political prosecution, its objective definition. Persecution of Trump by political prosecution
political prosecution, objective definition
To find an objective definition of "political prosecution":
(1) Reducing the concept to its perceptual roots and basic axioms/principles:
Perceptual Roots:
Actions of prosecuting individuals or entities
Designation of certain prosecutions as "political" in nature
Motives, intentions behind prosecutions (which require inductive inferences from evidence)
Basic Axioms/Principles:
A is A (Law of Identity)
Existence exists (Objectivity principle)
Consciousness is consciousness of something (Consciousness principle)
No contradictions (Law of Non-Contradiction)
Rule of law principles - equality under the law, due process, etc.
(2) Additional intermediate steps/principles:
Principles of jurisprudence - defining legitimate vs illegitimate prosecutorial conduct
Ethical principles regarding abuse of prosecutorial powers
Political philosophy on proper role/limits of state power
Evidentiary standards for inferring improper motives
(3) Essential/Distinguishing Characteristics:
Prosecution initiated and pursued on overtly partisan political grounds
Selective/disparate enforcement of laws based on political factors
Using prosecutorial powers as a weapon against political opponents
Lack of impartiality/presence of conflicts of interest
(4) Definition:
A political prosecution is a criminal prosecution initiated and pursued primarily on partisan political grounds or as a means to punish, harass or disadvantage political opponents, rather than as a legitimate, impartial enforcement of laws based on evidence.
Genus: Criminal prosecution
Differentia: Improperly motivated by partisan politics rather than legitimate law enforcement
The criteria for an objective definition are:
Roots in perceptual data/evidence
Derived from fundamental axioms/principles
Logically built up through valid intermediate steps
Essential characteristics capture actual core distinguishing factors
This definition aims to meet those criteria by:
Grounding in observable prosecutorial actions and inferable motives
Deriving from axioms like identity, objectivity, non-contradiction
Layering on valid jurisprudence and ethical principles
Identifying core elements like selectivity, impartiality, conflicts of interest
However, given the difficulties in conclusively proving subjective motives and intent behind prosecutors' decisions, and disagreements over where to draw boundaries of proper vs improper conduct, the universality of this definition has some inherent limitations. More specifically defining those boundaries objectively remains a challenge.
So while striving to be objective and rooted in fundamentals, this represents my best current effort, but doesn't qualify as a perfect, eternally universal definition given the contextual factors involved. It aims to be general by capturing core distinguishing elements.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Comments
Post a Comment