Barlow, Vincent Mark Durand, and Stefan G. Hofmann

5 Liberalism is a Mental Disorder: Savage Solutions by Michael Savage, 2005 edition

6 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Text Revision Dsm-5-tr 5th Edition by American Psychiatric Association


Causes:

The failure to achieve adult competence can stem from a variety of psychological, social, and environmental factors. 

Here are some key causes:

Emotional Instability: Inconsistent emotional responses can hinder an individual’s ability to handle adult responsibilities. Those with emotional instability may struggle with self-regulation, leading to impulsive decisions or withdrawal from challenging situations [4].

Social Withdrawal: An inability to engage socially can result from anxiety or fear of judgment, which may prevent individuals from developing necessary interpersonal skills. This withdrawal can create a cycle of isolation that reinforces feelings of incompetence [3].

Poor Problem-Solving Skills: A lack of exposure to problem-solving opportunities during formative years can lead to difficulties in adult life. Individuals who have not learned to navigate challenges effectively may feel overwhelmed when faced with responsibilities [2].

Dependency on Parents or Authority Figures: Over-reliance on parental figures or authority can stifle independence, inhibiting the development of self-sufficiency and confidence in making decisions [6].

Low Self-Esteem: Individuals with low self-esteem may fear failure, leading to avoidance of challenges that are essential for growth and competence. This fear can create a self-fulfilling prophecy, where the avoidance of tasks leads to a lack of competence [5].

Cultural and Societal Influences: Societal expectations and cultural norms can shape an individual’s perception of adulthood and competence. In environments that emphasize conformity over individuality, personal growth may be stunted [1].

Trauma and Adverse Childhood Experiences: Past trauma or adverse experiences can lead to emotional dysregulation and an inability to cope with adult responsibilities. Such experiences can create long-term psychological barriers that impede personal development [4].

Lack of Education or Skill Development: An inadequate education or lack of opportunities for skill acquisition can leave individuals unprepared for adult life, resulting in feelings of inadequacy and incompetence [2][5].

These causes highlight the complex interplay of psychological, social, and environmental factors that contribute to the failure to achieve adult competence. Understanding these influences can aid in addressing and overcoming the associated challenges.

Sources

1 The Psychology of Freedom by Peter R. Breggin, M.D.
2 the Liberal Mind by Lyle H. Rossiter Jr., M.D.
3 Abnormal Psychology: An Integrative Approach 8th Edition by David H. Barlow, Vincent Mark Durand, and Stefan G. Hofmann
4 Man in the Trap by Elsworth F. Baker
5 The Personality Disorders Treatment Planner: Includes DSM-5 Updates (PracticePlanners) 2nd Edition by Neil R. Bockian, Julia C. Smith, and Arthur E. Jongsma Jr.
6 Criminological and Forensic Psychology Third Edition by Helen Gavin

Treatment:

Treatment for failure to achieve adult competence involves a multifaceted approach that addresses the various psychological, social, and educational factors contributing to this issue. Here are some key strategies:

Therapeutic Interventions: Engaging in therapy, such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), can help individuals develop better emotional regulation and coping strategies. Therapy can also address underlying issues such as low self-esteem and trauma, fostering greater self-awareness and resilience [4].

Skill Development Programs: Providing training in essential life skills, such as financial management, communication, and problem-solving, can empower individuals to feel more competent and confident in their abilities. These programs can be tailored to meet the specific needs of individuals, addressing gaps in education and experience [2][5].

Social Skills Training: For those experiencing social withdrawal, structured social skills training can help individuals learn how to engage effectively with others. This may include role-playing, group interactions, and feedback to build confidence in social situations [3].

Gradual Exposure: Encouraging individuals to gradually take on responsibilities can help build competence over time. This might involve setting small, achievable goals that lead to larger challenges, allowing individuals to experience success and reduce anxiety associated with adult tasks [1].

Supportive Relationships: Fostering a supportive network of friends, family, or mentors can provide individuals with the encouragement and guidance necessary to take on adult responsibilities. Positive reinforcement from others can help combat feelings of inadequacy and promote a sense of belonging [6].

Addressing Cultural Influences: It's important to consider the cultural context of individuals. Encouraging personal growth while respecting cultural values can help individuals navigate their paths to competence without feeling alienated from their backgrounds [1].

Mindfulness and Emotional Regulation Techniques: Teaching mindfulness practices can assist individuals in managing emotional instability and enhancing self-awareness. Techniques such as meditation, deep breathing, and journaling can promote emotional health and clarity [4].

Building Self-Esteem: Programs aimed at boosting self-esteem can help individuals recognize their strengths and capabilities. Positive affirmations, achievement recognition, and reframing negative thoughts are essential components of this process [5].

Through these comprehensive treatment strategies, individuals can work towards achieving adult competence by overcoming the barriers that have held them back, ultimately leading to a more fulfilling and independent adult life.

Sources

1 The Psychology of Freedom by Peter R. Breggin, M.D.
2 the Liberal Mind by Lyle H. Rossiter Jr., M.D.
3 Liberalism is a Mental Disorder: Savage Solutions by Michael Savage, 2005 edition
4 Abnormal Psychology: An Integrative Approach 8th Edition by David H. Barlow, Vincent Mark Durand, and Stefan G. Hofmann
5 Man in the Trap by Elsworth F. Baker
6 Criminological and Forensic Psychology Third Edition by Helen Gavin

Prevention:

Preventing the symptoms and signs of failure to achieve adult competence involves proactive measures that focus on emotional, social, and cognitive development from an early age. Here are several key strategies:

Encouraging Independence Early On: From childhood, it’s crucial to foster a sense of independence by allowing children to make age-appropriate decisions. This can help them develop confidence in their abilities and learn to take responsibility for their choices [2].

Promoting Emotional Intelligence: Teaching children and adolescents how to recognize and manage their emotions can prevent emotional instability in adulthood. Programs that focus on emotional regulation, empathy, and communication skills can build a strong foundation for healthy relationships [4].

Providing Life Skills Education: Incorporating life skills training into educational curricula can prepare individuals for the realities of adult life. Topics such as financial literacy, problem-solving, and effective communication should be emphasized to ensure that young people feel competent and prepared [5].

Building Resilience Through Challenges: Encouraging children to face challenges and learn from failures can foster resilience. Providing a supportive environment where mistakes are viewed as opportunities for growth can help prevent avoidance behaviors later in life [1].

Strengthening Social Connections: Facilitating opportunities for social interaction, such as group activities and community programs, can help individuals develop essential social skills. Positive peer relationships can also provide support and reinforce a sense of belonging [3].

Modeling Healthy Adult Behaviors: Parents and caregivers should model responsible adult behaviors, demonstrating effective decision-making, emotional regulation, and conflict resolution. Children often learn by observing, so positive role models can have a significant impact [6].

Encouraging Goal Setting: Teaching individuals to set realistic and achievable goals can instill a sense of purpose and direction. Goal-setting practices can help individuals learn to break tasks into manageable steps, fostering a sense of accomplishment [2].

Addressing Adverse Experiences Early: Identifying and addressing trauma or adverse experiences in childhood can prevent long-term psychological issues. Providing access to counseling or support services can help mitigate the impact of such experiences on adult competence [4].

By implementing these preventative strategies, individuals can be better equipped to navigate the challenges of adulthood, ultimately reducing the likelihood of experiencing symptoms associated with failure to achieve adult competence. These proactive measures promote emotional growth, social skills, and a strong sense of personal responsibility.

Sources

1 the Liberal Mind by Lyle H. Rossiter Jr., M.D.
2 The Psychology of Freedom by Peter R. Breggin, M.D.
3 Abnormal Psychology: An Integrative Approach 8th Edition by David H. Barlow, Vincent Mark Durand, and Stefan G. Hofmann
4 The Personality Disorders Treatment Planner: Includes DSM-5 Updates (PracticePlanners) 2nd Edition by Neil R. Bockian, Julia C. Smith, and Arthur E. Jongsma Jr.
5 Liberalism is a Mental Disorder: Savage Solutions by Michael Savage, 2005 edition
6 Criminological and Forensic Psychology Third Edition by Helen Gavin




Friday, October 18, 2024

Epistemological nihilism

 Epistemological nihilism stems from a fundamental rejection of objective reality and reason as the primary means of human knowledge and understanding. These philosophical movements often deny the existence of an objective reality, leading to a dismissal of absolute truths and principles.

Kantianism, Neo-Kantianism, and German Idealism each approach the pursuit of knowledge and truth from distinct philosophical perspectives, yet they all diverge from the Objectivist emphasis on reason and objective reality.


Kantianism: Immanuel Kant proposed that while we can know the phenomena (the world as we perceive it), the noumena (things-in-themselves) remain inaccessible to human cognition. He introduced the idea that our understanding of the world is shaped by innate categories of the mind, suggesting that objective reality is mediated by subjective perception. This places a limitation on the pursuit of objective knowledge, as it implies that reality is never fully knowable [2].

Neo-Kantianism: This movement emerged as a response to Kant's ideas, attempting to focus on the epistemological aspects of his philosophy. Neo-Kantians emphasized the role of science and logical analysis in understanding phenomena but continued to assert that our knowledge is limited to human experience and cannot transcend it to grasp the noumenal world. Like Kant, Neo-Kantians maintained that our perception of reality is filtered through subjective frameworks, which challenges the pursuit of objective truth [3].

German Idealism: This philosophical school, which includes figures like Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel, sought to build upon and expand Kant's ideas. German Idealists often posited that reality is fundamentally shaped by the mind and that the external world is a construct of consciousness. They argued for the primacy of ideas and the processes of the mind in constituting reality, thereby denying the independent existence of an objective reality apart from human perception and thought [4].

These philosophies contrast sharply with Objectivism, which holds that reality exists independently of our consciousness and can be understood through reason and empirical evidence. Kantianism, Neo-Kantianism, and German Idealism each introduce elements of subjectivity that can lead to forms of epistemological nihilism by undermining the certainty and accessibility of objective knowledge [5].

Sources

1 the Virtue of Selfishness by Ayn Rand

2 Ominous Parallels by Leonard Peikoff

3 Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology by Ayn Rand

4 For the New Intellectual by Ayn Rand

5 Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology by Ayn Rand expanded 2nd edition edited by Harry Binswanger and Leonard Peikoff containing never-before published philosophical material by Ayn rand

6 the Romantic Manifesto by Ayn Rand


Pragmatism: Pragmatism undermines the concept of absolute truth by suggesting that the truth of an idea is determined by its practical consequences rather than its correspondence to reality. It promotes a form of relativism where concepts are validated by their utility, not by their adherence to objective facts [1].

Postmodernism: Postmodernism is characterized by skepticism towards grand narratives and objective truths. It often promotes the idea that reality is constructed through language and cultural interpretations, leading to the belief that there are no universal truths, only subjective interpretations [4].

Existentialism: Existentialism emphasizes individual experience and the subjective nature of reality. It argues that meaning is not inherent in the universe but is created by individuals. This leads to a focus on personal perspectives and emotions over objective reality [2].

Subjectivism: Subjectivism posits that knowledge and truth are dependent on individual perspectives, feelings, and experiences rather than objective reality. It rejects the idea that there are facts independent of individual consciousness [3].

These forms of nihilism arise from a fundamental evasion of reality and a rejection of reason as man's basic means of survival and knowledge. They prioritize subjective experiences and emotions over objective facts, leading to a worldview that is disconnected from the metaphysically given and the principles of rational thought. Such philosophies undermine the pursuit of truth and knowledge by dismissing the role of reason and the existence of an objective, independent reality [5][6].

Sources

1 Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology by Ayn Rand

2 Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology by Ayn Rand expanded 2nd edition edited by Harry Binswanger and Leonard Peikoff containing never-before published philosophical material by Ayn rand

3 For the New Intellectual by Ayn Rand

4 Ominous Parallels by Leonard Peikoff

5 the Anti-industrial Revolution by Ayn Rand

6 the Romantic Manifesto by Ayn Rand


In addition to pragmatism, postmodernism, existentialism, and subjectivism, there are other forms of epistemological nihilism that similarly reject the foundation of objective reality and reason as the means to attain knowledge.


Skepticism: Skepticism involves doubting the possibility of obtaining any certain knowledge. It questions the reliability of human cognition and perception, ultimately leading to the denial of the possibility of objective knowledge. By continuously questioning and doubting, skepticism undermines the confidence in reason and observation, which are essential to understanding reality [4].

Relativism: Relativism posits that truth and moral values are not absolute but are relative to the perspectives or cultures of individuals or groups. This ideology denies the existence of universal principles or truths, suggesting that what is considered true or moral can vary from one context to another. This negation of absolutes leads to a form of epistemological nihilism, where objective standards are dismissed [6].

Deconstructionism: This is a form of criticism that seeks to unravel and expose contradictions in texts and ideas, often leaving them devoid of any fixed meaning. Deconstructionism argues that language and texts are unstable and that meanings are subjective, thus rejecting the possibility of deriving objective truth from language or literature [3].

Anti-realism: Anti-realism challenges the notion that there is a reality independent of human perceptions and concepts. It asserts that our understanding of the world is constructed by our mental frameworks, rather than being a reflection of an objective reality. This viewpoint negates the existence of an independent reality that can be known and understood through reason [1].

These forms of epistemological nihilism share a common thread in their rejection of reason and objective reality as the basis for knowledge. They prioritize subjective interpretation and doubt over the pursuit of truth grounded in reality and logical reasoning, which is antithetical to the principles of Objectivism [5].

Sources

1 Ominous Parallels by Leonard Peikoff

2 Understanding Objectivism by Leonard Peikoff. Edited by Michael S. Berliner

3 Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology by Ayn Rand

4 Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology by Ayn Rand expanded 2nd edition edited by Harry Binswanger and Leonard Peikoff containing never-before published philosophical material by Ayn rand

5 The DIM Hypothesis by Leonard Peikoff

6 Philosophy: Who Needs It by Ayn Rand


In addition to the forms of epistemological nihilism previously mentioned, there are other variations that similarly undermine the pursuit of objective knowledge and truth. These include:

  1. Cynicism: Cynicism involves a general distrust of others' motives and skepticism towards the possibility of genuine knowledge or truth. It often leads to a dismissive attitude toward philosophical or intellectual endeavors, believing them to be inherently flawed or deceptive [1].

  2. Pyrrhonism: This ancient form of skepticism advocates for suspending judgment on all matters, asserting that we cannot know anything for certain. It emphasizes perpetual inquiry and doubt, ultimately leading to the paralysis of thought and action due to the belief that no knowledge can be conclusively attained [2].

  3. Nihilistic Post-structuralism: This perspective combines elements of nihilism and post-structuralism, arguing that structures and systems of meaning are inherently unstable and meaningless. It suggests that any attempt to understand or categorize knowledge is futile because language and meaning are constantly shifting [3].

These forms of epistemological nihilism share a rejection of the possibility of objective knowledge and truth, often promoting doubt, skepticism, and the primacy of subjective interpretation over reason and reality. They stand in contrast to the Objectivist view, which upholds reason as the primary means of understanding the world and recognizing objective reality [4][5].

1 Ominous Parallels by Leonard Peikoff

2 Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology by Ayn Rand

3 Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology by Ayn Rand expanded 2nd edition edited by Harry Binswanger and Leonard Peikoff containing never-before published philosophical material by Ayn rand

4 Understanding Objectivism by Leonard Peikoff. Edited by Michael S. Berliner

5 The DIM Hypothesis by Leonard Peikoff

6 Objectivism: the Philosophy of Ayn Rand by Leonard Peikoff

Thursday, October 17, 2024

Causes of collapsing birthrate all over the world

(evidence + warrants = claim)


Some reasons behind the collapsing birthrate we see all over the world.


Economic Considerations:

Evidence: Research shows that countries with higher costs of living, such as Japan and many Western European nations, have lower birthrates. A study by the OECD indicates that financial stability is a significant factor in family planning decisions.

Warrant: When individuals perceive that they cannot afford the financial burden of raising children, they are likely to delay or avoid parenthood. Economic security is a rational priority that influences reproductive choices.


Changing Social Norms:

Evidence: Surveys indicate that younger generations prioritize personal fulfillment and career success over traditional family roles. For instance, a Pew Research Center study found that many millennials view having a successful career as more important than having children.

Warrant: As societal values shift towards individualism and self-actualization, people are likely to choose paths that align with their personal goals rather than conforming to traditional expectations of family life.


Access to Contraception and Family Planning:

Evidence: The introduction of effective contraceptive methods has been linked to declines in birthrates. According to the Guttmacher Institute, increased access to contraception has led to a significant decrease in unintended pregnancies.

Warrant: When individuals have the ability to control their reproductive choices, they can make informed decisions about when to have children, resulting in lower birthrates as they may choose to delay or limit family size.


Work-Life Balance:

Evidence: Countries with supportive family policies, such as paid parental leave and affordable childcare, tend to have higher birthrates. For example, Sweden's family-friendly policies correlate with a relatively high birthrate compared to countries lacking such support.

Warrant: If individuals perceive that they cannot balance work and family life due to a lack of support, they may opt against having children, prioritizing their careers instead.


Urbanization:

Evidence: Studies show that urban areas often have lower birthrates compared to rural areas. The United Nations reports that urbanization leads to lifestyle changes that favor smaller families.

Warrant: The challenges of urban living, including higher costs and space constraints, can lead individuals to prefer fewer children or to remain child-free, as they adapt to the realities of city life.


Cultural Shifts:

Evidence: Research indicates that cultural attitudes toward parenting have evolved, with many viewing it as a significant commitment. The American Psychological Association notes that the perception of parenting as a demanding and resource-intensive role can deter individuals from having children.

Warrant: When people perceive child-rearing as an overwhelming responsibility, they may rationally choose to delay or avoid it altogether, aligning their choices with their values and lifestyle preferences.

The affordability crisis in New York City and socialism is not the cure

 "The affordability crisis in New York City in 2025".  The signs and symptoms, causes, consequences, treatment/cure, and preventio...